Trump’s View About Women (Grab them by the Po**y)

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

Trumps has grabbed the headlines across the globe although for the wrong reason. His disparaging exchange with Billy Bush -captured on a hot mike- and exposed by the US media about women is sure to derail his presidential campaign. What it does is to setup tomorrow’s second presidential debate to attract unprecedented viewership.

It also brings into question to what extent should the electorate hold political aspirants/candidates accountable for personal views. Secondly, how active should traditional media be in sharing the personal views of candidates to informed a mostly ‘ignorant’ electorate. Social media cannot be accused of suppressing information.




  • “ac October 14, 2016 at 10:54 PM #

    Chad99999999..Trump made a false claim stating that he gave ten thousand dollars to a911 Fund but the statement was a blantant lie. How can you support such a cheap huckster and a low life dog.”

    Trump might be a loose cannon and unworthy as some say to be President but how can you support Obama in one breath and support in another Mrs Clinton who gave the public the impression she is for the Iran deal but calls it in discussions with her campaign team the worst deal since Neville Chamberlain handed Czechoslovakia to Hitler. What a devious individual and to think MRs Obama is forced to trumpet for her. Oh the hypocrisy of American politics. No wonder a political clown like Mr Trump has been able to garner such support.


  • Well Well & Consequences

    Chad is just supporting what he himself is, what he himself would do…he is being himself…that is the core of the Trump supporter in their weak state and their pack mentality.

    They never thought the fraud that is Trump would become unraveled before he slithered into the white house.., a calculated error for all of them, including Trump…lol


  • @ Money B
    Boss, Bushie has been looking at some of Killary’s leaked emails and, to be honest, if some of Bushie’s emails were leaked by Wikileaks it would be more damaging…. 🙂 , and judging from the shiite you write on BU, your private emails must be downright howlers…

    Shiite man…. surely you can come with something stronger against the damn woman.
    …and no nonsense about how she makes lots of money by speeches, endorsements etc…. Bushie is still trying to work out how Trump, Lawson and you make yours…

    Bushie is no supporter of women in leadership roles, but that presumes that there are MEN available to do the job. In the current circumstances where the alternatives are people of the ilk of Trump, Lawson and your good self, the people have NO CHOICE but to go with Hilary.

    The country is like a damn widow……. de men dead!

    Face it.
    Trump is a chump…


  • Trump has called into question his (and others’) assertion that Clinton would be a poor choice for President because she has displayed poor judgement and choices in a number of areas of relevance to leadership of the USA, other governments in its sphere of influence and indeed the World.

    But Trump’s horrific lack of proper judgment is evident in any balanced look at the numerous articles that speak to almost every aspect of his character. eg. Trump chose from very early in his campaign to attack Clinton on her husband’s proven infelicities rather than strategically drilling down on the clear political gaffes that she might have made in foreign policy etc.

    He chose to develop a campaign that seems to be heavily focused on Bill Clinton’s infelicities and trying to provide a tenuous link between Hillary (as enabler) and these infelicities, thereby losing the possibility of bringing all his ammunition to bear on possibly provable weaknesses in Hillary and thereby enhancing his chances to win against her.

    He arranges for an evident trickster to provide an alibi for him in the case of the 1st Class Airline groping gambit. The alibi cannot withstand scrutiny because of the person who gave it and the utterly unimaginable chances of that man being able to actually observe at all times the action of the two people in seats across from him in an airplane at that time where it is most unlikely that there would have been more than 2 seats side-by-side in the First class cabin. That alibi should have been left alone as it only tends to heap more circumstantial evidence against Trump and little for him.

    Trump’s railings against various groups suggest an enormous lack of judgement.

    His seeming alliances with traditional enemies of the USA and the appearance that he is unwilling to disengage from such alliances also suggest extremely poor judgement or an agenda that is not in accord with expectations from one who is seeking the presidency of the USA.

    Trump’s lack of judgement will destroy him if higher forces are not at work to ensure that he gets the presidency despite all odds, the majority of which are self inflicted.

    Meanwhile he and his campaign should be girdling their loins for the revelations from scores more of the women he has attacked over the years.

    I wonder if MoneyBrain and Lawson and Chad55555 have been noting that not one of the women who have come forward to claim that Trump has interfered with them is a black woman?. Food for thought eh? But I suspect that they cannot connect the dots between the racism evident in such an observation and Trump’s trumpeting that suggests his sexual targets were only Caucasians who had a somewhat Germanic look.

    I sincerely hope that no big october surprise is in store for Clinton that will allow Trump to win. It might be OK for a sexual predator to show such proclivities after he enters the white house but It might well be a disaster for such proclivities to be shown before he gets in. Anyhow, he won’t last long there as Impeachment proceedings will start apace if he gets in.


  • Listen Charles Skeete do not get your theories twisted how many times in your life have you made a decision that in retrospect concludes it was the wrong decision. for Trump his problems exceeds those of error but a disposition soely set aside on self-interst and a truimphant regard to be boastful and out of touch with reality


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    AWYT: Some believe that Trump made a chump of the champ. Either you get it or you don’t.
    It is amazing that the same behavior they would condemn Bill C for, they ignore in their man Donald Trump. So it would appear that grabbing by the pokerts is acceptable behavior for some men and offensive behavior for others,

    But this only demonstrates the US is a place where they throw away the key for some rapists (guilty and innocent) and give community service to a next set of rapists.

    What you are seeing is America choking on its hypocrisy


  • Trump has described women as ‘fat pigs”, “slobs”, “disgusting animals” and ‘dogs”, I wonder what the women who turn up at his rallies think about those comments.


  • Wrong Move Trump .attacking the media. You have no sense of reality
    Another reality that have come to lite . Trump hotels in the height of tourism is having to decrease their prices while other hotels are well booked.
    By the time election is over Trump would have dug a hole really deep from which he can never get out


  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @Are-we at 8:43 AM , LOLL re “…not one of the women who have come forward to claim that Trump has interfered with them is a black woman?. Food for thought eh?…”

    Yes it’s food for thought but heh I don’t like Japanese sushi either. Am I racist because of that?

    Did Tiger put his balls into one non-white cup? What about Bill (Cosby, that is) most of his non-compliant drug taking ladies where of a certain hue also.

    Don’t get me wrong, I hear your point loudly but with Trump’s racist core so well described already I would have been completely flabbergasted if he had in fact done the ‘jungle fever’ ting.

    I am now totally conflicted about a Trump victory. Win or lose the US is in for a turbulent four years.

    If he wins his enterprises and ‘brand’ will be decimated. It befuddles my mind that he can 1) expect to ‘blind trust’ his business and 2) not have them bombed by terrorists. This will then draw him into more unhinged behaviour and it will surely result in an ill-advised action that starts a major conflagration. The world is screwed.

    If he loses he will continue with his extremely vexatious rhetoric and it will cause serious civil strife before he is fully investigated and charged for some aspect of sedition/inciting unrest/collusion with a foreign power/increased Russia tension/whatever. And an arrest or any other scenario will cause much greater stress. The world is still screwed.

    Clinton currently has a 90%+ polling average of victory. Better certainly than Obama had at this time of the cycle, YET Trump still seems in with a chance…so fah sure unfortunately some type of further October surprise awaits us.

    @Pieces is doing his ‘stoopid carton’ best to make the Bajan elections at least 50% the tension of these elections and he may yet get it much higher; we are in for another humdinger in a few years.


  • Well Well & Consequences

    “Anyhow, he won’t last long there as Impeachment proceedings will start apace if he gets in.”

    That’s what I keep saying, whichever one, Trump or Killary slithers into the white hiuse, they are both looking at a well deserved early impeachment, so it does not really matter, with Killary, she has a better chance of sliding in because of Bills experience inckuding his impeachment.

    One really nasty scandal a piece and they are both gone…hopefully, to prison.


  • Bushie,
    U went to the DEMonic/ Shill school of OBFUSCATION but U FAILED the course!

    FBI Director clearly stated she had Classified Emails but Sicko Willie cut the deal at the airport runway.

    I know this is too hard for your thick skull just like the course in Obfuscation.

    This email shows U are Brain

    Time to come out of de Bush.


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    After the elections Trump became an author with two best sellers
    How to greet women
    Forget the handshake, grab the pokerts
    Foreword by MB & Lawson
    (I cannot take this shit seriously)

    Liked by 1 person

  • Hillary will never be impeached.

    Feminists will rally to her defence, regardless if her crimes, just as they are voting her in to office now, despite monumental evidence that she is corrupt and bereft of accomplishments

    We will have to hope a Higher Power intervenes to save us from eight long years of grand theft, wars in the Middle East, and mindless feminist indoctrination.


  • @chad99999

    You are a bright person and must now how to use the comparative and superlative. Let us construct an example in the off chance you are not aware.

    Trump has the awfullest smell of the presidential candidates hence Clinton is more electable. Capiche?


  • Well Well & Consequences

    Being convicted of raping a 13 year old would look good on Trumps resume…he wont be able to twist enough words to get outta that one…not with an eyewitness who came forward and joined the case…..

    ……….he can take that to the bank..ruptcy court…lol


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    A next hijack attempt. This time I put the word pokerts in the middle, but i fear someone better than i am needs to get the ball rolling..
    When others more capable than us do nothing, then you and I must do something.

    I have a teenage son who would like to use my resources, but dislike my instructions. in fact, at one stage I had to ask him to return the credit card that I gave to him.

    It is remarkable to see an institution like UWI behaving as if it was a teenager. UWI is where we would find the greatest amount of book sense in the Caribbean and, it appears, the least amount of commonsense.

    Indeed, the very next act of all the Caribbean governments should have been a slow release of funds to this institution. Hit them where they feel it most, in the pokerts or pockets.

    It seems as if Sir Hilary Beckles knows the difference between a BS piece of paper and the actual funding of the institution.


  • The October “surprise” was Clinton’s emails from wiki leaks but Trump’s big mouth wiped out what would have been a GOP advantage. The GOP is embracing Assange which is a far cry from what they were hoping to do with him after the leaks about the military action in Iraq and the diplomatic cables that he released to the USA’s embarrassment.

    Politics make strange bed fellows and I wonder what the Assange, Putin, Trump triumvirate is (was) planning for the rest of us.

    Liked by 1 person

  • Bushtea;

    I hadn’t seen your 8:34 am post when I posted mine at 8:43. So I really need to say that I agree with you totally about the relative lack of importance of the supposed errors of judgement that Hillary made. They pale into absolute insignificance when viewed against Trump’s gargantuan exposure of his absolute unsuitability for the post of POTUS.

    It is really instructive to see what the Republican rumour mill has been able to achieve against Hillary in over 30 years of focused selective rumour mongering against the woman when three well educated Bajan whites (or 2 whites and a black) can swallow hook line and sinker all the positive propaganda about Trump and the negative propaganda about Hillary.

    It now appears that Obama has been warned to be careful by Trump otherwise the Trump Machine will trump up some sexual infelicity charges against him. To be forewarned is normally to be be forearmed, so I hope Obama knows what to do.

    De Ingrunt Word;

    I wonder if you really got the point I was trying to make about Trump’s accusers. It was essentially to point out to Trump’s black supporters and Bajan white supporters that he was so racist that he wouldn’t even consider black women as worthy of being objects that he might interfere with. They did not reach his standards for extreme dalliance.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @Sarge

    Have you heard the fat lady sing?


  • Sarge wrote
    Trump has described women as ‘fat pigs”, “slobs”, “disgusting animals” and ‘dogs”, I wonder what the women who turn up at his rallies think about those comments.

    They agree about Rosie O’Donnel!!!!


  • Are we —-wrote,,I wonder if MoneyBrain and Lawson and Chad55555 have been noting that not one of the women who have come forward to claim that Trump has interfered with them is a black woman?

    Commonsense would dicKtate that Trump intersects with fewer darker ladies besides Omerosa who leaves a bad taste in peoples mout and minds! lol

    They were plenty darker beauties on The Apprentice series, how come he didnt trouble LaToya

    But a brown young man with a black woman as mother, who claims to have been a prostitute, say Sicko Willie wont accept his child! Shill has not asked Maury to do the Test—why she does not want to know?


  • Peoples the truth is that Shill represents the 1%, richass whiteys who are in the Wall St Washington DC CABAL! The Pay for Play Foundation ripped the Haitians and much more she has said negatively about Black people and many here still believe Shill is for them??????????? REALLY?


  • @ Sargeant

    That is precisely the point of any campaign.

    You identify the central player/issues and you focus on them and, while you may from time to time bring up the sensational, like Bill’s indiscretions, you keep to the script.

    He, Trump, is NOT A STRATEGIST, and is ignoring the direction of his advisors BECAUSE HE IS AN IDIOT.

    The key thing was to focus on her (a) ability to make sound decisions (b) the Benghazi f-up and (c) her use of email in the way she did.

    That was all he needed to do (maybe even include some **** of Weiner’s wife)

    Trump was a plant.

    An incredulous plant who was to disrupt the support of the Republicans and leave the camp open to Hilary.

    THEY, NEITHER CLINTON NOR TRUMP, DID NOT CALCULATE ON THE GROUNDSWELL OF SUPPORT that he would have secured and, like the hawk that he is, he decided that he would go for it.

    They could not believe it and what he did was to make them believe that he was going to go al little longer in the breach and then abort.

    They bought it and then had to do all sorts of searches to find this bombshell for what is 11 year old ammunition.

    There are ways to defuse it but we will leave that there because he is an adolescent who is caught up in childish emotional outbursts and as such should not be next to nuclear codes.

    Hilary WILL BE PRESIDENT, Taa taa


  • Piece
    I postulated the Trump was a DEM plant that turned rogue, a long time ago.
    BUT on nuclear codes—- here is Jill Stein, Green Party candidate talking Trump versus Shill??



    Sista tears the botsy off CNN and their disinformation anchor!


  • Very interesting opinions.

    I made a film called The War You Don’t See, in which I interviewed distinguished journalists in America and Britain: reporters such as Dan Rather of CBS, Rageh Omar of the BBC, David Rose of the Observer.

    All of them said that had journalists and broadcasters done their job and questioned the propaganda that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction; had the lies of George W. Bush and Tony Blair not been amplified and echoed by journalists, the 2003 invasion of Iraq might not have happened, and hundreds of thousands of men, women and children would be alive today.

    The propaganda laying the ground for a war against Russia and/or China is no different in principle. To my knowledge, no journalist in the Western “mainstream” – a Dan Rather equivalent, say – asks why China is building airstrips in the South China Sea.

    The answer ought to be glaringly obvious. The United States is encircling China with a network of bases, with ballistic missiles, battle groups, nuclear-armed bombers.

    This lethal arc extends from Australia to the islands of the Pacific, the Marianas and the Marshalls and Guam, to the Philippines, Thailand, Okinawa, Korea and across Eurasia to Afghanistan and India. America has hung a noose around the neck of China. This is not news. Silence by media; war by media.

    In 2015, in high secrecy, the US and Australia staged the biggest single air-sea military exercise in recent history, known as Talisman Sabre. Its aim was to rehearse an Air-Sea Battle Plan, blocking sea lanes, such as the Straits of Malacca and the Lombok Straits, that cut off China’s access to oil, gas and other vital raw materials from the Middle East and Africa.

    In the circus known as the American presidential campaign, Donald Trump is being presented as a lunatic, a fascist. He is certainly odious; but he is also a media hate figure. That alone should arouse our scepticism.

    Trump’s views on migration are grotesque, but no more grotesque than those of David Cameron. It is not Trump who is the Great Deporter from the United States, but the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Barack Obama.

    According to one prodigious liberal commentator, Trump is “unleashing the dark forces of violence” in the United States. Unleashing them?

    This is the country where toddlers shoot their mothers and the police wage a murderous war against black Americans. This is the country that has attacked and sought to overthrow more than 50 governments, many of them democracies, and bombed from Asia to the Middle East, causing the deaths and dispossession of millions of people.

    No country can equal this systemic record of violence. Most of America’s wars (almost all of them against defenceless countries) have been launched not by Republican presidents but by liberal Democrats: Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, Obama.

    In 1947, a series of National Security Council directives described the paramount aim of American foreign policy as “a world substantially made over in [America’s] own image”. The ideology was messianic Americanism. We were all Americans. Or else. Heretics would be converted, subverted, bribed, smeared or crushed.

    Donald Trump is a symptom of this, but he is also a maverick. He says the invasion of Iraq was a crime; he doesn’t want to go to war with Russia and China. The danger to the rest of us is not Trump, but Hillary Clinton. She is no maverick. She embodies the resilience and violence of a system whose vaunted “exceptionalism” is totalitarian with an occasional liberal face.

    As presidential election day draws near, Clinton will be hailed as the first female president, regardless of her crimes and lies – just as Barack Obama was lauded as the first black president and liberals swallowed his nonsense about “hope”. And the drool goes on.

    Described by the Guardian columnist Owen Jones as “funny, charming, with a coolness that eludes practically every other politician”, Obama the other day sent drones to slaughter 150 people in Somalia. He kills people usually on Tuesdays, according to the New York Times, when he is handed a list of candidates for death by drone. So cool.

    In the 2008 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton threatened to “totally obliterate” Iran with nuclear weapons. As Secretary of State, she participated in the overthrow of the democratic government of Honduras. Her contribution to the destruction of Libya in 2011 was almost gleeful. When the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi, was publicly sodomised with a knife – a murder made possible by American logistics – Clinton gloated over his death: “We came, we saw, he died.”

    One of Clinton’s closest allies is Madeleine Albright, the former Secretary of State, who has attacked young women for not supporting “Hillary”. This is the same Madeleine Albright who infamously celebrated on TV the death of half a million Iraqi children as “worth it”.

    Among Clinton’s biggest backers are the Israel lobby and the arms companies that fuel the violence in the Middle East. She and her husband have received a fortune from Wall Street. And yet, she is about to be ordained the women’s candidate, to see off the evil Trump, the official demon. Her supporters include distinguished feminists: the likes of Gloria Steinem in the US and Anne Summers in Australia.

    A generation ago, a post-modern cult now known as “identity politics” stopped many intelligent, liberal-minded people examining the causes and individuals they supported – such as the fakery of Obama and Clinton; such as bogus progressive movements like Syriza in Greece, which betrayed the people of that country and allied with their enemies.

    Self-absorption, a kind of “me-ism”, became the new zeitgeist in privileged western societies and signalled the demise of great collective movements against war, social injustice, inequality, racism and sexism.

    Today, the long sleep may be over. The young are stirring again. Gradually. The thousands in Britain who supported Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader are part of this awakening – as are those who rallied to support Senator Bernie Sanders.


  • Margaret Thatcher and Anthony Gilberthorpe in 2003.

    The British man being put forward by Donald Trump’s campaign team as a witness to his innocence in a sexual assault allegation has a record of involvement in political scandal and unproved allegations, financial mismanagement and taking money from a newspaper to expose a Tory MP’s sex scandal.

    Anthony Gilberthorpe, a 54-year-old former Tory activist, antiques dealer and Big Issue seller from Gloucestershire, claims his “photographic memory” enabled him to recognise Jessica Leeds when he saw her last week on a US news report talking about how Trump had assaulted her on a flight between Dallas and New York in 1979.


  • @MB
    They agree about Rosie O’Donnel!!!!
    Could you point out the physical differences between the majority of Trump’s female supporters and Rosie O’Donnell?


  • MoneyBrain, Lawson, Chad45

    Check out David’s post of 3:43 pm. Wunnah see the track record of the man that Donald Trump and his team are using to provide an alibi for Trump in the Airline assault case. In accepting the alibi the Trump (aka the Chump) Team seems to have admitted that the complainer actually sat on a seat next to Trump. What idiots. Pence is even more hopeless than he is clueless and balls-less to have apparently agreed to that idiotic ploy.

    Its called shooting yourself in the foot. They are clueless and it is very interesting that at least one old HC boy will defend the defenceless, irregardless!


  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @Pieces, this schism about Trump being a plant is a wonderful ‘Manchurian’ candidate type story line. It has the wealthy, handsome leading man, the beautiful people, the sex, the intrigue and even death and last minute plot twist. It is a sure best seller. But it is fiction!

    As a very smart man would you select an ultra competitive, alpha male egomaniac to be your fall-guy in the arrangement as you postulate? I think not. A man who had already made various forays at the Presidency…one sorta serious. If LeCarre or Ludlam or Childs had offered that as their key plot thesis I would read the book but be disappointed re the bad strategy of the Hillary character.

    You do not test Hannibal Lecter to a game of wiles and you certainly don’t look an alpha dog directly in the eyes and call his bluff. We can condemn Trump as a molester and uncouth cretin but he is a supreme alpha-dog.

    He is too confident and assured to be tested in the way you suggest…because he would never have released that prize once he got it between his teeth.

    This man is not one with whom to play the games you suggest so although I accept that he is the ONLY republican candidate that Clinton could have defeated I offer that the plant theory is more an excellent yarn than plausible reality.

    Consider that Donald Trump is so conniving that he would rhetorical release the ultimate insider talk that Clinton wanted to bribe him to become the candidate because she thought he would be a push over and work that perfectly into his narrative of her corruption and the massive conspiracy. He would be home and dry!

    No Pieces, Trump is not the man with whom you play those games; he would eat her alive…and no salacious pun intended. But I am waiting for the final book though, it will be awesome.


  • Sarge,

    You dont get to position my response. Rosie is just as Trump says—-proof he is 100% correct occasionally.

    Michelle above, check it.

    How about Michelle on Shill in 2008 and now sweet political hypocricy.


  • Moneybrain;

    Your 2:43 pm post was one with very interesting and possibly true points. It sounds like one of those intellectually stimulating posts from Pachamama. What is the source URL?


  • Money Brain;

    An awesome video in your 4:25 pm post.

    That lady should have been running for president on the Republican ticket instead of Trump. She is the best interpreter of the Donald’s message that I have heard so far.

    What a Pity!


  • Wjhat is Donald’s message?




  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @MB, what exactly are you projecting re that Observer paste at 4:31 PM?

    I am unclear whether the author supports Trump or not but for surely Mr Trump is no more a candidate against “war, social injustice, inequality, racism and sexism” than Mrs Clinton is an egregious proponent for them!

    What is offered in many area was gleaned throughout this campaign. The most crucial point is one David made on another blog which essentially heralded the absolute hypocrisy of life and politics.

    Several facts are absolutely interesting and if one reads carefully you can see Trump in the echo chamber of the facts loudly presented here.

    Mr Trump HIMSELF has said that Obama has deported more illegals in his tenure than previous presidents. Of course that is said sotto voce. Writ large he amplifies that Obama and Clinton want open borders. His wall process is a nonsense that will achieve no more than the current stringent polices with upgrades is not already doing. His is the same BS hypocrisy of which the author speaks.

    Trump’s remarks about no wars is pure blarney. His comments about Japan and other getting nukes is double bluff BS. That is simply to fuel negotiations and agitate the world. He will likely engage in more wars if he wins than Clinton ever would. The author cites Clinton’s 2008 was remarks, Trump has made the very same type comment re ISIS. And i i he wins they WILL engage his properties and he will bomb their backsides. Again pure political hypocrisy.

    The point about”… bogus progressive movements like Syriza in Greece” is extremely interesting. To short on a blog to get into that properly but why is Syriza bogus? Because its leader, after playing ‘call my bluff with Putin’ realized that in order to save his country he had to concede on some key metrics!

    What exactly were you driving to senor with this reference?


  • David;

    Look at the video again.

    The Lady comes across to me as someone who has taken what should have been the core theme of the points that a serious Republican candidate should have been trumpeting but ones which Trump has glossed over, with a coherent presentation that tries to explain, inter alia, the apparent lack of progress for Blacks over the past several years in terms of a debatable failure of Obama to fulfill his promises. I think that Obama has actually done as much as and indeed more than could have been reasonablyexpected given the well telegraphed intransigence of the Republicans and their determination to ensure that history records him and his policies as failures. That debate has not been rationally or satisfactorily engaged so far but she succeeded in outlining the tenets of what the discussion would have been had Trump been anything but a charlatan.

    Those are the issues that the campaign should have been fought over and the Lady puts over her points well. Trump was incapable of pushing those points believably and always ensured that they were hidden by his emphasizing extraneous matters.

    Look at the video again!


  • David;

    I forgot to mention above that I did not hear her try to claim that Trump would make America Great Again. She skirted that eminently racist construct.


  • Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…Hilarious, funnier than the “binders full of women” by the other clown Romney.

    The fraudulent lie that is the Trump campaign being finally exposed.

    Chad and MoneyB, yall backing the loser all the way.


  • @MB
    You dont get to position my response.
    I expected that response, the same thing that Trump said about Rosie he would have said about any of his female supporters but he loves the “Poorly educated”, they don’t know the difference.


  • @AWTY

    Should the candidate not be the one to trumpet in.a coherent manner the policies of his platform?


  • de pedantic Dribbler

    Thus far the details from the Wikileaks related to the Wall St speeches have been quite underwhelming. There must be a large shoe yet to drop otherwise the Clinton team missed a trick here. They could have baited Trump that they would release the speeches if he released his taxes,

    The details from the speeches show political duplicity but nothing so egregious that is overly embarrassing or earth shattering. She is already seen as high wire shifty actor so nothing changes here.

    She admitted she failed with Russian overtures or example with “Clinton added that Putin has rejected some of their attempts to work together “out of hand,” even as she displayed high class hypocrisy re the passage of the bill to rein in Wall St abuses.

    This overall email dump is an awesome political class for all students of this game.

    Great stuff.


  • This Election further reveals the hypocrisy that is the Evangelical Christian movement, the leadership of the various groups are twisting themselves into pretzels supporting Trump. People like Franklyn Graham, Tony Perkins, Ralph Reed, Jerry Falwell jr. and Robert Jeffress who in the past said “character matters” and are for traditional – read- family values have abandoned those principles with a candidate Trump. They all have some things in common, White, conservative, male and Christian, they are never heard on the social issues of the day except for vocal rants against abortion. They are silent about the plight of the poor, minimum wage and police violence against minorities, people in those camps are not members of their constituency.

    If an Obama had done and said the same things as Trump they would be heating up the airwaves about the moral decay in America and he would be vying to be in charge of the outhouse, but Trump is still revered in the eyes of these phonies who claim to be ‘men of God’, they are politicians posing as preachers.


  • Well Well & Consequences

    Lol hahaha lol.this will just kill Chad…lol

    “The Internet Is Practically Begging Michelle Obama To Run For President
    by Eric Pfeiffer
    Share 47651 October 14, 2016 at 12:30

    Flickr (Gage Skidmore)
    FLOTUS for POTUS take two?

    First Lady Michelle Obama delivered what some are calling the most important speech of the 2016 presidential election, in which she declared, “I can’t believe I am saying that a candidate for president of the United States has actually bragged about sexually assaulting women,” she told a crowd. “This is not normal. This is not politics as usual. This is disgraceful. This is intolerable.”

    Like virtually all other first spouses before her, Obama remains much more popular than her husband in the polls.

    But with Hillary Clinton paving the way, could Michelle Obama’s powerful advocacy translate into elective office, even the presidency itself? She’s been adamant that she won’t seek political office, or even work in politics, once her husband leaves office next January. Nonetheless, people are talking …. No, practically begging her to run for the presidency. After her speech at the Democratic National Convention this summer, some writers officially made the call, as Brent Budowsky wrote: “I will predict that the odds are even money or better that Michelle Obama will ultimately be drafted to run for the Senate and will run and be elected.” He says that would then set the stage for her to run for the top office a few years later. But a growing contingent of fans online don’t have time to wait for all that:

    What do you think? Barring some tragic event, Hillary Clinton will presumably win this year’s election and run for re-election in 2020. That gives Michelle Obama several years to re-think her opposition to running.

    And if that happens, 2024 could be yet another historic election following the first black president and the first black female president.”


  • Michelle made this very Political speech too and we know she does not really believe this:

    “It’s not locker room talk. I don’t know men who talk that way. Decent men do not talk that way. What Trump was talking about was sexual assault,” Michelle Obama said during a visit to New Hampshire.
    “Men brag, and she is telling people that she doesn’t know men who brag. You know the people that have been to the White House?” Ralph said. (WARNING: Some of the language here and later in the story may be offensive to some readers.)
    “How about some of the rappers that talk about their b****** and their hos have performed such lyrics in the White House? But she doesn’t know men who talk and sing about sexual assault. It’s all over hip-hop lyrics and has been for a while!
    “So is assault on the police a feature of some hip-hop lyrics, and it’s been performed at the White House. But she doesn’t know men who talk that way. She doesn’t know decent guys who talk that way.”
    A “sermon” by the Obamas’ former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
    “Yeah, I guess Michelle Obama wasn’t there when the Rev. Wright was talking about Bill Clinton,” Ralph said “You remember what Rev. Wright said about Bill Clinton, Monica Lewinsky? … ‘And Bill and Monica Lewinsky was riding dirty. Yeah, chickens have come home to roost, baby.’ ‘Bill was riding dirty,’ and the population, the congregation went nuts.”
    Let’s not forget Michelle’s BFF, Beyoncé. Here are some of her lyrical exploits (WARNING AGAIN: graphic language):
    “Can you lick my Skittles, it’s the sweetest in the middle / Pink is the flavor, solve the riddle”
    “I can’t wait till I get home so you can turn that cherry out / I want you to turn that cherry out, turn that cherry out”
    “First both of my legs go back on your head, and whatever you want, yeah baby, I’m bad”
    “Now my mascara running, red lipstick smudged / Yeah, he’s so h**** he wants to f*** / He popped all my buttons and he ripped my blouse/ He Monica Lewinsky-ed all on my gown / Oh daddy, daddy, he didn’t bring the towel / Oh baby, baby, we better slow it down”
    “Over there I swear I saw them cameras flash / Hand prints and footprints on my glass / Hand prints and good grips on my a**”
    “Gimme that daddy long stroke”
    The first lady, meanwhile, calls her a role model.


  • “How Guyana is trying to combat its high suicide rate”


  • ” How Britain’s young Muslims are tapping into a £2 trillion market

    From mint mojitos in Birmingham to scented oils in London, Generation M’s entrepreneurs are catering for an affluent group ignored by the big brands”


  • “ac October 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM #

    Listen Charles Skeete do not get your theories twisted how many times in your life have you made a decision that in retrospect concludes it was the wrong decision. for Trump his problems exceeds those of error but a disposition soely set aside on self-interst and a truimphant regard to be boastful and out of touch with reality”

    Your conclusion smacks of out right bias to me. How can you so conclude that Mr Trump did not make an error but are guided by a disposition solely set aside on self-interest and a triumphant regard to be boastful and out of touch with reality. Are you a psychoanalyst?
    I didn’t support those women who waited after all those years to level charges true or untrue at President Clinton and I do not support those who have waited all those years to level theses charges true or untrue at Mr Trump so my criticism of Mr Clinton was not fuelled by something done in retrospect but by his conduct in the white house with the young intern after placing his hand on the bible at that all important swearing ceremony and swearing to defend and uphold the constitution of the USA and then to lie for a whole year and disparage the already tarnished character of the young intern which I deem to be abuse of his power and contempt for the public. Nothing done by Mr trump can be worse than Mr Clinton’s behaviour as President and I think that those like you who supported Mr Clinton in his sexual aberrations have no moral right to denigrate Mr Trump.


  • @Charles Skeete
    Nothing done by Mr trump can be worse than Mr Clinton’s behaviour as President and I think that those like you who supported Mr Clinton in his sexual aberrations have no moral right to denigrate Mr Trump.
    Stop twisting the facts, the young intern didn’t accuse Clinton of anything and he didn’t disparage her character. Monica Lewinsky confided in Linda Tripp and that started the ball rolling, Lewinsky didn’t want any part of it but was compelled to testify under penalty of law. The women coming forward are directly accusing Trump of sexual assault and Trump’s own words have convicted him, incidentally this is not the first time that a woman has come forward years after the fact to allege sexual impropriety by a man. Remember Anita Hill?

    I admire your tenacity,the Party of Lincoln has a die- hard supporter on the rock


  • Sargeant

    is just another stool pigeon in a gender war.
    With help from corrupt media organizations, Hillary is using fabricated accusations of sexual assault to smother and suppress the news from the Trump camp about her own corrupt deal making and Janus-like politics

    I have no idea why any grown man qould want to put an undistinguished, physically unattractive, foul-mouthed misandrist in the Oval Office. It is a case of male chivalry gone beserk.


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    Here is my silly contribution to the pokerts discussion.

    Since Trump was operating over the same time span as the Bill Cs, he will have Cosby numbers.

    Nine grabs so far, but I am estimating we will end up having over 30 pokerts grabbed by the Donald.

    9 and counting


  • Trump has a choice, to be taken out or defend against the women streaming out of the woodwork. It is the way it is when you run against the establishment candidate.

    On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:



  • If Trump likes to peep at young girls naked why doesn’t the old dog go to a strip club like everybody else, (he could start up one in BBD if there isn’t one already).

    You’re young and beautiful
    but you are on duty night duty
    dub beauty

    Only extremists are defending the old dog.


  • But David

    We think you are wrong

    This is not merely a matter of establishment candidate vs outsider. For Trump is as establishment as they come. And Clinton is highly flawed as well.

    It represents a deeper/wider moral crisis at the centre of the American political-economy model, festering from the beginning.

    Bernie Sanders was an outsider but he had no known such baggage.

    But that Trump was able to defeat 17 other Republicans and that Clinton against a relatively normal candidate in a normal year and given her baggage under scrutiny the shoe could very easily have been on the other foot and should have been.


  • @Pacha

    Bernie is not a Republican.


  • But that both Trump and Clinton emerged at the same time makes the existential crisis within the system that it now is.


  • Please David!

    There are no Republican, no Democrats

    Only haves and have-nots

    Trump was a Democrat, until recently.

    And Clinton was a Republican in the 60’s


  • As of Friday afternoon, WikiLeaks has released a total of 10,169 emails from the hacked account of John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman.

    Some of the top stories include:

    1) Hillary’a campaign team held back emails between Hillary and Obama after gov’t subpoena: Clinton Campaign Chairman, John Podesta, wrote and email to Cheryll Mills (attorney) about holding back the emails between President Obama and Hillary Clinton after receiving a subpoena to reveal all.

    2) Hillary breaks FEC rules by meeting with Super PAC: A hacked email released by WikiLeaks exposes that Clinton’s team was in a panic over a pending story the NY Times was about to break, revealing Clinton had illegally attended meetings with the Priorities USA super PAC,.”

    According to FEC regulations, SuperPACS are supposed to be completely independent of a campaign. “These expenditures may not be made in concert or cooperation with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate, the candidate’s campaign or a political party,” states the regulations.

    3) Hillary hates “everyday Americans.” John Podesta sent an email on April 19, 2015, stating, “I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans” but I think you should use it once the first time she says I’m running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.”

    4) Clinton’s dream is OPEN BORDERS: A quote from a speech Hillary Clinton gave to a Brazilian bank on May 16, 2013 revealed she wants open borders. She stated: “My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.” [05162013 Remarks to Banco Itau.doc, p. 28]

    5) Clinton admits USA can’t possibly vet all refugees: Speaking in Chicago to the Jewish United Fund on October 2013, Clinton said: “And particularly with Syria which has everyone quite worried, Jordan because it’s on their border and they have hundreds of thousands of refugees and they can’t possibly vet all those refugees so they don’t know if, you know, jihadists are coming in along with legitimate refugees.”

    6) Clinton Admits to Having Two Sets Of Policies: In a speech to the National Multi-Housing Council on April 24, 2013, Clinton said, “But if everybody’s watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position.” She reportedly earned $225,000 for the speech.

    7) Funding ISIS: Hillary Clinton wrote an email to John Podesta on August 17, 2014, acknowledging that the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia are funding ISIS.

    “While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” she wrote.

    Meanwhile, those same governments have funded both the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign, with between $10 to $25 million going to the Foundation as of 2008, the Saudis bragged they had funded 20% of Clinton’s presidential campaign.

    A Qatar ambassador asked to meet with Bill Clinton “for five minutes” to present him a $1 million check “for his birthday.”

    8) Clinton & Obama Tricked Americans On Iran Deal: Leaked emails that including “talking points” on the Iran nuclear agreement in the summer of 2015, where they were trying to sell Americans on the deal was discovered to contain misleading information.

    9) “We are screwed!” over conflicts with Clinton Foundation: Bill Clinton’s advisor, Doug Band, sent an email to John Podesta and Cheryl Mills in November 2011 about the negative publicity surrounding the connections with his firm Teneo and the Clinton Foundation, and said, “I’m starting to worry that if this story gets out, we are screwed.” Band said Chelsea Clinton was “acting like a spoiled brat kid who has nothing else to do but create issues to justify what she’s doing.”

    10) Bill & Chelsea nearly drove Foundation executive to suicide: In another email exchange in December 2011, Doug Band told how he had managed to prevent Clinton Foundation COO Laura Graham from committing suicide, over work-related stress caused by Bill Clinton and Chelsea Clinton.

    11) Drivers Licenses To Illegal Aliens: Email exchanges between Clinton staff verify that Clinton wants to give drivers licenses to all “undocumented immigrants.”

    12) Pay To Play Exposed: Evidence was leaked suggesting that during the term Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, the Obama administration rewarded individuals who gave large donations to either the DNC or Obama’s “Organizing for Action” organization with ambassadorship positions. An email dated May 18, 2016 asked the DNC if they could set up a brief call “to go over our process for handling donations from donors who have given us pay to play letters.”

    13) Fake Trump Craigslist Ad Scheme: Already plotting how they could take Trump down with the “woman card”, the DNC discussed how they could place a FAKE Craigslist ad, making it appear that Trump was advertising for “hot” women.

    14) Clinton went anti-Muslim: In 2008, Hillary used race-driven talking points to discredit Obama in the general election. The campaign pushed the narrative that Obama was no good for America because his father was Muslim, and that he grew up around Muslims in a nation highly populated with Muslims.

    15) Donors expect special favors: One email offers an independent “governance review” by a law firm that specializes in nonprofits. The review was requested by Mrs. Clinton’s daughter Chelsea who had concerns about the Clinton Foundation and potential conflict-of-interests with its donors, and was sharply opposed by her father’s friends and donors. The review, conducted in December 2010, concluded many of the foundation’s donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”

    16) Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman urged her to lie to the public on whether she sent classified information: Bloomberg News reported Mrs. Clinton’s campaign spokesman Brian Fallon urged her to issue a blanket denial that she ever sent classified information through her private email server because anything less could open her up to charges she broke the law. “We should not think it is fine to find something that ‘should have been classified at the time,’ ” Mr. Fallon, the spokesman, wrote to other top campaign officials on Aug. 22, 2015, as they debated a statement Mrs. Clinton would make on her use of an email server in her home. “Our position is that no such material exists, else it could be said she mishandled classified info,” Mr. Fallon wrote.

    What a sweeeet bunch, nuh?


  • Money Brain;

    Dah is all?


  • @MB

    If only the grab the po**y did not break as well.



    Liked by 1 person

  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    seem like a drawn out list… some of it is nonsensical
    17 points with probably 10 or more of BS
    review and repost the non BS portion 🙂
    Not going to happen…

    Liked by 1 person

  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    Wondering if the number of points will be less than the number of pokerts 🙂
    Unable to take your guy pgrabber seriously….

    Liked by 1 person

  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    I apologize to my fellow citizens. I held a low opinion of you because of your fcus on grabbing the pokerts. i have seen the errors of my ways. This story grabs my………. attention.


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    Juvenile, but I am starting to love it 🙂
    You can tell a lot by a man’s name
    T – tax evader
    R – republican
    U – uncensored fool
    M – misogynist
    P – pokerts grabber

    Blogmaster, I need help. Please ban me from this post…

    Liked by 1 person

  • @TheGazer

    Hilary Clinton approves your message.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @Chad
    How can a grown man support the New York con artist who wears his lack of knowledge on any subject like a badge of honour; who embraces racists like David Duke and uses racist rhetoric to further his ambition; who alleges the possibility of fraud in the primaries when it appeared that events were going against him and now alleges the same when he is floundering in the polls; who threatens to jail his opponents like a General Tinpot if he wins the Election and who is urging his followers to revolt when he loses; who admires Putin and will assume the role of the KGB Colonel’s lap dog if he wins; who stiffs the small businessmen trying to earn a living by reneging on his debts; who doesn’t pay taxes but excoriates those who do; who assaults women because he can and who ogles teenage girls because as in his own words “I sorta get away with that”….. you get the drift?

    If only I could obtain an “Obama 2016” bumper sticker to annoy your Chadian ass.


  • The last sentence was not intended to insult genuine people from Chad, I should have written “to annoy the Ayn Rand wannabe disciple who uses the name Chad9…..”


  • Well Well & Consequences

    This dude sounds just like Chad..whine, whine, whine.

    Let’s do the Trump whine…whine..whine

    Let’s do the Chad whine, whine, whine



  • “Stop twisting the facts, the young intern didn’t accuse Clinton of anything and he didn’t disparage her character. Monica Lewinsky confided in Linda Tripp and that started the ball rolling, Lewinsky didn’t want any part of it but was compelled to testify under penalty of law. The women coming forward are directly accusing Trump of sexual assault and Trump’s own words have convicted him, incidentally this is not the first time that a woman has come forward years after the fact to allege sexual impropriety by a man. Remember Anita Hill?

    I admire your tenacity,the Party of Lincoln has a die- hard supporter on the rock”

    It is you Mr Sarge who is twisting the facts. Mr Clinton after a year of putting the country whose constitution he swore to uphold through turmoil and great expense admitted to inappropriate sexual behaviour with ‘that woman’ in the White house at that and his sordid behaviour was supported by his wife until evidence refuted her claim that a ‘vast right wing conspiracy’ was behind a plot to tarnish his image.

    Anita Hill was a Democratic plant to deny the republican black nominee the appointment to the supreme court. She should be ashamed of herself.

    Yes I admire your tenacity as well for your unbridled support of the party of Jim crow laws, the Ku Klux klan and slavery and the majority of which did not support the civil rights bill of 1964 not 1844 but 1964.


  • Anonymouse - TheGazer

    There were a number of Republicans who went after Clinton like a cat chasing its tail. As time passed, it became clear that some of these same Republicans were engaged in activities that were similar to what they were criticizing Bill C for. Not learning any lessons from history, we have Donald Trump now caught up in a list of similar sordid stories after he went after Bill Clinton.

    I can cite cases of preachers delivering sermons against homosexuality and at the same time partaking of this forbidden fruit.

    As some of you point fingers at Bill C, I hope the fingers pointing back at you are all clean.


  • Dont ban Mousey we enjoying laughing at his Goebbels routine Mr Disinformation, only kidding you are not close to being really as good as Dribs!


  • Mousey you dont understand the difference between Evasion and Avoidance——10yrs in Prison.

    Names Mousey like—-ShilLIARy Rotten KILLaTON


  • MB





  • Trump like more blonde women than Adolf!


  • Having spent more than 25 years living in Amerikkkan cities governed by Democrats, I can attest to the disconnect between the soothing speeches of national Democrat candidates like Hillary when they are on TV soliciting votes, and the brutal realities of everyday life on the ground, which is all about abusive police officers , dreadful schools, and “welfare” programs that mostly ignore the poor because nearly all the money is allocated to the salaries of ineffective intermediaries (lawyers, social workers, community organizers and such).

    Hillary did nothing for the black New Yorkers she represented in the US Senate. She is a white suburban racist from the 1960s
    who only joined the Democrat party to promote feminism and wage war on men.

    She is not interested in half the US population. She has no domestic policy agenda for the United States except to promote immiserating trade and immigration policies on behalf of elite banking interests, Hispanics and Muslims. She offers NOTHING to black men except incarceration for trivial offences.

    So we can forgive misguided black feminists who want to see a woman as Commander-in-Chief. But any authentic black man supporting Hillary is a total moron.


  • GP

    I trying my best to unnerstan dat.

    She receive $mns for her Memoirs? How dat wuk?

    GP is Syph, neurological disease or what that got she ?









  • Well Well & Consequences

    Bottomline is Killary is no damn good, there is no getting around, under or above that…but Trump, Trump…I dont think so…I could sympathize with people who are stuck in this recurring US nightmare of 2 of the worst candidates the country has ever had to offer, I can thoroughly understand why a space station is to be built and citizenship is being offered to the 200,000 or so of the brightest people to live and work there, it’s such a pity they don’t take that amount or a few million more of the Trumps and Killarys and exile them to that upcoming space station…never to return to earth among real people..It’s a travesty that anynif them are on earth.

    It sounds like pie in the sky but I wish they would take all their war mongers and slave masters around the world to this space station and leave them there.


  • Hillary hasn’t slept with her husband, or any man, in decades. Has been very selective about her muff-diving (Huma is a Pakistani Muslim who rarely let her husband through the front door).

    Has had the best New York physicians for many years. So why would anyone speculate about advanced syphilis?





  • Until recently in the United States, physicians, particularly those who serve the elites, routinely prescribed precautionary doses of powerful antibiotics every year. I would be surprised if Hillary escaped this.practice

    For example, my own University of Chicago physician used to dose me with a full course of Azithromycin after every annual check up, even though my blood and urine tests were perfectly clean.

    I cannot imagine Hillary having a case of untreated syphilis given the sheer number of New York doctors that have fussed over her for years.


  • RE For example, my own University of Chicago physician used to dose me with a full course of Azithromycin after every annual check up, even though my blood and urine tests were perfectly clean.




  • Well Well & Consequences

    The fraud is being exposed.


  • GP

    Everybody now knows it is bad medicine. That is why I said “Until recently…”
    The physicians who engaged in this practice were making sure their clients were happy and temporarily taken care of. It was a short term strategy.
    The point is it was, and still is, commonplace among the elites. I believe it justifies considerable scepticism about your syphilis theory.




  • Got another lanker for you to trump Mr Sarge

    Following the Presidential show like you from a distance I am not anti- Hilary because of her husband’s indiscretions but because of her penchant for double dealing as the wikileaks tapes clearly reveals and I do not believe she has any moral right to vilify Trump for his inappropriate behaviour to women since she was in the forefront of denigrating the women whom her husband abused and like Mr Trump use his power to take advantage of. You have to admit that your client though promised the prize long ago has not stepped up to the plate and is as unworthy of Mr Trump to hold office. In my view Mrs Obama in her discourses has proven to be a woman of deep intellect and would be a more fitting candidate than Mrs Clinton morally and intellectually. The truth is that Mrs Clinton has no message other than her unbridled ambition to be President and her penchant to change her tune to the position that fits her agenda. In the public forum she supports the Iran deal behind his back she calls it the worst thing since chamberlain handed over Czechoslovakia to Hitler. Nasty two faced woman she is.


  • “de pedantic Dribbler October 15, 2016 at 4:27 PM #

    @Pieces, this schism about Trump being a plant is a wonderful ‘Manchurian’ candidate type story line. It has the wealthy, handsome leading man, the beautiful people, the sex, the intrigue and even death and last minute plot twist. It is a sure best seller. But it is fiction”

    True the plant stuff might be fictional but what is coming through to me is that the press possibly in the pockets of the Democratic party establishment used Trump to disparage and discredit his Republican opponents to remove any credible opposition to a still unpopular Hilary while having the dirt on Trump all the time. Now without any credible threat from the Republican side it is ironic that thirty four days before the election all the dirt on Mr Trump which effectively ruins his campaign has been unleashed with a compliant CNN and MSNBC press serving as the attack dogs for the Clintons and the Democratic party.

    Liked by 1 person

  • @ Charles Skeete.

    Your construct regarding Donald Chump is certainly much sounder than mine.

    It however requires a conglomerate of chess players who are superlative at The Art of War and can see chess moves 20 plays ahead.

    It would have meant that they had that Bush tape at the onset AND that is incredible since Americans CANNOT KEEP SECRETS THAT LONG WITHOUT SUCCUMBING TO THE DESIRE TO GET A MOVIE DEAL for the exposee.

    Notwithstanding, dem is velly nasty peeple so all de ole man can say is that Publishing House is going with your plot……


  • de pedantic Dribbler

    @Skeete you blog generally rather objectively so it’s fair to approach any riposte to you as objectively. re your 5:37 let’s accept that Clinton is duplicitous craven and preternaturally ambitious towards the Presidency. She is.

    But pick any US President in the last 50 years and affirm which one did NOT have those same characteristics. Pick any Bajan PM and cite me one who failed that test.

    This is politics. It is an absolute nonsense to criticize a politician as duplicitous. It is doubly so in this campaign. How does one objectively respond to Trump presenting several Clinton accusers as valid and worthy but in the same breath condemn all those who accuse him and their supporters. That is duplicity bar none.

    How can a reasonable person not accept that anyone who is involved with an organization that raises over $100M for charity but distributes only $5M in direct grants while spending multi more $$millons in salaries and services is basically crooked.

    But do we elect that person or the one who is lighting political Molotov cocktails across the country with incendiary remarks about rigged elections and creating a strange relationship with Russia who is hacking its way into his country’s most treasured traditions of electoral openness; and just waiting for the explosion so that he can blame his opponent.

    Of course the media is after Trump. But that is HIS fault. How can a realistic media be for the candidate who says he will open up the libel laws to go after them or who openly calls journalists crooked and incites his supporters to attack them?? The same man who praises Putin who had journalists killed.

    Does it not make sense for journos to bury this guy?

    In 2008 the media was arguably FOR Obama but they were NOT rabidly against McCain. But for sure this time they are against a man who would be dictator.

    I don’t see any abiding love for ‘crooked’ Hilary despite the ‘first female’ coming after the ‘first Black’. None of that unbridled euphoria whatever!

    It seems madness to me re a concerted media plan. I have not seen too many journalists advance their careers by holding back on news worthy tidbits…just ask the folks at ‘Access Holiday’ and the journo at The Washington Post how that ‘collusion’ worked for them individually.

    Donald Trump is just not suitable. As the Blogmaster said he is the ‘awfullest’ of the two.


  • When voters say Trump is not suitable, they are saying it is necessary for a president to be relentlessly deceitful, and to promote the trade and immigration agenda of the globalists and internationalists in the foreign policy Establishment.

    That is bull—-. We need straightforward plain speaking nationalists in the Oval Office who will prevent the United States from being overrun by impoverished Mexicans and sabotaged by Islamic militants.


  • Chad wrote

    promote the trade and immigration agenda of the globalists and internationalists in the foreign policy Establishment.

    That is bull—-. We need straightforward plain speaking nationalists in the Oval Office who will prevent the United States from being overrun by impoverished Mexicans and sabotaged by Islamic militants.

    But AfroAms benefit from that, dont they?

    Bring in another 25 mn Mex/ Latins, few millions from Rad backgrounds and presto we have a proper mix? hahaha


  • @Money Brain October 16, 2016 at 9:56 AM “A Qatar ambassador asked to meet with Bill Clinton “for five minutes” to present him a $1 million check “for his birthday.”

    Since I know that you move i moneyed circles, can you please introduce me to the Qatari ambassador?


  • @chad99999 October 16, 2016 at 3:42 PM “For example, my own University of Chicago physician used to dose me with a full course of Azithromycin after every annual check up, even though my blood and urine tests were perfectly clean.”

    If this is true then your doctor was medically abusing you. You should sue him, and report this abuse to his professional body.

    I haven’t been prescribed antibiotics since March of 1982.

    But then my physicians are the very best that the University of the West Indies has to offer…not that quack you claim was educated at the University of Chicago.


  • Qatari Ambassador???????

    U want to be 4th wife and if you get raped it would be your fault and dem stone U to death????????

    I could introduce you but how do I live with myself after you meet with probs?? lol


  • Simple

    I would never trust my life to physicians or surgeons at UWI unless there were no alternatives. American doctors use a lot of antibiotics, do a lot of lab tests, and are often very aggressive in treating conditions like hypertension. That is all good in my book, although I recognize there are long term risks from the overuse of antibiotics.

    British- and UWI-trained doctors shortened the lives of my father, my mother and one of my aunts. Before they killed my father they blinded him in one eye with botched cataract surgery. I have nothing good to say about doctors in the Caribbean. All talk, no performance.


Join in the discussion, you never know how expressing your view may make a difference.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s