Many Barbadians have been following the shouting match between Anderson Cherry who is the managing director of Jose Y Jose Liquid and Solid Waste Management Inc  and Ralph ‘Bizzy’ Williams the head of Williams Industries and the other half of the Williams dynamic duo.

The upside to the public disagreement between the two is the public awareness it brings to the issue of waste management in Barbados. It is obvious the government of Barbados continues to struggle with building and executing a waste management strategy. The Cahill Scam provides confirmation for the doubting thomases. By the way, when will the government of Barbados show respect to the electorate of Barbados by sharing an update about Cahill?

Anderson Cherry will have to await the decision of Director of Public Prosecutions Charles Leacock to see if the challenge by the Chief Town Planner Mark Cummins has merit.  Cherry has been accused of creating an illegal dump in an abandoned quarry as part of a business initiative to recycle waste. It is interesting to note that Cherry consulted with former Chief Town Planner Lennie St. Hill – now a town planning consultant – who has given the green light to the project. How a former Town Planner and the incumbent Town Planner are able to disagree on the interpretation of the applicable town planning law must be a worry to those who promote the high literacy of Barbadians.

BU will not become immersed in the legality of  whether Anderson Cherry’s Project Recycle Limited is a legal operation. Whatever the outcome of the legal matter brewing BU offers hearty congratulations to Cherry for attempting to implement an approach to waste management that  involves behavioural change at the ‘retail’ level. Obviously Cherry’s approach threatens Bizzy given his interest in Sustainable Barbados Recycling Centre (SBRC). It appears the government entered a sweetheart arrangement with SBRC to sell waste to them at taxpayers expense. The imposition of the controversial tipping fee was meant to raise revenue to pay down arrears owed to SBRC by government. What is up with successive governments of Barbados entering agreements with private contractors and reluctant to be transparent about it? BU recalls the SSA contracting heavy equipment from Sir Cow, at great expense, to operate at the landfill while unable to repair government vehicles procured to do the job. Another transaction done in the dark.

It is also interesting to note the effort of another Black Barbadian who has been a pioneer in the recycle business in Barbados. Why is it Paul Bynoe and Anderson Cherry are being frustrated in the effort to implement projects that will help Barbados with its waste management problem and in the process generate foreign exchange? Why is it Bizzy Williams appear to be able to win projects from government with signed guarantees from government? The comments by the Auditor General about the Ionics project also comes to mind. Some thing smells rotten about the whole affair.

It is unfathomable Minister Denis Lowe has been allowed to preside over a ministry which has been afflicted with a level of ineptness hitherto unknown to Barbadians. It is unacceptable the issue of B’s Recycling predates this government. It is unbelievable Bizzy is on record admitting to pledging financial support to BOTH political parties – why does anyone think he does it? In our 50th year of Independence a Black government of Barbados cannot continue to give most of the ‘cake’ to a few. The high colour Bizzys, COWs, Maloneys, Bjerkhams always appear to win the deals from government while the darker Cherrys, Bynoes struggle with bank overdrafts. BU understands that Bynoe purchased a piece of equipment to enhance B’s Recycling operation and it has been unused for several years. If Barbados continues down the current path  there will come a time when Mugabe type decisions will be the only course of action i.e. the call for the redistribution of wealth.

A word to the ignorant and the greedy should be sufficient.

108 responses to “The Bizzy Cherry Mess – Fight Over Waste”


  1. Question,
    Who owns ICBL?

  2. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Why don’t you tell us Alvin……who owns ICBL. What I can tell you is that when claims were put forward to ICBL as insurers for Transport Board, the valid claims were paid and claimants never had cause to complain…it is still talked about today.

    I also had cause to do the research just to verify that CGI was not just carrying on a tradition of avoiding paying all claims regardless…for the last 15 years, is it.

    Now if it’s local whites owning ICBL….that makes you look how.

    I am so glad you asked that question…..thanks Alvin….lol


  3. @Alvin
    ICBL is majority owned by an insurance company based in Bermuda.

  4. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    http://www.nationnews.com/nationnews/news/77490/parris-accounts-remain-frozen

    Ha, ha

    Parris’ accounts remain frozen
    Heather-Lynn Evanson, heatherlynnevanson@nationnews.com
    Added 05 February 2016

    hal-gollop-and-leroy-parris
    Queen’s Counsel Hal Gollop (left) and former CLICO chairman Leroy Parris making their way to court. (Picture by Xtra Vision Photography.)

    THE WAIT CONTINUES and the millions in former CLICO’s chairman Leroy Parris’ account remain frozen.
    Related articles
    Parris suing the state
    Gollop silent on $3m ruling
    $3m bill facing Parris
    Today, Parris and his legal team of Queen’s Counsel Vernon Smith and Queen’s Counsel Hal Gollop were back in court, this time before Justice Olson Alleyne, in the chambers of the Supreme Court No. 11.
    The matter has been adjourned until February 25.
    Parris and his attorneys are seeking to have $4.5 million belonging to him and his company Branlee Consulting, frozen by High Court judge Justice William Chandler on January 27, 2015, released. CLICO’s judicial manager, Deloitte Consulting is trying to get back $3.3 million.

    Gollop and Smith told NATION ONLINE that a timetable, however, had been set for the matters to be heard and dealt with.
    “We have not been able to agree on anything that would remove the list of things we want addressed,” Gollop said.
    But in the interim, neither side can touch the millions in Parris’ account, including the judicial manager, which was represented yesterday by attorney Ramon Alleyne.
    Attempts to reach Alleyne were unsuccessful.
    Parris and his attorneys are seeking to have $4.5 million belonging to him and his company Branlee Consulting, frozen by High Court judge Justice William Chandler on January 27, 2015 released, CLICO’s judicial manager, Deloitte Consulting, tries to get back $3.3 million.
    Gollop and Smith told NATION ONLINE that a timetable, however, had been set for the matters to be heard and dealt with.
    “We have not been able to agree on anything that would remove the list of things we want addressed,” Gollop said.
    But in the interim, neither side can touch the millions in Parris’ account, including the judicial manager, which was represented yesterday by attorney Ramon Alleyne.

  5. Reflecting the Pride Avatar
    Reflecting the Pride

    I miss Prof Neville Duncan’s analysis of the socio-economic tapestry of Barbados. A Jamaican who you felt had the best interests of Barbados at heart the insights from him were always refreshing. Where has he gone?

  6. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Well Well & Consequences February 5, 2016 at 11:14 AM

    The country called Barbados is so pretentiously corrupt it is unbelievable given its former good reputation as a place where law and order prevailed.

    The question to be asked is if the transaction of the $3.3 million to the real beneficiary Leroi via his shell company Branlee Consulting was indeed a legal or illegal payment.

    If it has been deemed “illegal” then one must ask if it should not be considered eligible to fall under the purview of the Money Laundering legislation CAP. 129

    Clearly, the Commissioner of the BRA ought to be interested in the transaction, legal or illegal, to see if it was duly declared as assessable income by the relevant taxpayer since it was styled as gratuity Payment by Thompson Associates, a law firm whose principals were sworn to uphold the law.

    If the BRA authorities have failed to undertake such a simple acid test of tax compliance one is left to wonder what’s the difference between the assumed law breaker and those entrusted to uphold the law.
    If (and a big IF indeed) the taxpayer has failed to meet his legal obligations under the Income Tax Act (the ‘old’ Division C – Income from office or employment) one ought to most surprised over this ‘obvious’ oversight by the authorities; whether caused through professional laxity or for whatever reason.

    And here we want to crucify, in hypocritical Bim, a school child for disobeying a teacher’s instruction to pick up litter.

    “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (Jeff C, the BU classicist, can expatiate on the ultimate need to protect the Treasury at all cost, republic or no republic).

  7. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Lol…Miller…….we now get to see if the due diligence re 3.3 million unexplained and unaccounted for check, which was overlooked before by the authorities, will now be applied…they cannot hide that one for sure, no matter how hard they try.

    The judiial managers for Clico want that money and will keep any amount of noise to get it back..lol

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading