I had every intention of staying away from politics during the current election campaign. However, after hearing the concerns of a few friends of mine, who happen to be Democratic Labour Party supporters, about the employment prospects of some government ministers, in the event of a change in government, I have decided to put their minds at ease.

Their concerns were that: it isn’t fair to remove the present crop of ministers because they were dealt a bad hand from inception; and many of them did not have professions to enable them to fit comfortably back into private life, after piloting this country through such rough times. My friends were of the view that the Opposition candidates were mostly professionals and did not need the jobs. All I tried, I could not convince them that their fears were misplaced. I would now like to share my views with the wider audience afforded me by the Nation.

Most importantly, all elected members of parliament know that they were literally employed, by the electorate, on a five year contract, renewable at the voters’ pleasure. Ordinarily that means the voters would renew parliamentarians’ contracts after satisfactory performance.

It is noteworthy that this same administration has put in place the Employment Rights Act which allows an employer to fairly terminate a worker, without a cent in compensation, for poor performance. As practised locally, it does not matter that employee could have had a number of years of good service prior to the subject poor performance.

In the case of politicians in Barbados, they have no reason to fear dismissal without compensation, whether their performance is good, bad or ridiculous. Believe it or not, after this less than stellar performance, the Prime Minister, in the event that he ceases to hold that office even if he becomes part of the Opposition, is entitled as of right to a pension for life. At current rates of salary, he is entitled to a full pension of $11,287.53 per month. And if he chooses, he can opt to receive a gratuity of $423,282.50 and a reduced pension of $8,456.65 per month.

After eight years service, the other ministers and parliamentary secretaries qualify for retiring benefits from fifty years of age, as shown in the table below:

Pension Gratuity

Minister. $4,761.94. $238,096.88

(After 8 years service)

Minister. $6,349.25 $317,464.50

(After 12 years’ service)

Parliamentary Secretary $4,622.70. $231,134.81

(After 8 years’ service)

Parliamentary Secretary $6,163.58 $308,179.17

(After 12 years’ service)

Also, in addition to the above, politicians are entitled to another pension when they attain an age to qualify for the National Insurance pension, which can be as early as sixty years of age. It is clear that these individuals are set for life, and there is no reason to fear that they would go hungry.

The people of this country should worry less about the quality of life of politicians after retirement and spare a thought for police officers, firemen and Transport Board drivers among other persons who give full time public service. But I want to make a case for the three categories of persons that I have mentioned who are required to do hard physical labour and should also be allowed to retire early on full pension as well.

Members of parliament qualify to receive their pensions at fifty years of age. On the other hand, these same politicians over time have gone to parliament and increased the retirement age for other public servants to sixty-seven. Now just imagine, a 66 year-old policeman pursuing and trying to apprehend a fleet-of-foot 20 something year-old suspect. Also, what about the 66 year-old fireman with arthritic knees running up a ladder attempting to save someone from certain death.

We must ask ourselves if it fair and what is so special about desk-bound politicians that they can receive their pensions and gratuities at 50 and police officers and firemen have to wait for a further seventeen years?

However it seems that everyone has forgotten about Transport Board drivers. They are also required to work until 67 years of age. Unfortunately for them, they are the only public workers that are not entitled to a pension or gratuity from their employer. When they reach retirement age, they receive their last weekly pay cheque and go home.

This country must stop deifying politicians and do the right thing by all workers.

77 responses to “The Caswell Franklyn Column – Politicians Feathered their Nests for Life while Ignoring other Workers”

  1. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    John

    You asked:

    “How many of the current lot (30) in Parliament are pensionable?

    How big is our exposure?”

    So far only Bostic, in the lower house, is not pensionable. But who said anything about 30? In addition to those 29, we have a number of persons from the Senate: Maxine McClean, Darcy Boyce, Patrick Todd, Irene Sandiford-Garner, Harry Husbands and Kerry-Ann Ifill.

    Sent from my iPad


  2. Caswell

    We born with luck!!!


  3. Caswell Franklyn May 21, 2018 3:30 PM

    Is there an annual report on the parliamentary pension scheme? The number of pensioners and active members? Do we know the actuarial cost of the scheme? Is it a contributory pension?


  4. Is it a contributory pension?

    +++++++++++++++++++++

    Taxes are contributory!!


  5. BT

    It isn’t possible to change the mindset at the top …. how can you …. their minds are set on theft and feathering their nests.

    It is the bottom and the middle where the mindset needs to be changed … and it can be …. easily … because it is them from whom the top is stealing,

  6. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Hal

    They pay 5% of their salary which is unrealistic, especially since public officers pension is valued at 20% of salary.

    Sent from my iPad


  7. Caswell Franklyn May 21, 2018 5:39 PM

    A contribution of less than 20 per cent of income will not be enough to provide a reasonable living in retirement. There are any number of pensions we can use to share our local pension provisions: The Chilean state pension, the New Zealand Kiwisaver, the Australian Superannuation fund, the UK’s stakeholder, etc.
    We need a national discussion about the three tiers of pensions – private (ie Clico annuities), occupational and state. We also need to discuss the awful management of the NIS. Pity none of the leading parties vying to be government has not raised the issue, apart from a promise to raise state basic pensions.


  8. Just a foolish question … do MP’s pay income tax?


  9. Income tax is deducted at source from Parliamentary salaries.

    But a better question might be, when they were in self employed jobs were they paying income tax and national insurance?

    I don’t know since each person’s tax information is private, but it would be good if Parliamentarians were required to declare their assets, their liabilities, and be open about their tax information.

    Right now we know little about our elected representatives.

    We don’t know for example if they owe an enemy of Barbados millions of dollars. We don’t know if they owe the devil.


  10. @May 21, 2018 4:10 AM “It’s worse than you think, parliamentarians qualify for a full pension after 12 years.”

    So if the 23 year old who has offered himself for election is elected, this means that he can his full 2/3 of salary pension at 35 and for the rest of his life?

    Whereas worker X, who is also 23 and who goes to work for the first time on May 24th this year would have to work until age 67, that is for 44 years before being eligible for a full pension.

    Do I have it right?

    Does this also mean that workers who are in their late 60’s may have to pay full pensions to retired 35 year old Parliamentarians?

  11. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    Simple Simon

    They would have to wait until they reach 50 years of age to receive the pension, unless they become prime minister, who qualifies at any age after holding that post for as little as any part of a day.

    Sent from my iPad


  12. Thanks Caswell


  13. Some people are allowed to retire early, ie professional sportsmen and women, such as boxers, who can officially retire at age 40.


  14. Comparing our over weight politicians to professional sports men and women adds a new dimension to the discussion!!

    It can’t be said that politicians the world over are not professional athletes, Arnold Schwarzenegger former Governor of California is an example.

    Which one of ours most closely resembles the Arnold look?

    Froon perhaps … Mia?

    … but in all seriousness, most sports people are forced to retire even earlier than 40 through injury.

    Not many of our cricketers for example even make it to 40.

    That’s why many sportsmen and women get enormous pay days …. and of course those paydays are based on performance … usually.

    Maybe it is just a West Indies thing because like our politicians the performance and pay of our cricketers when they represent us are not even closely linked.

    Mediocrity is a bitch.


  15. ……. but, once upon a time we were not mediocre!!

    So, what is done when a sports team has in mediocre players or they are past their sell by date?

    Change, and move on.


  16. @ Simple Simon
    We don’t know for example if they owe an enemy of Barbados millions of dollars. We don’t know if they owe the devil.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    What enemy of Barbados what??!!
    Our biggest ‘enemy’ is ourselves.

    ….but Bushie has long been explaining about our debt to the Devil.

    After years of borrowing on Satan’s account of albino-centric materialism, selfishness, greed and brass bowlery, we were finally downgraded (the FIRST ONE THAT OCCURRED) to shiite status on the BBE scale of values.

    The Devil has been running things ever since then.

    Like Massy and Emera, they allowed us to keep the old names for a while -to fool ourselves that we were still the old ‘Barbados’ of which John speaks…, but just like MASSA signs now dominate the landscape and the Satanic Monument dominates the South Coast, Government Headquarters, and City….. so too will the other symbols of evil come to dominate our total landscape.

    crime
    accidents
    natural disasters
    shiite…
    hopelessness

    In sum….
    We no longer ‘owe’ the Devil
    WE have become totally acquired subsidiaries of his global operations
    Welcome to Hell.
    Our last chance to evade default rested with Caswell …and a BUP operation.

    While brass bowls seek solace in;
    -elections
    -economics,
    -leadership,
    -wealthy friends,
    -hard work,
    -and in the IMF……

    It is righteousness that exalts a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.


  17. John May 22, 2018 4:12 AM

    Sportspeople can retire whenever they like, but to officially claim on their approved pensions, they must reach a minimum age, usually about 40. There are tax implications when retiring.


  18. Arnold retired at 27!!!

    … at least from bodybuilding!!

    Michael Holding retired at 34 or 35!!

    Both continued working, but in different areas.

    If either had a pension plan based on their profession as sportsmen it could not have required them to retire after 40!!

    Many people naturally keep working till they can’t.

    For them it is so much more enjoyable than retirement.


  19. There are very few sports that you will find sportsmen over 40 earning their living competitively!!

    Tiger Woods is still sputtering in golf.

    Lester Piggott went on till he was pretty old as a jockey.

    So there are some, but many will retire a sportsman/woman.

    Formula 1 car racing usually retires them in a blaze of glory … no tax implications for the dead!!


  20. John May 22, 2018 8:58 PM

    If either had a pension plan based on their profession as sportsmen it could not have required them to retire after 40!!(Quote)

    The problem with Barbadians is that they are experts on everything. I am simply stating tax and pensions law in the UK, which allows some sportspeople to retire by the age of 40 from their primary jobs. State approved pensions carry certain tax advantages.
    Of course they can continue working at another job, the same way that someone reaching state retirement age can continue working until their 90s.
    Riding a horse is not he same as standing in a boxing ring with a 21 yr old punching toe to toe. Of course, a retired boxer can become a boxing analyst.


  21. The problem with Barbadians is that they are experts on everything. I am simply stating tax and pensions law in the UK, which allows some sportspeople to retire by the age of 40 from their primary jobs.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++

    The problem with Barbadians in the UK is they don’t say what they mean!!

    Just pulling your leg!!


  22. What about retirement age for categories such as nurses. Imagine a 66 year old nurse with degenative condition like athritis of hips/knees trying move around a ward setting in haste to resuccitate a patient or perform some urgent care to save a life! Or with cataract or glaucoma trying to work out IV flow or reading med charts especially at night when staff compliment is even lower than during the day. Would he/she be accountable for any error(s) made in medication. The answer is a resounding YES ! Would you like to be the patient on the recieving end ? Some how i believe this legislation was nog tboroughly thought out. Furthermore the CTUSAB submitted a request for review of this . It has not yet been done.” All animals are equal “but obviously as seen here “some are more equal than others”. In addition public service workers must complete full 33.3 yrs to get full pension but the politicisn has only to complete 2 terms to vet full pension.


  23. May 26, 2018 12:41 PM

    The state retirement age is fine. But people can always take out private pensions or save more .


  24. What has the retirement age got to do with ill health?

    Imagine a 42 year old nurse with degenative condition like athritis of hips/knees trying move around a ward setting in haste to resuccitate a patient or perform some urgent care to save a life!

    …also.. there are 70 year nurses who are in the peak of health.
    Should they still be ‘moving around a ward setting….’…?

    Retirement should be a period in one’s life where one can get to enjoy the fruits of one’s labour; to remove oneself from the shiite stresses of life; to enjoy grand children etc; and to face death with disdain.

    Sixty sounds about right…
    – twenty years of education and preparation
    – forty years of hard work and savings
    – ten years of bliss
    – everything else is gravy
    LOL
    ha ha ha


  25. Pension reform of Jan 2003 was responsible for the increase in pensionable age from 65-67. Increasing by 1/2 year every 4 years from January 01, 2006 and the last being Jan 01 2018. This was introduced while Richard Nunez was Actuary at NIS.


  26. Hal Austin, the state retirement age can’t be fine when you have persons working on minimum wage who can’t afford to eat twice a day furthermore invest in retirement plans. Since that has been introduced we have persons whose emplyer’s policy has retirement age as 65 and their services are terminated at 65 yet they don’t qualify for early pension and have to suffer for 2 years. For those who are slightly more fortunate and qualifies for early pension has to lose 42% of their pension if they opt to retire at 60 and 30% if they opt at 65.

  27. Fractured BLP Avatar

    Caswell is correct !!

    The BLP government members have feathered their nests !!

    How so ?

    • A 30 member Cabinet now in place – $ 8 million cost now !

    • 4 % salary agreement for public service workers – $ 55 million cost now needed !!

    Therefore , in some countries there is :

    • Sharia Law !!

    • In Barbados we have Mia’s Law !!!

    I weep for Barbados 🇧🇧

Leave a Reply to JohnCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading