Submitted by DAVID COMISSIONG, Citizen of Barbados
David Comissiong
David Comissiong

In the editorial entitled “Let’s be fair with Hyatt objections” published in the Weekend Nation of Friday the 2nd of September 2016, the Nation editorial- writer admonishes Barbadians like myself who oppose or have reservations about the proposed 15 storey Hyatt Hotel, to engage in thinking that “represents the national interest and not personal or narrow parochial or political motives.”

The editorial-writer goes on to acknowledge that vacant or available beachfront land is becoming increasingly scarce in Barbados, but then insinuates that the correct response to this situation is for the “regulators” to permit the construction of multi-storey hotels or other buildings (higher than six or seven storeys) on the remaining areas of available beachfront property!

Well, I would like to totally disagree with the position of the editorial-writer, and I would like to suggest that the diametrically opposite position that I hold is actually what in the best long term interest of Barbados! 

My position is that there are already too many hotels and other buildings constructed on the beaches of Barbados,and that the time has come for our nation to pause and to seriously rethink this policy of permitting the construction of hotels and other permanent structures on our beaches — particularly on those beaches that qualify as truly the most outstanding and beautiful beaches or beachfront areas of our country .

As we are all aware, Barbados’ number one industry is tourism, and our number one tourism attraction is the beautiful beaches of our country! Well, isn’t it a fact that we have done serious damage to the natural beauty of a vast number of the most outstanding and prized beaches of our country by permitting the construction of hotels and other buildings on these beaches?

Now, the mile long “Durban beach” in Durban, South Africa is reputed to be one of the most beautiful beaches in the world. Do you know how many hotels are built on Durban beach? Not a single one! All of the hotels are located on the land side of the Durban coastal highway!

The same is true of the world famous Copacabana and Ipanema beaches in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil! Indeed, even Miami beach in Florida has a fairly generous setback limitation from the coast, with minimal tourism construction being permitted on the beach side of the coastal highway.

As a matter of fact, many  countries have prohibited the construction of hotels on their most prized beaches, and several countries have imposed regulations that severely restrict the height of hotels, whether such hotels are located on the beach or on the land-side of the coastal highway!

Aren’t these policy positions that Barbados would do well to seriously contemplate?

Do we really want to see a Barbados in which our prized beachfront areas are inundated with giant 15 storey hotels?

Are tourists attracted to Barbados because of ultra-modern multi storey American-style hotels? Or isn’t it, rather, that they have an interest in experiencing the unique culture, heritage, social ambience and charm of Barbados and Barbadians? (And in answering this question, please refer to the fact that the single most popular tourist attraction in Barbados is the Oistins Fish Fry!)

I, for one, honestly believe that Barbados has had its fill of hotels on its most prized and popular beaches, and also its fill of foreign-owned hotels!

If it were left up to me, future tourism development in Barbados would feature and be based upon locally owned hotels and guest houses that fit snugly into our environment, and that radiate the unique hospitality, culture and charm of Barbados and Barbadians. That , to me, is what real development is all about– Barbadians doing for self and owning the most precious resources of their own country.

These views might differ from those of the Nation’s editorial-writer, but I can assure him or her that they are not based on a desire to “unfair” anyone, nor on “parochial or political motives”. Rather, they derive form a desire to provoke new thinking on what is in the best long term interest of the one nation that we all share in common.

118 responses to “Comissiong Responds to Nation Newspaper Editorial – TIME TO RE-THINK POLICY OF BUILDING ON OUR BEACHES”


  1. @Gabriel

    Are you saying that a decision by a PM who held Office for approximately 1year still holds currency in a landscape and market place that is constantly changing? Did none of his successors think to review that decision? Barrow disestablished the Anglican Church I hardly think that he would be afraid of the opinion of the Church when it came to casino gambling.

    BTW If Castro and his cohorts remain in charge of Cuba it will be a cold day in hell before they permit Casino gambling after all they blame casinos and mobsters for some of the ills that befell Cuba before the Revolution.


  2. With the invasion of the drug culture and the recent spa of drug related crime. The last thing any govt would permit on the island casino gambling


  3. It was hilarious when Tom reminded Harold the Dane that the plot on which his cathedral is built was purchased with ill gotten gains.Harold was among the chosen who was critical of the bandits and guess what.Tom put him in charge of a commission to look into gambling and to make recommendations.Later,Errol made a remark in response to having a church service at Harold the Dane’s cathedral and his response was words to the effect that he wasn’t going in there to listen to any mambo jambo.


  4. On my tour of the casinos in Aruba,I was in awe of the expense and the artistic woodwork in mahogany that went into those buildings.My tour included the sanctum sanctorum where the beans are counted.It was ultra taste in furnishings,lovely ladies in waiting,well groomed and classily clad with just a hint of daring.Drinks,smokes,food all complimentary.Lovely well endowed old ladies and their other half enjoying a pastime of their choice in super comfort.
    Another strategy that the tourism planners in Aruba brought out and implemented was the introduction of their own airline Air Aruba which I was told on a subsequent visit to Aruba in the 90’s was directed by a young Barbadian highly skilled in Marketing.That carrier chose its target markets intelligently and flew to those cities to facilitate its business plan.
    The idea of pre checking passengers should have been implemented here ages ago.Bahamas has had it years.I speak subject to correction but I think Haiti also.The lazy officials here are all about talk and eat-a-food mentality pounding their chests……’man, I is a minister man,you cahn tell me nutten dat I en know’……Meanwhile unless Barbados is categorized as grade 1 according to the DOT they will not get pre clearance facilities.The only country which had pre clearance was Trinidad during the days of Bwee when carnival traffic between the 2 countries was big business.


  5. Trinidad’s passenger pre clearance facility was with Barbados.


  6. Aruba: Yes, look at it closely. Still a Dutch territory, but also local parliament. So everybody has a Dutch passport. GDP (ref.wikipedia): $28,924 per capita. Any questions?


  7. @ WW&C

    Your mention of Jews at 8:40 AM is gratuitous and does not help your case.
    Where is the evidence that Altman’s idea of islands off Barbados has anything to do with Jews?

    I think that your desire for change in Barbados is well intentioned but your posts lately have been laced with so much hate that I (and probably others) have been skipping over them.
    As I said, this does not help your case.


  8. The window of opportunity for having Casinos is closed for barbados. No govt would entertain such an idea in 2016. Maybe in the late eighties and nineties pursuing would have been much easier again barbados missed the goal and passed the ball to other countries who could not help but say Thank You.
    Keep harping on Sandals as a negative for barbados is political poppy cock.

  9. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Old Baje…ya shoulda skip ovr this one too.

    Look..again, nothing those parasites on the island do affects me….it does however affects you, who live there, this is not a popularity contest so obviously you will not be seeing me tell you what you want to hear. I skip over most posts, so why do you feel someone skipping over my posts would bother me.

    As to the hate….do you know how many of my relatives are jewish.

    As soon as someone posts anything with an inkling of truth, yall fowls get ya panties in a twist, so tell me Baje..why was Altman not granted permission to build manmade islands in the sea off Barbados….as a matter of fact…you should tell me why would Altman want to build islands in the sea off Barbados…while ya at it you should tell me why Altman built that big old laundromat called Limegrove down Holetown where no one can afford to shop….. on land that does not belong to him.

    Ya sound just like those lowlife jews in NY who are slum lords, ecstaty pushers, money launderers, organ harvesters, land thieves etc….as soon as people talk the truth…ya antisemitic.

    Dont get me started. .ya not talking to ya average docile bajan.

  10. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    You do know Baje that the land Altman’s laundromat Limegrove is on is in litigation….right.


  11. @ WW&C

    You sure Altman was refused permission? Or he just couldn’t convince potential investors?

    Tell us about the Limegrove land litigation. Don’t be selfish.

    Talking about getting panties in a twist. This Hyatt thing is a storm in a teacup. Edghill and Maloney do not have that kind of money and are yet to attract a significant investor.


  12. WW&C
    I recall two known west coasters telling me a couple years ago that the grove was losing money and what a great pity it was,such a fine concept etc so there might be more in the mortar according to your post.

  13. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Baje…that’s just it, none of them have the money, Altman, Maloney, Bizzy the few millions they got stashed, they aint about to take and drop into a hole of a failur……so if they can find some mook with deep pockets….hallelujah….ALL of them are looking to dupe investors AND SELL YALL…as bonus…lol…they are looking for anoth bilionaire like the dude from Florida Bjerkham had, but he croaked.

    I will send you to research who owned the Lascelles plantation along with 4 other plantations on the island….I am surprised that the Barbados ministers got the nerve to want to do business in Panama….many descendants of bajans still live there and would know it’s the government in Bim betrayed the bajans who worked on the canal, stole the plantations they bought and sold them to any lowlife who smiled at them.

    Gabriel….the biggest question is…why would you build such a monstrosity and cater only to the people who visit the island a few months a year and most of whom cannot afford to shop at Limegrove……and…neither can the 275,000 people who live on the island.

  14. millertheannunaki Avatar
    millertheannunaki

    @ Old Baje September 6, 2016 at 3:28 PM #
    “Talking about getting panties in a twist. This Hyatt thing is a storm in a teacup. Edghill and Maloney do not have that kind of money and are yet to attract a significant investor.”

    You are right about that one Old Baje, the gullible Bajans are indeed getting their knickers in a twist about this Hyatt malarkey. Many of them are carrying the impression that Hyatt is going to build the hotel the same way they have been fooled into believing there would have been a Four Seasons resort.

    The issue at hand is where the money coming from. I would really like to see those investors who would take up that sort of money and build a tower in a growing shanty town in a sector of an industry that is fast approaching its sell-by-date. There is very little of attraction about this tower to justify the large investment. What is the ROI for this project over an expected 10 year horizon in a most competitive industry that largely depends on massive government concessions to achieve even the minimum profitability?

    Since the Hyatt project is not designed to attract the modern eco-conscious, environmentally and culturally savvy tourists would the government be expected to grant the investors and the hotel management the right to operate a casino aka private gambling club or even a nudist beach barricaded to keep out the riffraff, beach-bums and the pretentious voyeurs hiding behind the cloak of religious hypocrisy?

    Hyatt would be fine for Bridgetown if the intention is to turn it into a mini Amsterdam.
    Pornville should definitely lend his support to this idea if Bim is to save its sorry tourism ass from the phoenix called Cuba.

    But then again there might just a lot of dirty money out there looking for a home including Greenverbs Parris millions.

  15. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Miller…is only the retards ACs believe Hyatt is taking their billions to build a hotel, filled with controversy, on Browne’s beach….maybe Dumbville believes it too…maybe Maloney told Dumbville so…..lol

    You ain’t see the lotta zeros the ACs been quoting about Hyatt this and Hyatt that…and they richer than god…lol.

    Ya dealing with idiots.


  16. Interesting information that the Chief Town Planner resigned from the Heritage Committee or whatever it is called. More interesting is to read the comments of his replacement read he is not answering any questions about Hyatt and to ask the CTP. As Chairman of a Heritage UNESCO Committee one would have thought he had a lot more to say.


  17. millertheannunaki September 6, 2016 at 4:18 PM #

    “Hyatt would be fine for Bridgetown if the intention is to turn it into a mini Amsterdam.”

    According to a story in the Nation, Charles Lewis, the owner of Charlie Spice Experience says there are 2,000 to 3 000 girls working in the adult entertainment industry in Barbados at any point in time.

    So there is a trained labour already in place to turn Bridgetown into a mini Amsterdam if it it not already there.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading