Caswell Franklyn,  Unity Workers Union
Caswell Franklyn, Unity Workers Union

I must confess to a longstanding admiration for Prime Minister Freundel Stuart’s command and use of the English language. Oftentimes, when I hear him speak, I would jot down his words in the hope that some day I would be able to express myself similarly. I am sure that I am not the only one who is awed by his turn of phrase. However, I must caution that pretty words do not necessarily equate to knowledge of any particular subject, no matter how eloquent the speaker happens to be. Unfortunately, every time he ventures into the realm of industrial relations, he makes statements that suggest that he has a mere superficial knowledge of the subject. His pronouncements on the dispute that surrounds the reversion of NUPW president, Akanni McDowall, is just one such example.

Mr. Stuart contends, “we are departing from well established industrial relations procedures” that have served this country well through the last 50 years of our independence. Mind you, these procedures sprang from the Social Partnership that he once labelled as a philosophical absurdity, when he had clearer vision in his younger days as a member of the Opposition. Now older and as Prime Minister, he seems to be the champion of the procedures that were develop by the same absurdity that he predicted would emasculate the labour movement. His prediction has come true. In opposition that prospect worried him but now in government, he wants us to believe that he is so magnanimous that he will protect the labour movement for the benefit of the country as a whole.

The PM was quoted in the Daily Nation of November 17, 2016 as having said:

I have thought it quite irregular that while discussions are going on and clarifications are being sought, that industrial action should be instituted. I say that is not the way we have done things in Barbados over the years.

The NUPW believes that its president has been victimised for his activity as a trade union leader. As far as it is concerned the actions of the Personnel Administration Division (PAD) are also quite irregular and such behaviour merits immediate industrial action for this gross violation of industrial relations norms. Nothing less would suffice. If the union cannot protect its president from victimisation by the employer, it would be useless to protect the average member. This is a battle that the NUPW cannot afford to lose. No self-respecting union would allow any employer to victimise its president for speaking out in defence of its members. The PM must understand that the union is fighting for its survival in these circumstances.

So far, PAD has issued a statement detailing the sequence of events that led to McDowall’s reversion but has failed miserably to convince any impartial observer that political interference in the Public Service was not the motive that set the ball rolling. I am not impartial in this situation; I am an opponent of NUPW and most likely would benefit from any fallout but the perception of political victimisation is too powerful for me to go into any self interest mode. This assault on NUPW deserves to be met by a clear response from all unions. Failing that, it will only be a matter of time before it is their turn.

If Mr. Stuart is so concerned about maintaining a stable industrial relations environment in this country, good sense would dictate that he should encourage both parties to the dispute to revert to the status quo ante while negotiations are on going. To do less would confirm that Government is only giving lip service to the concept of a strong, independent labour movement and only wants one that sings in its choir.

Finally, Mr. Stuart has threatened to fix the voluntarist system that he mistakenly believes obtains in the Public Service. To the PM, I say thanks but no thanks, the labour movement was doing just fine before politicians wormed their way into strategic positions in unions. All we ask is that you do your job of running the country and allow unions to get on with their business. And don’t believe for one minute that politicians have a monopoly on what is in the best interest of this country.

66 responses to “The Caswell Franklyn Column – Prime Minister Threatens Labour Movement Again”

  1. Retribution-things that make me go hum! Avatar
    Retribution-things that make me go hum!

    All of the DLP signs and traits were manifested even before the 2008 elections.


  2. Well attended all inclusive fetes and I phones make for an accurate assessment of the level of underpaid and overtaxed Barbadians.Add to that the fact that bigger and higher populated countries send smaller delegations to conferences than we do. Now more than ever I’m convinced that ac is a part of the treasonous bunch that uses Thursdays to choke the shit out of poor Bajans. Add wunna collective salaries to the list. That too bolsters your argument.


  3. Hamilton do not know why you are getting do all worked up. Nobody is forcing barbadians to join the celebratons but there are some of us who have benefited from barbados generosity in allowing us to have a free education no health care transportation at a cost wherein comparison to other large and more resourceful countries they kcost are much higher.
    I meaning what so wrong with a barbadian splurging a little TLC as a thank u to an island for its generosity for over 50th years.
    I hate to think you are among the selfcentred and ungrateful ones who can only take when necessary and forget to say thanks afterwards


  4. The DLP always had a leadership problem,as far back as PM, Barrow , EWB way of dealing with some MP/Ministers was, do what you like, the voters will deal with you, that attitude kept him as PM, the manifestation of corruption set in the DLP, all the others leaders of the DLP adopted the behavior of EWB and we the voters accepted it

  5. are-we-there-yet Avatar

    Watchman;

    Re. your 5:24 pm post.

    I think that your assessment of Barrow above was not altogether correct.

    Barrow dealt swiftly and firmly and even sometimes unfairly, with most Ministers or other underlings who transgressed and there are many examples of this including the firing of the late Dennis Hunte, Cammie Tudor’s nephew. However, with DaCosta Edwards, Barrow’s attempt to deal with him essentially backfired as “Joy” stood up to him manfully and indeed Barrow had to back down when they came into conflict.

    Joy Edwards had no fear of Barrow, unlike most of the others who feared but adulated him to the extent that subsequently some of them took on some of Barrow’s haughty, patrician idiosyncratic behaviours like apparently ignoring MInisters and public servants who met with him in his office by pretending to be sleeping while they were talking.

    Barrow was in the top tier of our Politicians but not near the status that would justify the pedestal on which Bajans have placed him.

  6. DLP (Formerly CBC) Radio and TV Avatar
    DLP (Formerly CBC) Radio and TV

    @ Caswell…your love of Freundel orative skills is…noted..and a little hilarious…BUT, I have seen and heard Freundel long enough to know that he is a Professional BULLSHITTER….look up the dictionary to find the definition of bullshiting…If bullshitting was a pro sport…Freundel would have the first franchise set up at him. His lastest…..croakings just confirms it for me….he is an embarrassment to the office of Prime Minister….He has made the office just as ceremonial as the Governor General….he has the leadership qualities of a fart…He avoids the public and when he does he says the most….colourful forms of nonsense on this 166 sq mile rock..
    On the Akanni Mcdowall issue…de IDIOTS on this blog that think that we born yesterday and DEM born the day before just trying to insult the intelligence of right thinking people. I am also HIGHLY OFFENDED by the political polarization this “gov’t”…is using as a weapon to try to mute people….I want to know if Donville Inniss does truly believe the nonsense that comes out of his own mouth!!!!….IT IS THE GOV’T THAT MADE THIS ISSUE POLITICAL IN DE FIRST PLACE!!!!!..UP to now i have not heard one legitimate reason that someone would revert Mr McDowall prematurely without cause except for that fact that he is a so-called BEE and is the NUPW president!!!! IT IS ILLEGAL to do this to say the least…THERE IS OR SHOULD BE NO DLP BARBADOS OR BLP BARBADOS…ONLY ONE BARBADOS!!!!. When Leroy Trotman was the General Secretary of the BWU, or when Walter Maloney and Dennis Clarke was head of the NUPW no one heard of them being “targeted”…Why target Akanni???…because he is young and inexperienced!!!! This gov’t was stoking the fires of war by having its supporters going after Akanni….you wouldn’t think the NUPW wouldn’t react!!!! the senior civil servant that did this made a severe miscalculation…NO GOVT or its supporters…whether it be DLP, BLP NDP, UNC, PNP, ABC, CBC, UNICEF, IMF, RSPCA has the right to victimize ANYBOOODDYYYYY!!!!!!!!!


  7. @ are-we- there -yet

    Firing 2 senators, at a show off spot meeting, when the chips were down,man what that ? can you call taking away the functions of a Minister, but leaving the Minister still as a Minister to be swift and firm, unfair man, yes, that why Joy Edwards stood up to him, he was not top tier as a PM, or FAMILY man, he said all he got is for the people of St. John, they got rum, bake chicken wings and his presents sometimes


  8. Does anyone buy the argument offered today by David Ellis that Akanni has been more visible as president than his predecessors, overpowering the role of general secretary. Therefore he will attract attention (whatever that means).

  9. Caswell Franklyn Avatar

    David

    Even though David Ellis is an ass, he sometimes gets it right. The union has a full time paid general secretary that cannot be dismissed, demoted, reverted or anything else by the Government in order to avoid what happened to Akanni. He ventured into the role of the general secretary but that was not the Government’s role to fix. That is purely a matter for the NUPW. If the president overstepped his bounds and intruded into the role of the GS, the Government’s response should never have been breaking the law. It is a criminal offence for an employer to behave in the way that the Government did in this case. Maybe, the union should ask the DPP to intervene.


  10. “ac November 20, 2016 at 11:25 AM #

    Firstly i would not call any PM that have been elected a mule and a jacka.ss because in so doing the same assessment would be pointed towards those who have elected them.”

    True but doesn’t your view of President Trump mirror the above and please, please do not tell me you were speaking of Prime Ministers only.


  11. charles skeete

    my comments in reference to Trump is a reflection to and responses to those things he allegedly done or said


  12. This thread has run cold seems as if NUPW is getting a public tongue lashing and now form of disagreement has erupted among its ranks in relation to the go slow


  13. Whats going on at NUPW hearing there are rumblings not unusal as this type of going ons have been closely associated with who is in or should be in charge


  14. Caswell

    I hope the Unions are not running out of steam as some are wishing above.

    The membership must be convinced how critical this matter is to their future survival.


  15. my former work mate has once again change his political colours
    the RED shirt and come to the front and the BLUE has gone to the back .
    cant be trusted ?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading