Submitted by David Comissiong, Clement Payne Movement
David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

The members of the Caribbean Pan-African Network (CPAN) – a Pan- Caribbean organization with Chapters and members in some seventeen Caribbean territories– would like to inform United Kingdom Prime Minister

[…]

David Cameron that we are not interested in his 300 Million pound so-called Aid package!

As far as we are aware, the Caribbean people have not asked Mr Cameron or his U K Government for Aid or for any form of charity! Indeed, proud and right-thinking Caribbean people are not interested in receiving Aid from the likes of Mr Cameron and his U K Government!

What we are interested in, and what we have asked for and demanded, is REPARATIONS!

All we want from Mr Cameron and his U K government is what we are entitled to as a matter of international law and morality, and that is Reparations– in the form of capital payments and developmental projects– to compensate for the tremendous damage inflicted on the sons and daughters of Africa ( across multiple generations) as a result of the centuries-long CRIME of European-orchestrated slavery, slave trade and associated acts of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Our organisation also wishes to inform Mr Cameron that he does not possess the “locus standi” nor the moral authority to tell us that we must “move on” from the deep wounds of slavery. Indeed, how does one “move on” from a deep wound that has not been repaired or healed?

Mr Cameron is the descendant of a criminal who, in the early 19th century, participated in the enslavement and criminal exploitation of the black people of the Caribbean , and who, after appropriating the material benefits of the unpaid labour that he brutally squeezed out of our black ancestors, went on to pocket the present day equivalent of 4.5 million pounds in so-called compensation for the loss of what he considered to be his human property. How – against the back ground of this history – does Mr Cameron arrogate to himself the right to lecture us about how we must respond to or deal with our pain and injury?

Can it be that Prime Minister Cameron’s whole attitude towards us is one steeped in condescension and contempt?

Indeed, what else could it be than contempt when the Governments and people of the Caribbean ask for the repair and healing of grievous wounds, and Mr Cameron responds by offering to build a prison in Jamaica to incarcerate black Jamaicans who he no longer wishes to accommodate in the UK?

Someone- some proud and clear-sighted citizen of the Caribbean- needs to tell Mr Cameron where he can take his prison and shove it!

We reiterate that the Caribbean people are not interested in either the physical prison that Mr Cameron is proposing to build in Jamaica or in the other metaphorical and psychological prisons that he proposes to inflict on the dignity and spirit of our people with his rejection of Reparations and his substitute so-called Aid package.

You see, we — the people of the Caribbean –are gradually coming to an understanding that the first and most basic principle of the Reparations Movement is that the very demand for Reparations constitutes– in itself– an indispensable validation by us of our own precious humanity!

We have come to perceive that if we fail to demand that the present day representatives and beneficiaries of those persons, institutions and nations that committed the most horrible crimes imaginable against our ancestors be held accountable and made to pay restitution, we would be implicitly sending a message to ourselves and to the world at large that we do not consider our ancestors (or ourselves) to be sacred beings imbued with inalienable rights and deserving of respect and justice.

And so, the mere act of demanding Reparations is important and is a critical component of the process that we must engage in as individuals and as a collective, of repairing ourselves!

Mr Cameron and all those who think like him should therefore rest assured that our Reparations demand will not go away. It will not go away– it cannot go away– because it a demand that is founded in law and morality!

At the end of the day, it does not matter what Mr Cameron or any other Prime Minister of Britain thinks about Reparations. All that is important is that, as a matter of law and morality, Reparations are due to the black or African descended people and nations of the world and must ultimately be paid!

Mr Cameron’s British government has already embarrassed and humiliated itself on this issue of Reparations. In the year 2001, the U K government attended the United Nations World Conference Against Racism (WCAR) and displayed their moral bankruptcy for the whole world to see, when they publicly declared that black or African people could not be entitled to Reparations because back in the 19th and 18th centuries it was “legal” to kidnap, enslave and brutalize black or African people!

So, if Mr Cameron and other representatives of the UK government wish to continue with this morally bankrupt charade of maintaining that 19th and 18th century black or African people were not really human-beings, but were soul-less chattels that could be lawfully kidnaped, raped, enslaved and worked to death, let them continue doing so. Indeed, let the foolish Emperor continue displaying his nakedness!

We– on the other hand– must know what WE need to do! By now it should have become clear to Sir Hilary Beckles, Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, Prime Minister Freundel Stuart, and all the other political leaders of the Caribbean that– contrary to their hitherto expressed expectations– it may well turn out that the Reparations issue will not be resolved in a non-confrontational, mutually respectful manner.

Our political leaders may well have to consider the very real possibility that people like David Cameron and the Government that he represents may have to be confronted and publicly embarrassed!

What I do know for sure is that we in CPAN are already convinced that the Caribbean’s campaign for Reparations will have to be designed– on the one hand– to bring on board with us all of our natural allies in Africa and the Diaspora, Latin America, and Asia and to enlist the tremendous weight of world public opinion on our side, and– on the other hand– to isolate and publicly hold up to international embarrassment and ridicule all those who perversely and unreasonably seek to deny and resist the manifest justice and righteousness of our claim to Reparations.

We therefore declare for all and sundry to hear :– let the campaign now begin in earnest, for , in the words of Barbados’ premier calypsonian– the Mighty Gabby: “Rise up you African children! Victory is certain! Victory is more than certain!”

67 responses to “Putting David Cameron in His Place!”

  1. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    David Cameron is descended from the families who owned slaves, have shares in Barclays Bank and Lloyds of London who funded slavery off the backs of black people. He is greedy and arrogant and has no intentions of giving up anything because he still benefits from the centuries old Trans-atlantic Slave Trade.

    It was a calculated risk on Cameron’s part because he knew he could still get away with insulting black people, had it been his ancestors, he would not get over it, he would get even and so would his people.

    If the Jamaican government had any brain power or balls, they would have asked him to leave Jamaica, but they still want to be begging England and Europe for grants so they humbly endure insults to their own people and to the memories of their ancestors.

    It’s a disgrace.

    Ugly, disgusting Ann Windsor the albino racist rat from the house of buckingham palace should not have been allowed to prance around Barbados the very same week either, it was an orchestrated insult to coincide with Cameron’s insults in Jamaica.

    Again, weak black leaders with low to no brain power who do not know and do not care about defending their own people or the memories of their ancestors, just looking for the next dollar (paper) with no common sense.


  2. David you and a thousand others have come very late to this party. I posted the article below, way back in July, informing the BU intelligentsia of a daring UK documentary that had the audacity to enlighten the ignorant British masses of the systemic and indelible tort generated from the UK’S slave economy which enabled the UK to remain a remarkably wealthy and by extension a very influential nation.

    @ Piece and Bush Tea, I have just spent a short period in East Africa and I can testify to you that I have never seen a greater collection of black feminine women – period! I did not encounter any obese women and I found them to be delightful. Unlike Donna they will not answer you back!

    @ David et al. keep up the good work.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/12/british-history-slavery-buried-scale-revealed


  3. @Exclaimer

    Thanks, not Ras has been submitting repatriation subject matter to BU for years now.

  4. Dr. Hadrian Hyndz Avatar
    Dr. Hadrian Hyndz

    I am descended from slaves. So are you. From slave-owners, too. Given the history of the human race, it could hardly be otherwise.

    Slavery was the normal form of social organization from the discovery of agriculture onwards. It may have been common among hunter-gatherers long before that, but the evidence is inconclusive. What we do know is that ownership of human beings is at least as old as civilization. The cities of Ur and Sumer, of Egypt and Persia, of the Indus Valley and Xia Dynasty China were built by forced labor.

    Slaves raised the Acropolis in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome. They piled up the ziggurats of Meso-America. Incas, Maoris, Apache: All accepted slavery as part of the natural order. An Aleutian tribe kept a special caste of boys raised as girls for the sexual gratification of its chiefs. An early Indian clan bred slave children for the specific purpose of sacrificing them. Slavery was so endemic in Africa that it became more common following the abolition of the Atlantic trade.

    This history is what makes arguments about reparations so bizarre. The people paying up would be statistically certain to have both owners and owned in their family tree; so would the people accepting compensation.

    Jamaican politicians are currently demanding reparations from Britain for its role in the trans-Atlantic traffic. Because slavery was such an abominable practice, people naturally feel a need to express their revulsion. When we read of the monstrous conditions on the ships and in the plantations, we want to tell someone how wretched we feel about the whole thing.
    But tell whom? There has been much press comment in the Caribbean about the fact that David Cameron is descended from a slave-owner called General Sir James Duff, who was compensated for the emancipation of 202 slaves when the institution was abolished in 1833.

    Still, here’s a hard thing that needs saying. Cameron, like most British people, is only very distantly related to a plantation owner. General Duff is, as far as I can work out, his sixth cousin. Isn’t it statistically likely that some of the Jamaican politicians demanding compensation are more directly descended from plantation owners than he is?

    Which brings us to the absurdity of assigning collective national guilt in these situations. Should a Jamaican who migrated to Britain in the 1950s now be liable to pay reparations to his family who remained behind?

    Don’t get me wrong, Britain and Jamaica have been through a great deal together. Jamaicans volunteered in large numbers to fight for Britain in two world wars. The reason this whole debate has come up is that Mr. Cameron visited Jamaica to announce a substantial trade and investment package, rightly recognizing the ties between our two islands.

    But valuing such ties is a world away from assigning hereditary guilt — which was, paradoxically, the justification for slavery in many societies. Quite apart from being immoral, the argument is unsustainable.
    When the issue of reparations comes up, half-clever white people in Britain sometimes say things like, “Well, in that case, I want reparations from Denmark for the Viking invasions.” To which one answer is: You’re the one likely to be descended from Vikings; the Danes of today are descended from the ones who stayed behind. Similarly, who is likelier to have slave-owners in his or her family tree: An African-American, or a Polish-American?

    Britain, unlike the United States, followed a policy of compensated manumission: Slave-owners were bought out, meaning that the institution was abolished much earlier, and without a civil war. Some leftist activists regard these payments as shameful, and Ron Paul was excoriated when he suggested that the U.S. should have done something similar.

    But surely the fact that people were prepared to pay to abolish slavery is a cause for pride, not shame. If we absolutely insist on singling Britain out, let’s consider the truly exceptional factor, namely that, after thousands of years of slavery, Britain was the country that poured its resources and energy into stamping out the traffic, even diverting ships from a life-and-death struggle with Napoleon to intercept Atlantic slavers.

    Should we Brits demand compensation from the rest of the world for having played that role? Of course not. We’re all individuals, responsible for our own actions. That, if you think about it, was the philosophy that destroyed slavery in the first place.


  5. When I hear England and the United States of America talk about human rights,I get nauseous and angry all at the same time.
    Those White criminals decimated other people’s homeland,stole their property and in the process killed millions of human beings.They now have the audacity to talk about human rights.Give me a f—g break.
    Eventhough David Cameron is the leader of England that bastard should be made Persona Non Grata to all Black populated states of this world especially those in Africa and the Caribbean.
    When will our weak knee stupid ass leaders stop going cup in hand begging the stinking White killers of this world for assistance. We have it within ourselves to chart our own destiny.Black people of this world do not need the stinks of Europe for survival.
    To hell with David Cameron and his insult to us by offering to build a prison for Jamaican criminals.Instead he should build a prison for his own kith & kin murders & thieves

  6. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Dr. Hadrian Hyndz October 6, 2015 at 3:44 PM

    We are rather impressed with your erudite historical analysis of the pathology of slavery.
    We get the impression that you see the loss of hundred of thousands of lives during the trans-Atlantic voyage as mere collateral damage similar to commercial cargo lost, damaged or spoilt in transit to be written off or to be the plaything of Loss Adjusters hired by some name at Lloyd’s of London.

    No wonder there is so much moral justification underscored by Jehovah Jireh’s directives for the institution of slavery as outlined in the Judeo-Christian book of cultural rules and regulations.
    It’s also interesting to note that a ‘doctored’ version of this same book of social and mental control was produced during the reign of King James representing the start of the period of England’s effluence into the ‘colonisation’ of the new World, especially the Caribbean and its exploitation of resources of the Gold Coast of West Africa.

    Be that as it may, let us agree that the case for Reparations cannot be gainsaid because of the precedent set by the same English or British government by inadvertently compensating the former slave owners.; not for loss of land or business assets but for loss of the ownership of other human beings made by your God and who ought to have been standing equally in Its sight.

    The laws of Equity and Natural Justice demand that reparations be given to the descendants of those exploited souls who only “sin” was to be born with a skin that could withstanding the effects of working long hours in the Sun unlike the Irish and the poor and wretched from the other British Isles.

    Our only proviso is that not one ‘red’ penny or 5 pence be given in cash to the modern governments of those territories in the Caribbean with significant populations of African descent. This so-called cash reparations in ‘cash’ would be akin to throwing water in the Atlantic as sacrifice to the sharks that dined lusciously on the flesh of naked Africans thrown overboard on those death ships of the triangular trade.

    Such cash settlements would certainly end up in bank accounts not in the City of London, but in China, Korea, Japan and India with the descendants of the black slaves still the wretched of the Earth as Fanon would so describe.


  7. @ Negroman,
    I understand your sentiments. Sadly, wherever you find the black man you will find someone whose mind remains underdeveloped. Like a child, he clings to both his maternal and paternal parents. They will spoon feed this man child a number of trinkets: the gun, the bible, drugs, democracy and a rafter of material goods, produce and ideas which have been designed to retard his mind.

    Then along comes a certain europhile – Dr. Hadrian Hyndz – who presents a brief but compelling article that attempts to contextualise slavery through an historical timeline. Quite frankly, I do not appreciate the man’s detached academic prose. I have no interest in his views. I do not want to be told by A.N. Other that slavery has being practised throughout history and that to seek reparations is futile.

    @ millertheanunnaki , Good reply.


  8. David Cameron is ‘ignorant’ over slavery reparations, says Danny Glover

    Prime minister under fire from Lethal Weapon actor and activist over comments that Jamaica should ‘move on’ from slavery

    http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/06/david-cameron-slavery-reparations-danny-glover-jamaica


  9. I honestly believe the position taken by David Cameron ought to be highlighted to all other Caribbean leaders and leaders of Black dominated countries on the thinking of the beneficiaries of slavery.
    Prime Minister of Jamaica,Portia Simpson Miller is a major disappointment. I cannot believe that Miss Miller is willing to accept that insulting offer from David Cameron.A stupid leader indeed. I agree with the opposition in Jamaica to boycott thedamn parliament on that matter.
    The Caribbean approach to the reparation issue seems quite conflicting and confusing.Not surprising it is like West Indies cricket.
    Foolish leaders we have in the Caribbean.Portia Simpson Miller you are a big letdown.I hope you re-visit your position of accepting assistance of building a prison from David Cameron.If not I hope the opposition and the people of Jamaica up the ante to remove you as Prime Minister of Jamaica.Black people in the Caribbean do not want jack ass Prime Ministers like you leading us anymore.
    To hell with Cameron and his insult.
    Exclaimer,I do not read articles or comments from anyone trying to justify slavery.

  10. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    As long as it’s understood that Cameron still has the slimy mindset of the unrepentant slave master and would not change it for anything, half the battle has been won. The upside to his arrogant insults is that he is opening even wider, the eyes of those who are already open. Except of course for the idiot politicians/lawyers/doctors in the Caribbean, Barbados included, who crave the pimphood titles out of the island of England, these useless so and so’s have no shame.


  11. The difference with this slavery was that they brought people here and have diluted us and erased our culture until we don’t even know who we are. We have no idea exactly which country we should return to and even if we did we wouldn’t fit in. And besides that by colonizing Africa they have made such a mess that we might be better off staying here. Here on these tiny rocks with very little natural resources handicapped by our size and a damaged psyche we are now forced to compete with those larger and more developed countries whose economies we have built as though it were a level playing field. And along comes the WTO holding us to rules that the more developed countries have never and will never follow themselves.

    But we can rise above all this. We can.


  12. Unfortunately we have leaders like dear Portia et al whom we would need to remove first. Near- sighted, pathetic, grasping, hopeless imposters whom Cameron can afford to smear with filth while they smile and call it chocolate.


  13. Exclaimer,

    Am I to understand that your definition of a feminine woman is one who does not answer you back? You can have all of them for yourself because don’t think Bushie and Pieces have a liking for boring, servile mutes. They obviously like women who speak when they have something sensible to say. They obviously like a little excitement and challenge not a doormat upon which they can wipe their feet. Strong men who can handle a strong woman. LOL

  14. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Finally……. former Jamaican Prime Minister P.J Patterson certainly put David Cameron, the slave master wannabe, in his place today.

    When will the black leaders of the Caribbean who are the current holders of taxpayer funded offices get some balls against the lowlifes in Europe, some in the Americas who still believe, with their sick delusional minds, that blacks are still beasts of burden and should forget slavery and it’s present day effects that are still very destructive.

  15. Well Well & Consequences Avatar
    Well Well & Consequences

    Donna said:

    “Here on these tiny rocks with very little natural resources handicapped by our size and a damaged psyche we are now forced to compete with those larger and more developed countries whose economies we have built as though it were a level playing field. And along comes the WTO holding us to rules that the more developed countries have never and will never follow themselves.”

    Donna……it goes even deeper, the islands in the Caribbean are still used by the industrialized countries to enrich each other, sell the islands to each other above the heads of the jokers calling themselves black leaders/politicians/lawyers/doctors, who are clueless and so caught up in their self-serving antic, they have no idea what’s happening and cannot fathom the diabolical plots still enacted against black people.

    Cameron would not have dared to make such insulting, insensitive and arrogant comments if he did not still feel himself to be one of the owners of the Caribbean islands and by testing the waters he sees that 50 years, some older, after political independence, most of the black leaders have no balls and would tolerate anything done to their people and memories of their ancestors.


  16. Interesting to see the abuse being hurled at Portia in Jamaica for her deferential response to the snobbery and contempt of David Cameron.
    How did Jamaica become a beggar nation in less than 50 years? Wasn’t it the result of unwise borrowing by the proud and articulate but utterly incompetent Michael Manley? And wasn’t Manley under constant pressure to perform economic miracles by the hundreds of thousands of poverty-stricken voters who keep demanding impossible results from leaders who have neither the knowledge nor the integrity their jobs require?
    Arithmetic democracy can be a terrible thing. Barbados, Are you listening? Or are we doomed to follow the same path.


  17. chad99999,

    I was not one of those “poverty stricken voters” who made impossible demands. I never had a great thirst for champagne and caviar. I prefer mauby and sea eggs. Therefore I can take issue with the corned beef politicians who have with the support of many brought us to this pathetic point.

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading