Submitted by David A. Comissiong, Coordinator, International Network  In Defense of Humanity Caribbean Chapter
maduro
President Nicolas Maduro

It is critically important that the Governments and people of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) acquire an accurate understanding of precisely what is going on in our sister Caribbean nation of Venezuela — a nation that the powerful United States of America (USA) has perversely designated as a “national security threat” to the USA.

And we will never  achieve any such “accurate understanding” if we depend on Western media institutions for our information about Venezuela !

The reality is that the government  of the USA has determined that the United Socialist Party  (PSUV) administration of Venezuela is their enemy, and they are therefore currently engaged in a multi-faceted campaign to bring down the Administration of President Nicolas Maduro by any means necessary. And central to this “campaign” is a strategy of “Psychological Warfare” in which the media is assigned a critical role.

It is against this background that I now hereby CALL upon the governments of CARICOM to designate and send a SPECIAL  ENVOY to Venezuela for the purpose of investigating the situation “on the ground” and making an informed analysis of the Venezuelan reality and the role that CARICOM can and should play.

I am also CALLING upon the media houses of the English-speaking Caribbean to do likewise, and to send an investigative team to Venezuela to see for themselves and to deliver to our people an independent and objective “Caribbean” assessment of the situation in Venezuela.

And I am making these CALLS against a background of my having visited Venezuela on several occasions and finding the reality that I witnessed with my own eyes significantly at odds with the impressions and images presented by the powerful Western media corporations !

I am fully aware that “Psychological Warfare” is a very real phenomenon, and that it is routinely deployed against regimes that the USA and other powerful Western nations determine to be their “enemy”.

Indeed, in 2004 – a full two years before Julian Assange launched his whistleblowing Wikileaks internet-based organisation – the late President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela publicised documents which disclosed that the United States of America’s National Endowment for Democracy” (NED) had been funding several Venezuelan non -governmental organisations that were opposed to Chavez’s socialist Government .

Furthermore, subsequent disclosures of confidential US State Department diplomatic cables by Wikileaks proved that the  foreign US interference discovered by Chavez was just the tip of the iceberg! Indeed, the Wikileaks documents confirmed that over the 15 years of Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution, the US Embassy in Venezuela and such US governmental agencies as the US Agency for International Development (USAID) had been hard at work funding Opposition NGO’s and activists; allocating funds to right-wing political parties for subversive actions against the socialist Government; and organising and training selected youth and student leaders in the use of social networks to mobilise political action against the Venezuelan Government.

In fact, the US agencies actually sent middle and upper class Venezuelan student leaders to the USA for workshops and conferences on Internet activism and networking, inclusive of training in how to promote regime change via street riots and the strategic use of the mass media to portray Chavez’s government as repressive. Indeed, so massive was the US financial assistance to the “disloyal” Opposition forces of Venezuela, that a March 2009 State Department cable from the US Embassy in Caracas frankly stated – “Without our continued assistance, it is possible that the organisations we helped create…. could be forced to close…. Our funding will provide those organisations a much needed lifeline.”

Why, you may well ask, has the US Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to destroy the socialist Government of Venezuela? Well, the simple answer is that the US Government and the powerful Capitalist oligarchy that is located at the core of the US Government, have identified Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution as  one of the most potent and deadly threats to the continued existence of their imperialistic Capitalistic system.

Let us remember that :-

(1)   Chavez and his broad, grass-roots based Fifth Republic Movement came to power in Venezuela in 1998, and immediately declared their intention to challenge the system of Neo -Liberal Capitalism. Thereafter, under the inspiration of Simon Bolivar – the father of Latin American independence – Chavez championed a return to concepts of Latin American nationalism and unity, and to an up-dated 21st century system of Socialism.

(2)   It was Chavez and the government of Venezuela that led the attack that defeated the Americans and scuttled their “Free Trade Area of the Americas” (FTAA). Chavez then followed up this success by boldly taking the initiative and proposing  the establishment of the “Bolivarian Alternative For Latin America and the Caribbean” (ALBA) – a hemisphere wide integration scheme based upon the values of solidarity, mutual support, egalitarianism, collective cooperation, and a planned and democratic sharing of resources.

(3)  Over the fifteen years of Chavez’s Bolivarian Revolution the fundamental ALBA concept guided Venezuela and the other countries of Latin America and the Caribbean to such progressive, anti-imperialist developments as the Petro Caribe Energy Cooperation Agreement, the Television Network of the South (Telesur), the Union of South American States (UNASUR), the international Bank of the South (Bancosur), the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), the Africa/South America Summit, the international eye care programme known as “Operation Milagro“, and the list goes on. Needless-to-say, these developments constitute a fundamental and revolutionary challenge to US dominance of the western hemisphere, a geographical region that they have always contemptuously regarded as their “backyard”.

(4)   In addition, for the very first time in Venezuela’s history, the tremendous wealth generated by Venezuela’s oil industry- the fourth largest in the world – was wrenched out of the hands of the traditional elite caste of Venezuela and their North American allies, and was instead directed towards fuelling the socio-economic development of the masses of the poor and deprived of Venezuela.

(5)   The Bolivarian Revolution delivered such benefits to the people of Venezuela as a 50 per cent reduction in poverty, free healthcare, free high quality education from primary school to university, a substantial increase in wages for the working class, and as extension of pension rights to the entire population. In addition, the  socialist State provides subsidies which go towards guaranteeing affordable food and housing for the most needy, as well as providing job training and worker placement programmes.

(6)   But in spite of these remarkable achievements the Venezuelan elite and their North American allies have never relented in their hostility to the Bolivarian Revolution! Indeed, there is nothing new about the middle and upper class organised campaign of economic sabotage and street protest that is now on-going against the Nicholas Maduro Administration. The same things, and worse, were directed at the late President Hugo Chavez and his Administration!

It would do us well to recall the crisis that Chavez (and Venezuela) faced in 2002 when the Venezuelan elite and their North American allies organised violent marches in the streets of Caracas; shot at and killed their own protestors and placed the blame on the Government; hoarded basic consumer items; and sabotaged and scuttled the critical petroleum industry. And of course, the centrepiece of the crisis was the military coup that they staged – arresting Chavez, fabricating his resignation, ordering his execution, and dismantling the democratic institutions of governance such as the National Assembly and the Supreme Court.

It was the organised Venezuelan working class that intervened and came to the rescue of Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution in 2002! The masses of the people — organised in cooperatives, social movements, community based organisations, trade unions and neighbourhood associations – recognised that Chavez’s Revolution was their Revolution as well and defended it.

Clearly, the 2017 situation in Venezuela is not precisely the same as the situation in 2002. The main difference is that in 2002 the Government of the late Hugo Chavez was operating an economy in which international oil prices were a very health US $120 per barrel, whereas President Maduro has had to try to finance the governmental programmes and social services of Venezuela on the basis of a much weaker economy caused by a plummeting of international oil prices. We all need to remember that Maduro has had to face the misfortune of having to govern in a situation in which oil prices dropped as low as US $28 per barrel, resulting in an unavoidable scaling back of several of the programmes and services that working class Venezuelans depended on to sustain their livelihoods.

But the grass-roots working class organizations of Venezuela are NOT naïve organizations that are incapable of analyzing the political and economic situation for themselves and coming to the right conclusions !

In spite of the undoubted economic difficulties that Venezuelan masses currently face, it is my firm belief and expectation that the Venezuelan working class can and will do in 2017 exactly what they did in 2002 – they will defend and preserve their Revolution! All that they need from us— the people of Barbados and the Caribbean— is that we make the effort to dig through the  mass of lies and misinformation that the biased Western News media routinely puts out about the situation in Venezuela, and that we offer them our principled support and solidarity! And if some of us could rise up to the level of discerning the fundamental and critical historical truth that we too are deeply invested in the Bolivarian Revolution, that would be a most welcome bonus!

67 responses to “Call for CARICOM and Regional Media Practitioners to Visit Venezuela on Fact Finding Mission”


  1. Ping Pong

    You may well be right.

    But assume for the moment the Hyatt project is questionable and he exposes it.

    He goes to the head of the pack.

    Grenville Phillips et al cannot compete, but … they could join him.

    A group other than the two established parties going after corruption in Barbados will attract support based on pure merit.

    The DLP won years ago based on the ITAL legislation it was supposed to enact but nothing has happened.

    Are we going to just return to the BLP and its shenanigans?

    What is the difference between the BLP and DLP?

    The Court system could be used to delay and frustrate such a group but will a high profile name like Hyatt tolerate the delays and misuse of its brand that will be involved in such a course of action?

    We really don’t know the inner workings of the deal by which Hyatt is allowing the use of its name.

    We’ve seen what happened to Four Seasons, another high profile name.

    Such a group could put the Barbadian system of corruption between a rock and a hard place.

    Labelling Commissiong as an enemy of the state is not a sensible track to take and makes me think along the lines I am thinking.

    This one is going to be interesting and worth watching as it unfolds.


  2. Commissiong was not singled out as an enemy of the state.

    Kellman used the plural

    It is a group he targeted

    Scary!!

    But it also shows fear!!


  3. Opponents of the DLP does not=enemies of the state.

  4. Vincent Haynes Avatar
    Vincent Haynes

    From 1980 onwards, Venezuelan corruption has remained high. Particularly grave was the administration of Pres. Jaime Lusinchi from 1984-94, which saw some $36,000,000,000 pilfered or stolen mainly through a corrupt exchange control program, according to an estimate by Venezuelan sociologist Ruth Capriles at the Caracas Andres Bello Catholic University. Soaring corruption during the Lusinchi period resulted from several factors, including weak political institutions, lack of administrative controls, too much money circulating in the financial system of the government, and, above all, populist leaders promoting a welfare state in which hard work and social discipline were not encouraged. In 1997, the Caracasbased nongovernment organization Pro Calidad de Vida estimated that some $100,000,000,000 in oil income had been wasted or stolen during the last 25 years.

    As the 20th century came to an end, Venezuela was ripe for significant political change. The main contenders in the 1998 presidential election-paratrooper Hugo Chavez and former Governor of the State of Carabobo, Henrique Salas-promised radical political change. Venezuelans perceived Chavez as someone who looked and spoke like them and could, therefore, represent them better. His electoral promises were crucial in winning the votes of the majority.

    In his inaugural speech, in January 1999, Chavez called for a “political revolution” before tackling social or economic issues. Taking advantage of the popular euphoria following his victory-and in violation of the existing constitution-he convoked a Constituent Assembly possessing absolute power to write a new constitution and to “redefine the state.” This Assembly, made up of his followers, went on to dissolve the democratically elected Congress and dismiss all the members of the Supreme Court, as well as the Attorney General, the General Comptroller, and most of the judges in the country, only to replace them with bureaucrats loyal to the president. In a letter to the Supreme Court, Chavez stated that “the president had exclusive authority on the management of state affairs,” thus appearing to place himself above the law.

    In November 1999, the new Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jose Vicente Rangel, gave a speech in which he put forward the position of the government regarding corruption. He said that, from then on, public office would follow ethical norms, that corruption had already cost Venezuela too much in economic, social, and spiritual terms, and that the new judicial system and the new Civic Power, incorporated in the new constitution, would combine to combat corruption. That is not what has occurred, however.

  5. Vincent Haynes Avatar
    Vincent Haynes

    Ping Pong May 9, 2017 at 8:37 PM #

    Venezuela is a prime example of what befalls a country when twits are put in charge.
    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

    hmm……seems like the twits been in charge for a long time……a country gets the govt. it deserves……just like us……who are we to complain?

    You should have taken time out to read the Cato report.


  6. http://epaper.barbadostoday.bb/launch.aspx?eid=eba7f839-992e-4876-b3da-75311ef7f6a3&pnum=4

    “The attorney had also argued that Stuart had relied on an outdated Physical Development Plan even though Section 11 (1) of the Town and Country Planning Act stipulates that the plan, which is now 14 years old, must be updated every five years. He also took issue with the 15-storey elevation, pointing out that the maximum height allowed for beachfront hotels was five storeys, compared to seven storeys for non-beachfront tourist accommodation”

    This is the simple point relating to the building of Hyatt.

    FOLLOW THE LAW ….. YOUR LAW ….. OUR LAW!!

    That is the link between Venezuela and Hyatt … an unwillingness to follow the law of the land.

    Venezuela is in our faces at the same time as Hyatt perhaps for a reason.

    When the Scotland District Association was heard by Frank King more than 20 years ago the same principle applied.

    His notes should be available.

    The outdated PDP existing at the time had made the area Zone 1 because of the springs that fed it and the possibility of accessing the water for public use.

    By now we can figure out that we do actually have a water problem.

    There was no provision made for the National Dump and the whole area was about to be designated as a National Park.

    Dismissing the matter on a technicality relieved the court 20 years ago of the need to address the law as stated and deal with the other issues.

    Had it done so, perhaps there would be no need for Commissiong to once again, bring the matter to court.

    The imposition of a $60,000 security cost order effectively prevented the matter being appealed after the finding on a technicality.

    Commissiong just has to watch he crosses his T’s and dots his I’s otherwise the old technicality stunt will be pulled on him!!

    …. but I think it would only be a raving lunatic who could oppose his right to ask the court as a citizen of Barbados that his government obey the law.

    It will be interesting to see how this one pans out.

    A new PDP is on the horizon.

    Wonder if it will change the requirement of the old one as the number of storeys allowed.


  7. Like DC,Ancel Roget and his oilfield workers are demonstrating their support for comrade Maduro.Like DC they are blaming the western media for fake news.I see even the poor pensioners are marching and saw one,an old guy,pelting a ‘rock stone’at the police.Things must be tough when Maduro was so Trump like enraged by his minister of health that he fired the minister forthwith.All the minister did was to say people are dying because of lack of medicines and they things have got much worse under Maduro and his non sensical policies.If Staurt and Baloney had their way D.C. would be silenced and in prison.Thats the difference between Venezuela and Barbados.


  8. I do not know if it is capitalism or socialism that has caused Venezuela to suffer shortages of food and medicine. However it is clear to me that whatever one calls the policies of the Maduro government it is those policies that has led to misery.


  9. Listened to a commentator on one of the cable networks described those who support the Chavez and now Maduro as suffering from ideological necrophilia.


  10. The removal of the 25000 tax allowance and the imposition of a tax on foreign exchange transfers (wire transfers for payment of goods, education, health care including credit card purchases etc) which will be implemented on 30 May will push Barbados into Venezuela like misery. Not even a change of Government will save us now.

  11. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Ping Pong May 14, 2017 at 6:07 PM

    You can bet those measures are under active consideration.

    But it would be a rather foolish move indeed. These would be clear signs of the first major waves caused by the approaching economic tsunami that would push Barbados eventually in the same economic doldrums as Venezuela.

    That’s what happens when idiots are put in charge of serious business.


  12. I have received reports that Trinidad is considering a tax on credit card transactions.


  13. @ Ping Pong
    You are an intelligent blogger…
    Trinidad is one of the very worse places on Earth IBHO…. a lot like India in terms of the internal wickedness, uncleanliness, and the corruption that dominate the society.

    When they experienced that oil bonanza during the period of bullish oil prices, they were so flushed with money that, like the prodigal son, they could afford to live large and in charge- and did this, RATHER THAN INVEST IN SOLVING BASIC INTERNAL PROBLEMS such as gangs, racism, corruption, crime, and low productivity….
    Now, like the prodigal son – when the money from his inheritance ran out, they begin to “see hell”.

    There is NO WAY out of chaos for T&T unless oil prices skyrocket again – and even then, their customers are mostly in no position to pay – so demand may be low, and downward competitive pressure on price may be quite high…

    But wait!!!
    …these same doomed Trickidadians now practically own Barbados… and have the power to make major financial decisions on ‘our’ behalf…..
    Well we all know (from 400 years of slavery) that when our OWNERS start to see hell, WE can expect to actually FEEL it…

    You gotta asbestos suit Ping…?


  14. Bush Tea

    I am dressing according to instructions given in Ephesians 6: 10 – 18.


  15. […] via Call for CARICOM and Regional Media Practitioners to Visit Venezuela on Fact Finding Mission — Bar… […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading