Dear Sirs / Madams,

The Clement Payne Movement sent out a Press Release yesterday pertaining to the Fair Trading Commission’s decision on the proposed sale of the BNTCL to the SOL group of companies and other related matters. Unfortunately we were operating on the basis of erroneous information published in the Nation Newspaper about the said FTC decision. Now that the content of the FTC decision has been made clear, we have amended and revised our Press Release as follows :-

 

The Clement Payne Movement denounces the decision of the current Democratic Labour Party (DLP) administration to privatize our state-owned Barbados National Terminal Co. Ltd. (BNTCL) by selling it to Mr Kyffin Simpson’s SOL group of companies, and we applaud the recent decision of the Fair Trading Commission NOT to approve the said sale.

Indeed, we consider the actions of the Freundel Stuart administration to be particularly disgraceful, in light of the fact that they contested (and won) the 2013 General Elections on an anti-privatization platform .

Not only did they solemnly promise the Barbadian people that a re-elected DLP Government would preserve our state-owned enterprises, but they also assured us that they were saving us from dastardly BLP privatization intentions!

Needless-to-say, they shamefully betrayed this solemn undertaking by entering into a contract with Mr Simpson’s conglomerate to sell it not just “a” state-owned enterprise, but to sell it the single most valuable and profitable enterprise owned by us, the people of Barbados .

But, not only is the Stuart administration guilty of deceit and treachery, it is also guilty of being captive to a very backward and reactionary right-wing concept of governance.

You see, Mr Stuart’s administration– like virtually all other elements of the current Barbadian political class — seems to believe that a government must be run solely and totally on the basis of taxation. In other words, that the revenue the administration needs to provide government services must come solely from taxing the people and firms of the country.

Indeed, they are so captive to this backward idea that they are seemingly incapable of understanding the necessity of a Government possessing profitable state enterprises that can earn revenue for the Government — revenue that can be applied towards providing the services that the people need.

Clearly, Mr Kyffin Simpson’s company wishes to acquire the BNTCL because it is a profitable enterprise that will earn valuable revenue for the SOL group of companies for many many years into the future.

Well, why can’t Mr Stuart and Mr Sinckler appreciate that we — the citizens of Barbados — wish to continue to own our BNTCL for precisely the same reason ? We are not merely interested in receiving a one-off payment of sixty or eighty Million dollars for our BNTCL ! Rather, we wish to continue to have ownership of this valuable company and have it deliver annual profits for us for many decades to come.

Over the past twenty-five years Barbados has been plagued by silly and treacherous governments that have privatized and divested such valuable and profitable state enterprises as the Insurance Corporation of Barbados, the Barbados National Bank, Barbados External Telecommunications, and the Pine Hill Dairy. And now they propose to sell off the “jewel in the Crown” — the BNTCL.

The message that the successive pro-privatization Administrations have been sending us is that they are of the view that all profitable enterprises that are capable of earning revenue for their owners must be in the hands of the Private Sector, and that Government is to only own unprofitable, loss-making enterprises !

How stupid and backward this thinking is !

____________________________________________________________________________________

Original Press Release issued
CLEMENT  PAYNE  MOVEMENT  OF  BARBADOS
 
 
PRESS  RELEASE
 
 
WE  DENOUNCE  THE  DECISION  TO  APPROVE  THE  SALE  OF  THE  BNTCL
 
The Clement Payne Movement denounces BOTH  the initial decision of the current Democratic Labour Party (DLP) administration to privatize our state-owned Barbados National Terminal Co. Ltd. (BNTCL) by selling it to Mr Kyffin Simpson’s SOL group of companies and the recent decision of the Fair Trading Commission to approve the said sale.
Indeed, we consider the actions of the Freundel Stuart administration to be particularly disgraceful, in light of the fact that they contested (and won)  the 2013 General Elections on an anti-privatization platform .
Not only did they solemnly promise the Barbadian people that a re-elected DLP Government would preserve our state-owned enterprises, but they also assured us that they were saving us from dastardly BLP privatization intentions!
Needless-to-say, they shamefully betrayed this solemn undertaking by entering into a contract with Mr Simpson’s conglomerate to sell it not just “a” state-owned enterprise, but to sell it the single most valuable and profitable enterprise owned by us, the people of Barbados .
But, not only is the Stuart administration guilty of deceit and treachery, it is also guilty of being captive to a very backward and reactionary right-wing concept of governance.
You see, Mr Stuart’s administration– like virtually all other elements of the current Barbadian political class — seems to believe that a government must be run solely and totally on the basis of taxation. In other words, that the revenue the administration needs to provide government services must come solely from taxing the people and firms of the country.
Indeed, they are so captive to this backward idea that they are seemingly incapable of understanding the necessity of a Government possessing profitable state enterprises that can earn revenue for the Government — revenue that can be applied towards providing the services that the people need.
Clearly, Mr Kyffin Simpson’s company wishes to acquire the BNTCL because it is a profitable enterprise that will earn valuable revenue for the SOL group of companies for many many years into the future.
Well, why can’t Mr Stuart and Mr Sinckler appreciate that we — the citizens of Barbados — wish to continue to own our BNTCL for precisely the same reason ? We are not merely interested in receiving a one-off payment of sixty or eighty Million dollars for our BNTCL ! Rather, we wish to continue to have ownership of this valuable company and have it deliver annual profits for us for many decades to come.
Over the past twenty-five years Barbados has been plagued by silly and treacherous governments that have privatized and divested such valuable and profitable state enterprises as the Insurance Corporation of Barbados, the Barbados National Bank, Barbados External Telecommunications, and the Pine Hill Dairy. And now they propose to sell off the “jewel in the Crown” — the BNTCL.
The message that the successive pro-privatization Administrations have been sending us is that they are of the view that all profitable enterprises that are capable of earning revenue for their owners must be in the hands of the Private Sector, and that Government is to only own unprofitable, loss-making enterprises !
How stupid and backward this thinking is !
 
 
DAVID  COMISSIONG
 
PRESIDENT

64 responses to “Clement Payne Movement Denounce the DLP Decision to Privatize the BNTCL”

  1. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    This is what Worrell said and just as I thought…it is a waste of time selling SOL or anyone else the oil terminal, just to end up at the same DEFAULT place in 3 months…..a failed government. ..with LEC on the brain.

    “However, even if Government is able to get the US$100 million it is asking for, Worrell does not believe it will make a big difference to the country’s bottom line at this stage, given a high fiscal deficit in excess of five per cent of gross domestic product, a national debt of over 100 per cent of GDP and less than $600 million international reserves….”

  2. Well Well & Cut N' Paste At Your Service Avatar
    Well Well & Cut N’ Paste At Your Service

    barbadostoday is saying that Worrell is saying:

    “The former Central Bank Governor warns that Barbados’ dollar faces devaluation.”

    A failed government.


  3. @Dee Word and Sargeant

    Your objections were noted, the original press release was inserted this morning in blue.


  4. ” Commission is of the view that there are no available behavioral remedies which would adequately address the anti-competitive concerns in the transaction as currently structured.”

    Remedies to correct dominant and potentially abusive behavior can be either behavioral or structural. Behavioral remedies obligate SOL to do something or stop doing something in order to alleviate anti-competitive concerns. it requires ongoing administrative oversight by the FTC.
    Structural remedies need less FTC oversight but would require SOL to sever or divest part of the combined entity in order to eliminate some of their market power and control.
    The Commission has commented on the former but not the latter. Why?

  5. Jeff Cumberbatch Avatar

    Structural remedies need less FTC oversight but would require SOL to sever or divest part of the combined entity in order to eliminate some of their market power and control.
    The Commission has commented on the former but not the latter. Why?

    @ Tony Gibbs, Perhaps none was proposed…

  6. Let's Not Remember the FAILED DLP Avatar
    Let’s Not Remember the FAILED DLP

    Which Minister(s) managed to get a whole gas station in 6ROADS as part of the BNTCL deal?

  7. Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim. Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim.

    The fact of the matter remains:

    BNTCL is a monopoly.

    It is only profitable because it enjoys a monopoly.

    The ‘income’ it earns is simply another tax on fuel collected in a different way and without the benefit to the consumer of competition.

    SOL and RUBIS should make application to open competing terminals and take any gov’t resistance to the FTC.

    This entire affair has been handled ass-backwards.

    Gov’t’s job is to LEGISLATE, REGULATE AND FACILITATE, NOT OPERATE.

    No gov’t enterprise should be competing against tax-paying companies or individuals.


  8. @ Frustrated B
    Agree with you EXCEPT for the following:

    “It is only profitable because it enjoys a monopoly.”

    Properly managed, with competent and visionary leadership, it could be even MORE profitable EVEN if not enjoying monopoly status.

    Is there a reason that you always seem to exclude the potential impact of WISDOM?

  9. Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim. Avatar
    Frustrated Businessman: Animal Farm sequel playing out in Bim.

    Bushy, we cannot defeat the Laws of Natural Selection.

    All the inbreeding does is postpone the inevitable extinction.

    Monopolies are, by description, incestuous.

    Without competition among and between species, all the unsurvivable traits will flourish and the necessary survival attributes will diminish.

    No-one who understands simple nature could ever support a monopoly.


  10. Statue of Lord Nelson in Bridgetown, Barbados defaced – Nation News.

  11. David Comissiong Avatar

    Private Sector monopolies are to be avoided, but there is nothing intrinsically wrong with a publicly owned (state) monopoly. Such a monopoly is owned by all of us– the citizens of the nation– and whatever profits it makes because of its advantages as a monopoly become the property of all of US– the citizens and taxpayers of the country– income / revenue that can then be used to provide the services that we Citizens need.

    DAVID COMISSIONG

  12. David Comissiong Avatar

    The following is an extract from the letter that the CLEMENT PAYNE MOVEMENT sent to the FTC in January 2017 objecting to the privatization of the BNTCL by way of sale to the SOL group of companies. The extract constitutes a defense of the BNTCL as a public sector monopoly :_

    “It is difficult – if not impossible – to conceive of a more efficient arrangement than the one that exists now, with the state-owned entity fairly and even – handedly servicing all of the private sector retail companies, and at the same time looking out for the consumer by settling for a rate of return that is extremely modest and yet still sizeable enough to enable the enterprise to make a more than reasonable profit for the Government and people of Barbados. Thus, one CANNOT argue that the proposed merger will bring any gains in efficiencies, much less any gains that would be capable of off-setting the obvious ill effects of the limitation on competition that the merger would cause.”


  13. @Frustrated,your argument falls rather flat when one considers that SOL applied to effect the same monopoly — for at least the next 15 years.

    Are you suggesting that RUBIS would have had all grounds to petition to operate a competing facility were that application approved??

    And what benefice in a small market as ours for three minimal refineries when the job can be done effectively and rationally by one.

    The problem in not the monopoly itself as Commissiong states above…rather it is who gains the profits.

    I suspect the business community drools at milking that cash cow. Just as the greedy pols seek to feather their retirements and give SOL the vast millions in future profits.

  14. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Jeff Cumberbatch November 29, 2017 at 8:14 AM

    On the face of it one can conclude that the FTC’s decision is one of forcing those two secret lovers to privately kiss and makeup by way of a proper commercial marriage.

    We are willing to place ‘all-in’ to bet that the FTC (under your astute guidance) would have been most favourably inclined to bring this economic SOS divestment to a more timely clear-cut conclusion if both ‘competing’ parties had entered into a joint-venture ownership and operating arrangement. The finished petroleum market in Barbados is far too small for a duplication of storage and distribution facilities.

    The absence of economies of scale in a sunset industry would preclude Rubis from investing in its own facility to ‘rival’ the SOL aka BNTCL existing storage facility.

    The BNTCL is a supplier of an undifferentiated product whose only value added downstream is the location and appearance of the retail outlets of the so-called marketing companies.

    They are forced by a price control environment to charge the same price to the ignorant customers who think they are buying an imaginary ‘different and better’ product from either Rubis or SOL or even Texaco, Esso or Shell.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading