As we edge apparently aimlessly towards an inevitable general election there appears, at least through my eyes, little or no compulsion to place my X on the ballot paper of any wannabe politician in my constituency. We have only seen our current representative twice in over ten years, a onetime visit to our property and the second at a popular Bridgetown café.

We still await a VAT refund amounting to tens of thousands of dollars due since February 2013 despite having a single year’s Municipal Solid Waste Tax demand with added interest and penalties, even though we have absolutely no state garbage collection. Of course we would be happy to offset this (excluding interest) against any outstanding government dues including land taxes, although not yet payable, but just try and get a response from the Barbados Revenue Authority or its principals.

They seem to think they have absolutely no accountability or obligation to reply to the people paying their salaries.

And in the tourism sector there are still so many unresolved issues including the hundreds and more likely thousands of unregistered and unlicensed accommodation operators trading outside of the required criteria that the others are forced to comply with.

Will any new administration push this pressing matter onto the back burner and ignore the previous work done if elected, or will the long overdue process be forced to start over again with another potential delay of ten years or more? Are ‘we’ really waiting for some yet unknown public relations nightmare to happen that could potentially indelibly help destroy our hard earned reputation as a destination?

What, if any, progress on the promised reduction of VAT and tax concessions on inputs to our standalone restaurants, when the chosen few have been given these trading advantages several years ago and in some individual cases unparallel 40 year, total or partial exemptions.

Our car rental sub-sector has also been forced to absorb massive increases in unbudgeted expenditure, including randomly imposed higher vehicle taxes and duties, the dreaded National Social Responsibility Levy and its 400 per cent increase, higher insurance premiums and let us not for a second, forget the additional damage and maintenance costs caused by the appalling state of our neglected road network.

What is indisputable is that the tourism industry provides the highest number of eligible voters together with their dependents of any sector.

Why do these aspiring politicians not seem to either understand, or wish to address these issues, at least in the hope of securing their votes?

While my little vote is a mere straw in the wind, just maybe there are enough other disillusioned persons out there to demand that at least one politician or party who can fully embrace the dynamics of tourism and its critical role in any possible recovery of our dire economy, hopefully over the next two or three generations.

What part of the phrase ‘tourism is an export’ do they not comprehend and which other major sector offers us any realistic hope of fiscal recuperation?

78 responses to “The Adrian Loveridge Column – Tourism is Our Only Hope”


  1. The Crane is called “The Crane” because it was a major shipping point for goods …. I would guess sugar … to Bridge town and the ships in Carlisle Bay.

    There were no container trucks in those days.

    I have heard there was actually a Crane that lowered and raised cargo from the cliff to the sea.

    Did you know that the Crane Beach was once known as “Skull Bay”?

    Check Professor Marshall’s book.


  2. Professor. Marshall book…
    Title and publisher of possible please…Amazon !

    Hindsight teaches fools
    Fools forget
    Friends forgive

    Friend of bajans
    Guyanese


  3. Of Halls Hills and Holes
    Place Names of Barbados

    Woodville Marshall

    ISBN 978-976-95396-4-8


  4. For those who never knew about Lighters and that ships anchored in Carlisle Bay!!

  5. Bernard Codrington Avatar
    Bernard Codrington

    John
    Production requires capital ,Land and Labour. How the benefits of production is distributed is a political decision. The sugar industry then was the major economic activity. A very large technological input came from the public sector at the botanical level, the factory level, at the marketing and transport level. Much the same as today.

    My major intention was to correct your assertion that the Sugar Industry built the QEH and The Deep Water Harbour.
    GOB had to fight the Sugar Barons to set up the Stabilization Fund for future development of the sector and Barbados as a whole. It took a visionary Political Class to effect these changes. Those were at the level of the Colonial Office, the Governor,and the local Parliament. The major financial adviser to the GOB was Sir Archibald Cuke ,a Barbadian, apart from the colonial Financial Secretary..


  6. Wasn’t the GOB essentially comprised of the “Sugar Barons”?

    My Grandfather used to canvas for one!!


  7. He received a CBE (Commander of the British Empire) in 1953 for Public Service to Barbados and in the 1940’s was speaker of the house.


  8. In 1981 when the Euro devalued and sugar received about half of the revenue it had received the year before, Misappropriation of the funds in the Price Stabilisation fund by the GOB raised its head.

    It was estimated back then that the GOB owed the Sugar Industry upwards of $100 million.

    You can figure out what that is worth today and subtract any “subsidies” from it..

    The 1982 BNB Act enabled the BNB to “subsidise” the Sugar Industry.

    The problem in Barbados has always been not much cash available!!!!

    So the GOB will always be attracted to wherever it can get some.

    The NIS springs to mind … and of course the various laundries in legal offices and accounting firms!!


  9. I was “surfing the net” and found the following advertisement and preamble (below) very interesting:

    “Can’t get enough of those beautiful Caribbean beaches but don’t want to drive your rental car there to enjoy it? Take a look at some of our favorite beachfront villa rentals below! Whether you want to swim, sunbathe, walk, jog or snorkel, just walk out the door of your PRIVATE BEACHFRONT VILLA.”

    “Don’t SACRIFICE PRIVACY and SOLITUDE by SETTLING on a beachfront hotel. By renting a PRIVATE BEACHFRONT VILLA YOU CAN HAVE YOUR BEACH AND ENJOY IT TOO!”

    https://www.wheretostay.com/barbados-villas-for-Beachfront

    When I ask questions in this forum, I am accused by the usual suspects as not having the ability to “think critically” or by not discussing Trump with my children makes me an incompetent parent.

    However, there has been continued “back and forth” about the Crane issue and if beaches are owned by hotels or the public…….or if they are owned by hotels, the public must have access.

    If you read the ad, it seems to be suggesting to potential visitors that there are private beaches in Barbados.

    Or are beachfront properties treated differently from hotels?


  10. Demand greater than Supply …. increase in price …. increase in profits.

    Supply greater than Demand … decrease in price … decrease in profits

    Hence Price Stabilisation Fund.

    Nothing new, price of sugar rose X3 after the supply from Haiti was cut off over 150 years before this film.


  11. If you read the ad, it seems to be suggesting to potential visitors that there are private beaches in Barbados.

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    All beaches are not created equal.

    Foul Bay and Long Beach are “private” because not many people go there.

    Some small Beaches are private because there is no Public Access.

    Private can mean … secluded …… not necessarily segregated!!


  12. Last time I walked down to Cluff’s Bay, Archers Bay and Maycock’s Bay there was not a soul present.

    Maycock’s Bay, unless it has been spoilt by construction is probably one of the nicest place to see and experience in Barbados.

    The old Fort there was once bought by a film star in the 50’s and construction of a Beach House commenced.

    Think it was Claudette Colbert.

    Queens Fort, further down the West Coast is probably hard to get to from the sea side and you probably would need to get there through the property.

    Look at google earth and you will see there are many secluded beaches in Barbados … waiting to be spoilt!!


  13. Man…..wunnuh bright boys duz really like confuse every issue.

    Now you have introduced something completely different, which suggests a beach may be described as being “private” “because not many people go there” or “because there is no Public Access.”

    I believe you spend too much time “over thinking” to make simple issues complicated.


  14. We need a new tourism model that first asks the big questions…Is tourism a benefit to the government of Barbados? if not why not? If so how so? Do we have a ROI policy in government for tourism?

  15. NorthernObserver Avatar
    NorthernObserver

    @Artax
    Barbadians have the issue with ‘beach’, not your average visitor who are here for a short period. John is correct, that in marketing verbiage, private can mean secluded and peaceful. And advertisers will use whatever they can to convey their message. And then some.
    Last Xmas, friends (first time visitors) rented a ‘private beach house’ (their words). When they sent info, I had to explain the said property was waterfront, but any beach was a few hundred feet left or right of the property. It had a few big rocks in front into which the ocean crashed. It was THEIR assumption it was a ‘beach house’, the verbiage never said so, it said “on the sparkling waters of the Caribbean”, and showed pictures of beaches which were nearby.
    The slam in your piece is really against hotels. You may have inferred whatever you want, but it never stated the beach was private. A marketing twist, to convey whatever the reader chooses.
    And those in the property business have several wonderful descriptors…cute/cozy=small, awaiting your touch=unfinished, lovingly enjoyed by the same family for 50 years or first time offered this century=in need of updating, endless possibilities=needs work etc etc


  16. A private beach is like a private room at the hospital. The hospital/hotel owned will charge you a whole lot of money and give you a make believe story that they will keep the hoipolloi out. In fact the hoipolloi will be in and out all day looking after you.

    Who do you think it is that delivers the services you are paying so much money for? Do you ever see the share holders of the hotel or hospital? No. You see the people who cook your food, mop your floors, wash your linens, and in a hospital wipe your shitty behind–ordinary people. In and out all day.

    But we–the tourists too–or especially the tourists are such poor great poppets that we are willing to give already rich people more, and more of our money so that we can buy into an illusion.


  17. @Artax April 11, 2018 10:48 AM “If you read the ad, it seems to be suggesting to potential visitors that there are private beaches in Barbados.”

    It seems to be suggesting that marketing executives too love hyperbole.


  18. I believe you spend too much time “over thinking” to make simple issues complicated.

    +++++++++++++++++

    Not really .. I just think critically … cuts the thinking time to a minimum and …. reduces errors!!


  19. When I ask questions in this forum, I am accused by the usual suspects as not having the ability to “think critically”

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    It isn’t a matter of ability, its just not taking everything you are told at face value.

    I became aware there was actually a technique with the name “critical thinking” in a value engineering course I took back in 1979.

    It is about stripping away the superfluous and picking out the essentials.

    Now I am pretty good at it.

    It is a natural kind of something, hard to describe but you can learn it and improve as you get on in life.

    If it is too good to be true it usually isn’t.


  20. “It seems to be suggesting that marketing executives too love hyperbole.”

    Simple Simon

    You may be correct…….….

    But, my experience in the hotel sector taught me when potential visitors read these ads and pay US$3,000/n for a villa, they expect to find private beaches, where they can relax, undisturbed by locals.

    Although you may argue the ad never mentioned the beach is private (neither did I), the statement re: “Don’t SACRIFICE PRIVACY and SOLITUDE by SETTLING on a beachfront hotel. By renting a PRIVATE beachfront villa you can have YOUR beach and enjoy it too!”……….

    …………seemingly implies they should expect some level of privacy.

    Some ads, for example, may state Barbados is warm and sunny….but a tourist may visit here and experience 2 days of rain fall. Would you believe that tourist would angrily ask staff when the rain will end? And that is enough for him/her not to visit Barbados again.

    And while you’re on about private beaches………. what about Port St. Charles?

    Do any of you know that there are certain areas of the beach at Port St. Charles where locals cannot venture?


  21. “It isn’t a matter of ability, its just not taking everything you are told at face value.”

    Hmmmmmm…..

    Ohhhhh………I understand now…………is it similar to how to never take anything you mention in this forum at face value, because, more often than not, you are incorrect?

    Thanks for the lesson.


  22. Do any of you know that there are certain areas of the beach at Port St. Charles where locals cannot venture?

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    You are admitting that the beach at Port St. Charles is accessible by the public … period.

    You are also adding a second fact (it sounds like) some areas are inaccessible to the public!!!

    So what’s the problem if locals can go to the beach at Port St. Charles?

    There are other coves and bays that Bajans cannot access through a Public Beach Access.

    All beaches are not created equal …. that’s just how it is!!

    You should not let that make you feel insecure, life is to sweet and too short to let yourself bother about trivia!!

    So, don’t sweat the small stuff.


  23. “So what’s the problem if locals can go to the beach at Port St. Charles?”

    “You should not let that make you feel insecure, life is to sweet and too short to let yourself bother about trivia!!”

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Huh???????

    Am……..I’ll allow those two comments to pass outside the off stump.


  24. The article is OK, but the title is ridiculous… it sounds exactly like saying “sugar is our only hope” in 1966.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    The difference between the Barbados economy in 1966 and today is that it was growing!!!
    There was optimism, hope and expectation which seems today to have vanished.

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Here are the numbers …. you can check them.

    Prior to WWII world sugar output was about 30 million tons.

    WWII destroyed the cane production capability of the Philipines and Java the beet production of Europe and the USSR.

    England had sugar from the Caribbean, Africa, Australia and India, the US from itself, Cuba, Puerto Rico and Hawaii.

    In 1945, world output had fallen to 15 million tons.

    The economies in Barbados and all other sugar producing countries grew as the world sought to replace output.

    Today, world output is more than 10 times what it was in 1945, and 5 times what it was when the war begun.

    Sugar output peaked in Barbados in 200,000 tons in 1957, limited by its tiny size.

    Until about 1968 Barbados was profiting from sugar.

    The Deep Water Harbour was built out of Sugar and for sugar.

    It would be difficult to think of a Civil works project in Barbados remotely similar in scope and impact on the economy.

    Then we got a genius for a leader who could not wait to see the last cane blade!!

    https://www.google.com/search?q=world+sugar+production&tbm=isch&tbs=rimg:CY6Du1GsnDX_1IjhaeknfgTfGZOWdVT3fYpENk2w6LHGg2NJMUQKavGoGRxvVlxE8v2dCRwFthLiJKc-5k7tMX1sbxCoSCVp6Sd-BN8ZkEf3hkjQr3xPxKhIJ5Z1VPd9ikQ0RooXhsTXT5k8qEgmTbDoscaDY0hFPXJxwcwXtFCoSCUxRApq8agZHEa2h1B1WeTxZKhIJG9WXETy_1Z0IRvqGY6kaGNz4qEglHAW2EuIkpzxFm6A2D2X2XGCoSCbmTu0xfWxvEEWJjzALkF4W-&tbo=u&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiR4dze3LTaAhXvYd8KHaJJB-EQ9C96BAgAEBg&biw=1366&bih=651&dpr=1#imgrc=joO7UaycNf-tsM:


  25. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-sugarcane-producing-countries.html

    Barbados don’t even get a mention!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Pin prick … and yet there is a lot of idle arable land in bush with which we should do something!!

    Every square inch is a World Heritage Site because of our Quaker past and the impact on the abolition of slavery!!!!

    Clean it, farm it, promote its history, create employment and the Tourist Industry will benefit.

    There is nowhere in the world with such a history!!


  26. … even BT and his weed wacker could get something to do when the day come!!

Leave a Reply to NorthernObserverCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading