Submitted by Heather Cole

Dear Sir,

Re: Emergency Request – The Mortgage Crisis in Barbados

There is a very disturbing ad in today’s Sunday Sun of July 2nd, 2017. The Republic Bank has listed for Sale by tender no less than 17 properties in Barbados. It may perhaps be the tip of the iceberg as the meltdown of the mortgage crisis starts to manifest itself.

It is the dream of every Barbadian to own a piece of the rock and to build a home. It represents more to the average Barbadian than the right to vote. It means a fixed place of abode, forever removing the stigma associated with the chattel house which rested on land that they did not own and could be removed at the owner’s pleasure.

That dream seems to be swiftly vanishing. One would have thought that the novelty of social mobility from the chattel house to a permanent fixture would have come with some merits that would foster protection by government.

While government can squarely be blamed for digging the pit for the homeowners to fall into as it has not provided them with the necessary legislation for their assistance, the banks are also to blame. They appear to be a willing accomplice to government’s action, comparable to pulling the trigger of a loaded gun to ensure that the homeowners do not escape the fate of death and subsequently fall into the pit.

The commercial banks in Barbados are sitting on over $15 Billion dollars. They will not topple over and die. No bank has a need for a place to rest its head at night or food to eat. It is significant to note that it is the preference of the commercial banks to foreclose on Barbadians and then sell the debt at a % of what is owed. This has an effect on the landscape; there are many unoccupied houses that will become vandalised and overgrown with bush as the banks are unable to sell. For Barbadians it is not a sellers’ market or a buyers’ Market.

There is not enough money in circulation.

What should also have us all worried is that this debt will be bought by foreign entities taking the land away from the persons whose navel strings are buried on the island. The people who live in Syria and Saudi Arabia should not be owners of land in Barbados.

As the mortgage crisis is now in full swing, I thought it best to read up on CAP 236 to find out what relief was written into that section of the Laws of Barbados to offer relief to Barbadians.

I was left in shock. Not only does the law not offer any relief or protection to the mortgagor, it appears to have been written in favour of the lending company. After 50 years of independence and the creation of a vibrant middle class, one would have at least thought that by now the laws would be on the people’s side.

There are no identified rights for the mortgagor. The law offers no protection to the investment of the homeowner and that is wrong. All of the covenants are in dire need of revision. S113 states that it is the duty of the mortgagor to act in good faith and have regard for the mortgagee. There is however no reciprocal statement that the mortgagee should also act in like manner to the mortgagor.

If Barbados truly is a nation of Laws, the laws must reflect the social, political and economic well being of all of its people; not for one class and against another; not for the rich and against the poor; not for the companies and against the consumers; not for the banks and against their customers.

In essence this Act as it relates to mortgages is socially unjust. Perhaps it has never been challenged and the time is now ripe to challenge if they do not provide equitable solutions to the mortgage crisis that the island is now facing.

Presently, government can offer some relief based on the Act. It has the authority to change interest and set rates. However, one hopes that government understands that this is a crisis and a crisis that will not only affect middle class housing but will have an effect on every social and economic situation on the island. Whether rich or poor when families are stable, communities thrive. Societies with vibrant middle classes always thrive. Refusing to act now will put the entire Barbadian middle class at risk of survival and reopening an avenue to drive the country back into a time when only the very rich and the poor existed.

In my opinion, it is in the best interest of the people for government to:

  1. Have the courts enforce an emergency stay on those 17 properties that the Republic Bank has advertised for sale on July 7th, 2017.
  2. Have the courts enforce an emergency stay on any property that has already been offered or advertised for sale by any commercial bank or financial institution registered to conduct business in Barbados.
  3. Set a moratorium on the sale of properties mortgaged by the commercial banks or financial institutions registered to conduct business in Barbados until such time as a national solution to this crisis has been devised.

I am offering my assistance to help create an equitable solution to this crisis. I await your urgent response.

Sincerely,

Heather Cole

cc: The Leader of the Opposition

61 responses to “Open Letter to the Prime Minister – The Simmering Mortgage Crisis”


  1. @Hal, you are either thin skinned per the blog master or insufferable per your above riposte to @BT. Oh heavens to murgatroyd!

    In your sophisticated financial markets the execs implemented this said MIG and according to you, in London debated it for over 365 days before banning it. Are we to understand from that they were ‘ignorant’ of what exactly was proposed or simply there was a desire to squeeze more revenue from an already contrived market disadvantageous to the lender.

    Maybe you can channel the other BU experts like Jeff and use wit and pithy quotes to blunt the incoming ordinance. Or is thin skinned n insufferable just a part of your St.Giles DNA. LOLL.

    But good reading. Incidentally for all your broadside re local regulatory deficiencies (valid tho they be) you surely know well the various regulatory ‘holes’ and deficiencies which facilitated the various debacles about which your paper filled it’s pages!

    Not to mix subjects or metaphors but the backlash of details coming from the Grenfell tragedy is another example of a so-called sophisticated market acting as blatantly crass, corrupt and negligent based principally on greed as any third world pissant country. In cases like that the culpable sophisticates deserve that guillotine the Pacha loves to invoke.


  2. Let me try to inject a bit of clarity? Into the discussion. A rereading of Hal’s initial submission and his subsequent follow ups reveal that some of us (myself included) may be speaking about two different things. Hal is speaking of Mortgage Default Insurance which the lender normally requires if the borrower has a small amount for this transaction (let’s say 10%) to contribute to the purchase/construction of a home. In that scenario if the borrower defaults, the Mortgage holder (let’s say the Bank) can apply to the insurance to pay the balance of the mortgage. The Insurance company can then sell the property to satisfy the mortgage holder and it will be responsible for any shortfall (if the home sells for less than the outstanding balance) and pay any excess to the homeowner. In all cases the Default Insurance amount is a lump sum payment and included in the Mortgage which could add considerable amount to the Mortgage over its lifetime.

    The requirement to have Mortgage Default Insurance may be waived if the borrower has 25% or more (the percentage may be more or less depending on ones jurisdiction) but I would think that because Barbados has mostly Canadian Banks they would apply the 25% rule currently in existence in Canada.

    Borrowers may be wise to take out term insurance to cover the life of the Mortgage or Mortgage Insurance to protect their love ones from being shown the door in the event their demise would mean loss of home.


  3. Thanks Sargeant, agree we all went down another path. Here is what is says on the CIBC website. One gets the impression that the customer has the option to go elsewhere because it is not a widespread requirement in the market. Will have to check it out.

    https://www.cibc.com/fcib/insurance/home.html


  4. @ Sargeant

    Hal Austin’s perspective on the issue would be much clearer if he could try as hard as he possibly could to resist including derogatory and sarcastic remarks about other contributors who may understand or agree with him, because he believes he is intellectually superior and us folk in Barbados are backward.

    He needs to change his attitude.


  5. @ Artax re Hal…
    He needs to change his attitude.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Why…?
    It would then not be Hal…..
    He has always been defined by exactly that attitude… at least from school.

    What would help is if he admitted his general ignorance of realities on the ground in Barbados. His insistence that whatever pertains in his adopted English plantation applies in our (in his mind) colony…. is becoming quite irritating…

    …but for Hal that is how the cookie crumbles.


  6. Thanks Sargeant. In Canada the CMHC insures those with small down payments. The purchaser is always advised to buy mortgage insurance to the value of the mortgage in case of death. A Bajan here in Ottawa had mortgage insurance. When his wife up and died two years after marriage with no children he was home free with clear titlew. It was a fairly large house to boot.

  7. Vincent Haynes Avatar
    Vincent Haynes

    Hmmmm……and then…..
    NSRL better than lay offs, says Stuart
    Prime Minister Freundel Stuart says he understands the cries of residents and businesses alike over the $542 million austerity package announced by Minister of Finance Chris Sinckler in his recent Budget. However, speaking on the sidelines…
    barbadostoday.bb
    https://www.barbadostoday.bb/2017/07/08/nsrl-better-than-lay-offs-says-stuart/


  8. Heather et al:
    “…should not be owners of land in Barbados.”
    People, welcome to the world go Capitalism. Operating in a free market like Barbados, unless restrictions are made on the ownership of property; which is protected by the Constitution, then anyone from wherever have the protection to purchase any property they desire. Barbados is not a dictatorship. When a contract is signed; as in the case of a purchase, and the exchange of money, the terms of the contract must be adhered to. Thus a person signing a contract (mortgage) to purchase, must adhere to the terms of the contract, which provides for foreclosure in the event of default. A person, in anticipation of difficulties in adhering to these terms, can aooriach the lending institution and negotiate better terms. A bank does not “force” anyone to accept their terms. these are subject to negotiations. The BANKS NEED TO LEND, SO THE BORROWER CAN NEGOTIATE , OR SEEK ANOTHER INSTITUTION THAT WILL OFFR BETTER RATES AND TERMS.
    HEATHER, YOU SHOULD HAVE LERNED FROM THE RECENT WORLD WIDE FINANCIAL MELTDOWN. HOW MNY THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ALL OVER NORTH AMERICA WERE FORECLOSED UPON? GOVERNMENT CANNOT provide the type of coverage and protection that you seek to make them provide. The individual has the responsibility to live within his means; which includes provision and foresight for downturns in the economy. The days of a job for life; in Government or private, are over.

  9. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Alvin Cummins July 14, 2017 at 6:52 PM
    “People, welcome to the world go Capitalism. Operating in a free market like Barbados…”

    So why are you so much opposed to “Privatization”? What would be so wrong should the GAIA be sold or leased on a long-term basis?

    “The days of a job for life; in Government or private, are over.”

    Is this a contrite acceptance of things to come in the coming months?

    You have fired some of the cleaners, maids and gardeners who used to keep Barbados clean and attractive, now is the time to shed some of the real fat; aka excess to ‘superfluous’ requirements in the middle and top of the parasitic army of bureaucratic occupation.

    Why not fire some the butlers (hanger-ons), incompetent accountants, pseudo lawyers, apologetic parliamentary secretaries and obese ministers mainly without any substantive portfolios?


  10. Now that Barbadians have discovered the power of mass movement, and the positive significance of the private sector and unions working together, can we now expect a joint attempt to bring banks in to line, given that the banks are enemies, not of the state, but of consumers and small businesses?


  11. Oh buzz off Hal
    ..are you no longer afraid of the RSS?

Leave a Reply to Hal AustinCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading