Submitted by William Skinner
Right Excellent Errol Walton Barrow labelled the Civil Service an army of occupation.
Right Excellent Errol Walton Barrow labelled the Civil Service an army of occupation.

The late prime Minister, Mr. Errol Barrow, singlehandedly turned the public against our public servants by declaring them “an army of occupation”. Barrow was known for literally inflicting fear in those public servants, who refused to bend to his crude form of professional and political bullying.

We are a strange country that expects to plant okra and reap peppers, even if we live outside of the Scotland district! As we developed, the need for a well educated and vibrant public service became vital to our development. Any serious objective analysis of our public service will reveal that it is perhaps, along with the growth of the trade union movement, the pillar on which modern Barbados was built.

While some may correctly point to the often ignored reports of the Auditor General, we cannot ignore that the lack of information forwarded to his office and the several negatives that he points out annually, are the result of widespread political actions and not any proven corruption, on the part of civil servants. We are quite aware that no civil servant “pushing paper” can seriously take on the political sharks known as government ministers, who have their party operatives well placed to ensure that the results they want are achieved.

It should also be obvious that by failing to reform the public sector, the political managerial class has created a service that can no longer effectively and efficiently serve the public. Hence when John or Ann Public goes to get his or her driving license renewed, they are incensed that they have to wait a couple of hours and then told to “come back” tomorrow. John Public fails to understand that the civil servants are working under archaic leadership, with equally archaic systems that should have been abandoned three decades ago.

In order to place more fire and brimstone on our public servants, the public often compares them with our private sector. This is a grievous mistake because in terms of modern management, innovation and corporate best practices, our private sector is the worst in the region. There is a reason why the Trinidadian corporate train has arrived. Our private sector is retail oriented and averse to serious risk taking. It is known as whiners and sophisticated beggars. It is only now ridding itself of proven racist practices in securing its top management. It is now abandoning all the interlocking directorships and other well known maladies with which it was afflicted since the abolition of slavery.

In a nutshell, both the public sector and the private sector are in need of progressive reform. One of the biggest mistakes made by the National Union of Public Workers (NUPW) was to become the concubine of the Democratic Labour Party. In many instances, that relationship has critically damaged its standing with the public.

64 responses to “Public and Private Sectors in Need of Urgent Reform”


  1. Sleepy Smith was an excellent representative of the St Michael South Central constituency. I can personally attest to this fact.
    On another point, nobody is trying to ignore Barrow’s contribution but a very critical analysis will show that he defended the status quo to the end. How come we can be critical of Sir Grantley Adams and not Barrow?

  2. millertheannunaki Avatar

    @ balance September 10, 2016 at 7:24 AM
    “Fair Trading Commission: close down not serving the interests of the consumers
    Central Bank of Barbados: close down and let it be an arm run from the ministry of finance as it was before.”

    I do not totally agree with you in respect of the Fair trading Commission (FTC). As an important regulatory body it has a vital role to play in the pending (future) fully privatized commercial market place. What is required are additional legislative teeth and the removal of political interference in the selection of its management team and its decision making-process.

    But I totally support your call for the closure of the Central Bank in its present incarnation.
    I have previously posited a similar position of making some functions of the central bank a small division of the MoF. For instance, why can’t the issuing of and management of currency paper notes be done by the MoF given the rising tide of the use of electronic means to settle commercial transactions?

    The Central Bank is just too an expensive administrative behemoth to be fed in a free-for-all foreign exchange regime as will be required if the duty-free shopping with foreign money is to become legislatively active and operationally viable.

    We all know the monetary and fiscal statistics provided by the same Central Bank are just a tissue of lies massaged and manipulated to suit the partisan goals of the Guv and his political masters.
    What purposes do lies serve in planning for the monetary, fiscal and socio-economic development of Barbados?

    Up to this time neither can the MoF nor his created extension of his Pinocchio nose the Guv of the CB give a proper account of the missing $300 million which magically disappeared with a period of 3 months after the last set of general elections in February 2013.


  3. balance September 10, 2016 at 7:24 AM #

    “Central Bank of Barbados: close down and let it be an arm run from the ministry of finance as it was before.”

    Isn’t CBB an arm run from the ministry of finance now.


  4. A critical analysis would show EWB aachievements out numbered his negatives for the island more so than those which can be attibuted to Grantley Adams legacy who had a belief in saving Colonolism engraved with a sense of superiotity which he though was an entiltlement deserving of our Colonial masters
    There are those would continue to strip away this Great man achievements in earnest in light of the many achievments he gave to Barbados .

  5. millertheannunaki Avatar

    @ ac September 10, 2016 at 11:47 AM
    “A critical analysis would show EWB aachievements out numbered his negatives for the island more so than those which can be attibuted to Grantley Adams legacy who had a belief in saving Colonolism engraved with a sense of superiotity which he though was an entiltlement deserving of our Colonial masters..”

    Now here you go again with a cacophony of crap regurgitated to feed and fool your clones. There could have been no so-called Independence in white-controlled Bim without Adult Suffrage.

    Which would you think is more important? The introduction of Free Adult Suffrage for black Bajans or a false sense of imagination of Independence in which the commanding heights of the economy country are owned by foreigners and all institutions dictated by foreign agencies?

    Would you say Bim is better of today than Bermuda or the Cayman Islands?


  6. Miller the last part of your question should be directed to those whose quest for power and who followed after Barrows demise has netted us nothing of worth upon which we can secure our future

  7. millertheannunaki Avatar

    @ ac September 10, 2016 at 12:24 PM

    I would agree with your comment if you are prepared to include present lot of the DLP leaders who did not grow up stupid under the Union Jack and were indeed the prime recipients of the social and economic largesse distributed under EWB’s experiment.

    Now could you want a bigger socialist than Barrow who is an idol and icon without clay for the likes of Comissiong and your partner in hypocrisy Freedom crier.

  8. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    This was a robust round of posts.

    @FrustratedB are you not ‘cherry picking’ the narrative to suit your business centric focus. How does one balance ‘hands off the civil service’ as necessarily a bad thing IF, repeat IF, one sees them in the guise of the technocrat professionals who know their job dynamics well for whom the politician sets policy and gets out of their way. As compared to a political class that micromanages the ministry when they have neither the technical knowledge, have not studied the issue well or have not removed all the obvious conflicts of interest surrounding their election and then the operations of the ministry.

    You can conflate whatever narrative you want to meet your needs, clearly.

    Corporate culture is exactly similar to this political wasteland we inhabit. As was noted the principal difference is that in private enterprise the ability to terminate is easier. But the nepotism, conflicts and all other vices are seen many fold. Of course on the other side where is the excellence of work and accountability in government.

    If corporate executives had to sustain their tenure based on their employees’ well-being as politicians have to from their voters there would be a lot of bloated company payrolls also. That is self-evident based on the fact that executives terminate workers in a flash if it can improve their bottom line because their ‘voters’ (the shareholders) demand profits. The executives pander to the same base needs and emotions as the politicians. Let’s be clear on that. Different results expected but same motivations to get there.

    All that said, but yes most gov’t payrolls are too large and bureaucratic.

    Our economic recovery requires honest politicians establishing sound polices for a small island (still) without ‘mineable’ natural resources/minerals by employing well educated experienced practioners to create the well organized tarmacs upon which our corporate and educational leaders can fly their planes to the new horizons.

    As others have noted the format idea does not require a rocket scientist. But getting the honest, forth-right people to execute the idea clearly requires big-brain genetic manipulation. Or in simple Bajan…selective and specializing ‘breeding’.

    That is the problem, obviously.

  9. Anonymouse - TheGazer Avatar
    Anonymouse – TheGazer

    I find myself agreeing with ac and then with miller.
    Take a rest ac, that brain must be stressed out…

  10. de pedantic Dribbler Avatar
    de pedantic Dribbler

    @AC, no honest discussion on Errol Barrow could EVER strip away his many achievements. That would only come from people like yourself who can only see through partisan lens.

    We can discuss Barrow as father of the nation rationally and should be able to reflect on current behaviors (and criticize him) with a clear hind-sight on the impact of his generation and their leadership actions.

    It is absolutely impractical and nonsensical to suggest that “those whose quest for power and who followed after Barrows demise has netted us nothing of worth upon which we can secure our future”.

    The development and plans for the future for things as simple as the ABC Highway (which he opposed) are profound. Obviously, there has been tremendous economic/GDP since Barrow’s tenure…a signal to a vastly different set of conditions and plans that those he left n ’87.


  11. Miller there is no evidence of any socialist imprints in any of EWB policies which has been a bench mark and a guide to Barbados social progress and if what you say is true to a socialist agenda attached to Barrow then the argument of him maintaining the status quo is a artifically placed on political propaganda right alongside that of EWB being called a socialist.
    For what it is worth Comissiong has never hid or excuse his intentions or affilations alligned to socialism


  12. Sir yes there have been economic progress not only here but all over the world for small and large countries. However what underscore my argument are those policies which Barrow implemented and has served as long term instruments in good times and bad times for overall stability

    Yes there are none who have followed Barrow who have added any such policies which have been the bed rock of Barbados progress for long term stability

    Anyomous Gazer i think i will take that much needed time out


  13. to much fraud , to much lawyers , to much Ministers doing business that under cuts the public from making and getting work, ,a lack of rule of law and law applied equal ,to much taxes and Vat, to many liars, to many crooks, to many scumbags , to many wrong people acting like they are doing right, to many wrongs covered up by those deem to know the law,no free press , no freedom of information, to much bulling of the public,


  14. William Skinner September 10, 2016 at 10:55 AM #

    Sleepy Smith was an excellent representative of the St Michael South Central constituency. I can personally attest to this fact.@@@

    You have to be out your rabbit ass mind, Sleepy was a long time crook , liar , scumbag like most of the QC and lawyers today ,

    That is maybe how you end up in the Bay Plantation house, He must have sign over his Aunt Beatrice Henry to you as he did in Cherry Ave houses also owned by Beatrice Henry to Violet Beckles,

    One scumbags cover for another,and life goes on like nothing ever happen,
    Time short ,

    St Michael South is a pit , full of good people that was lied to for many years,, the people are in pain and not even the lying ass PM can help, Hes walking on egg shells as the truth comes out about him ,

    There is no Brittons Hill Plantation in Barbados public records and yet your pm is Rep, of that area and lies about Bay Mansion written by the Barbados National Trust,

    Ever time you post lies We will come at you , you are nothing more than another AC on line,
    You now have NOTICE TO LEAVE THAT HOUSE, You nor your family will live there for long , So start looking for another place to live,The Ghost of the owner will see you at night,
    this is your September 11 2016

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading