The blogmaster will be brief not because there isn’t a lot that can be written about the subject matter but because it is late.

It was reported last week that a no case submission was upheld in the court case against Wayne Dexter Reid. “Reid had been charged with possession, possession with intent to supply and trafficking 282.7 pounds of cannabis on April 26, 2016.The illegal drugs had a street value of over $500 000“.

As incredulous as it may seem the media report states that the “the police claimed they went at the house of the accused armed with a warrant to search, claimed they found the door ajar, entered the home and claimed they found drugs inside“.

There was the other matter of a court application by Commissioner of Police rejected.  The request attempted to have First Caribbean International Bank  (FCIB) release records to the US Department of Justice in the ICBL Donville Inniss matter ongoing in the US courts . Judge Olson Alleyne tossed out the filing because the correct procedure was not followed.

The two matters highlighted require little editorial comment except to ask- will anybody be held accountable?

Related links:

 

 

52 responses to “Cock-up by Commissioner of Police”


  1. IS THIS ANOTHER ONE SETUP BY THE BARBADOS BAYGON SPRAY POLICE FORCE?

    Procedural gaps in the trial and the absence of physical evidence in the face of statements an accused man apparently made but never signed led an appeals court to vacate the conviction of Omar Dacosta Holder for the 2005 triple murder of a young mother and her infant children.

    The Court of Appeal ruled “reluctantly” that the capital murder case against him should have never gone to trial and declared the conviction unsafe.

    This morning’s decision comes almost a month after Holder’s attorney Andrew Pilgrim, QC, delivered a tongue-lashing on the court for its tardiness in handing down a judgment in an appeal made on Holder’s behalf back in 2013.

    The former murder convict of Pasture Road, Haggatt Hall, St Michael had been on death row for the past decade after he was sentenced to death when a jury found him guilty of the murders of 20-year-old Sakina Walrond, her son Shaqkem Gittens, aged 3, and two-month-old daughter Sha-Mya Mapp on March 31, 2005.

    In handing down the ruling Chief Justice Sir Marston Gibson explained that the Crown’s case against Holder was “predicated largely” on several oral statements as well as a written statement which he allegedly dictated but refused to sign.

    The “appellant never initialled the statements to the police nor did he sign the so-called written statements, which he disavowed and attempted to destroy by chewing.

    “Next, it is clear to us that both statements were oral since neither statements was ever acknowledged by the appellant’s signature or initial”, Sir Marston said.

    During the trial, the court heard that Holder had allegedly told police when questioned that “my Creator tell me to make a sacrifice” before hitting the young mother on the head as she slept with one of her children moments before setting their Haggatt Hall home on fire.

    But according to the Chief Justice, no ‘voir dire’ – a preliminary examination of a witness or a juror by a judge or attorney – was conducted at trial since the appellant never disputed the reliability of the statements and never alleged that he was in any way forced or induced to make the statements.

    Sir Marston said: “In the absence of any eyewitness, fingerprint or other trace evidence or DNA or other forensic evidence or any other evidence to corroborate the appellant’s oral statements, we hold and do so with the greatest reluctance that this case ought not to have gone to the jury at all, however credible the oral statements may have appeared to have been.

    “Accordingly, there is merit in the appellant’s contention that the verdict is unsafe and unsatisfactory in so far as the case ought not to have gone to the jury. There was accordingly a lurking doubt about the verdict, the appeal must, therefore, be allowed. The appeal is allowed, the conviction is quashed and the sentence be set aside. Mr Holder, that’s the judgment from the court.”

    Several minutes later, Holder walked out of the Supreme Court Complex into the arms of his older sister, accompanied by attorney-at-law Kyle Walkes who was substituting for Pilgrim in the case.

    After speaking with his lawyer and a nephew who was also outside the court and phoning family members to break the news, Holder told Barbados TODAY that he was happy to be freed.

    But Holder, who claimed he was “set up”, also declared himself a changed man after years in “horrible, horrible” prison.

    He said: “It’s good to be free, the Lord sees and knows…. Obviously, I get set up so I know that victory was always on the way and I was on death row for ten years and three months and jail horrible.

    “Getting water and bread ‘pun an evening and something name ‘manna rice’ that ain’t even in society.

    “’Manna rice’ you goin’ get it every day; if you refuse it, nothing else ain’t coming. Jail horrible, horrible place to be. I am so glad that the Father [get me out].”

    He continued: “All I want society to know is that they tarnish my reputation, my character and everything but the Father sees and knows and deliver me from the hardship that I was going through and I got ‘nuff to thank the Lord for.

    “The 14 years that I went in, I am not the same person. I am a changed man – people will see it gradually as I walk the walk and talk the talk.

    I just want to thank Pilgrim for the hard work he and his associates [put in], for the good job they put up and do. I just want to be with my family now and it is nice to be free.”

    His older sister, who declined to give her name, said she was elated with the news.

    She said: “Put God in front and everything will work out.

    “I never doubted but I was not looking for it so soon.

    “I am so, so excited, overjoyed. I am glad that he is home.

    “I just hope that he will… move on and put God first in anything that he do.”

    Holder had some advice for the youth especially in the face of the violence plaguing society.

    “I want the youths to know that jail ain’t no bed of roses and they better check themselves.

    “Crime don’t pay. I was there long. I was there 14 years, three months and days so I can tell you it hard and rough.

    “See crime and lef’ it alone. I glad that my family was there for me from the start they didn’t lef’ me.

    “Think before you do things, boy; jail rough.

    “It’s a horrible place to be so I won’t even want my enemy go there,” he said.

    https://barbadostoday.bb/2019/08/01/jail-rough/

    Moral of the story never trust local Police who many are criminals themselves.


  2. $35m ICBL deal in works
    by SHAWN CUMBERBATCH
    shawncumberbatch@nationnews.com
    THE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF BARBADOS LTD (ICBL) could be on the verge of changing hands in a deal worth about $35.8 million.
    Bermuda group BF& M Limited has revealed it is planning to sell its majority 51.2 per cent (20.1 million shares) share of the former Government-owned insurer it has controlled since January 2006.
    BF& M signed a “non-binding” sale agreement last November and an unnamed interested buyer has been assessing ICBL as it decides if to conclude the transaction.
    Group chairman and chief executive officer John Wight announced the pending divestment as BF& M recently reported on its 2019 performance, but he declined to comment further when reached yesterday by the DAILY NATION.
    Wight, who is also ICBL’s chairman, informed shareholders the move to walk away from the former statutory corporation, whose divestment by the Owen Arthur administration generated major controversy, was “a strategic decision by the company to focus on its core territories”.
    “While this company provided stable and acceptable returns to BF& M over many years, the Barbados economy has been very challenged in recent years, highlighted by the International Monetary Fund’s intervention and financial support of Barbados in 2018,” he said.
    ICBL’s Bermuda parent now considers it a “discontinued operation” as outlined in BF& M’s 2019 annual report, which detailed that the decision to “dispose of its Barbados operation” was made in October last year.
    “An initial non-binding term sheet of the sale was signed in November 2019. Subsequent to year-end, due diligence is ongoing. The transaction is subject to regulatory approval and other closing conditions,” the company said.
    BF& M bought more than half of ICBL from Government(through St Lucia-based subsidiary Hamilton Financial

    Ltd), reportedly for about $51.7 million, 14 years ago.
    When its financial year ended on last December 31, the Barbados entity had a book value of $49 million, but the Bermudans said the shares being sold were “written down by $13.2 million to fair value as at December 31, 2019”. Hence the expected $35.8 million selling price.
    Based on a 2018 shareholder analysis, ICBL’s remaining 48.8 per cent shareholding is owned by more than 2 238 institutional investors and individual shareholders in the Caribbean, North America and Europe.
    Single largest shareholder
    However, the biggest number of those who own its stock – 2 142 – were listed as resident here. Outside of BF& M, Barbados’ National Insurance Board is the single largest ICBL shareholder with 3.9 million shares (9.91 per cent).
    ICBL is a public listed company and its shares trade on the Barbados Stock Exchange. Any share sale of the magnitude BF& M is pursuing requires the approval of Barbados’ regulators, including the Financial Services Commission (FSC).
    Chairman Avinash Persaud said “if and when” the deal was assessed by the FSC, the focus “will be to make sure the transaction does not undermine the FSC’s two principal concerns: consumer protection and systemic resilience”.
    He also noted that the Fair Trading Commission “may consider if there are any relevant competition issues, which would be of critical concern if the transaction reduced the number of independent providers of insurance to a point that limited competition and consumer choice”.
    BF& M is seeking to exit ICBL following a challenging period for the company, including the payment of US$36 000 to former Government minister Donville Inniss, for which he was charged and found guilty of money laundering charges in the United States.
    The insurer also suffered $30.1 million impairment when its $90 million in Government securities were restructured in 2018. This contributed to an overall $8.8 million loss for the company that financial year, but in 2019 it earned a $4.2 million profit.
    Source: Nation Newspaper

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading