The video submitted by Ras Jahaziel of Rastafarivisions.com. The site on the Inter Net where you will find virtual Art Galleries, videos, the best roots music, and insightful articles to awaken the mind and release the Genie […] (US)from the bottle of mental slavery.
The site on the Inter Net where you will find virtual Art Galleries, videos, the best roots music, and insightful articles to awaken the mind and release the Genie […]
(US)from the bottle of mental slavery.
Even though dis deserves no comment for the sheer ineptitude of the video, we can go back centuries and look for blame, but not fix our blame on black brothers now raping and killing their own in Africa today, and we still want to blame the white man. Now the Chinese in Africa more than anyone else, are they the next scapegoats?
A black man can do anything he wants in this world TODAY if he can get pass the guilt shit thrown out every day like this video.
Konkieman
Why do I see man inhumanity to man far more greater that mere skin colour you have referenced? This moral-evil that resides in the human heart and does not limits itself to what the media wants to conditions us to accept as the prevailing opinion regarding a specific race, religion, creed, political-leaning and sexual-orientation is true for all of us.
the video is self explanatory taking us along a path detailing how some people lives became enriched at the expense of many.
Yet beyond the imagination of the manipulator/s and the mastermind /s of political wealth and power were they unable to foresee that beyond the horizon in time there dastardly deeds would be exposed for all to see,
Jeremiah 5:26-28King James Version
26 For among my people are found wicked men: they lay wait, as he that setteth snares; they set a trap, they catch men.
27 As a cage is full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit: therefore they are become great, and waxen rich.
28 They are waxen fat, they shine: yea, they overpass the deeds of the wicked: they judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge.
Sounds familiar and applicable today
What a load of shite! Childish video,stupid comments by ac.
Stupid reply. coming from a empty mindless bookworm who still loves living as a cave dweller
And the bored said to AC reparations are dueth,….and shall be paydeth…….. in sargassum
The fact that this makes sense to AC says it all…..
Why even bother to answer a bunch of brainwashed clowns
Troubled Land
Why did Europeans enslaved Africans ?
Europeans needed labourers to work for them in mines or plantations in the Americas. In the process of conquest they had annihilated many of the native peoples ( by murder,disease & force labour).
The Europeans tried two solutions: export prisoners, and export men who indentured themselves to pay off debts. But both groups either succumbed to diseases , or ran away to freedom.
Europeans knew they couldn’t survive working long hours in Sun .
Scientific evidence over the year confirm this point.
New research suggests that genes tied to blue eyes and red hair could put people at higher risk for moles or freckling in childhood, which are often precursors to the deadly skin cancer melanoma later in life.
Redheads and fair skinned people are more susceptible to developing skin cancer, regardless of whether or not they expose their skin to the sun, researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) reported in the journal Nature.
If you have fair skin, blond, red, or light brown hair, blue eyes, or freckles your risk is increased. According to the American Cancer Society, the risk of melanoma is about 20 times higher for whites than for African-Americans. The reason lies in the pigment melanin.
“Generation after generation after generation after generation of whites have, without even the consideration of making restitution for them, lived off the atrocities of their fathers. Did they think Mother Nature and Ra would not hold them accountable for their greed, hate and conspiracy?
Racism first developed when “Modern” Whites first entered Europe from Central Asia, at around the beginning of the modern era, the Roman historian Tacitus commented on the strange appearance of the newly arrived Germanic tribes.
Quote from: The Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-118 A.D.) Tacitus: Germany Book 1 [1]. 4. For my own part, I agree with those who think that the tribes of Germany are free from all taint of intermarriages with foreign nations, and that they appear as a distinct, unmixed race, like none but themselves. Hence, too, the same physical peculiarities throughout so vast a population. All have fierce blue eyes, red hair, huge frames, fit only for a sudden exertion. They are less able to bear laborious work. Heat and thirst they cannot in the least endure; to cold and hunger their climate and their soil inure them.
Though the anecdotal data is overwhelming that they are Albinos, Europeans have never been able to accept that simple fact. Instead European scientists have engaged in pseudo science to prove that rather that being an unfortunate medical condition, their coloration is due to “Natural Selection”. In other words, Albinism (White skin) is a sign of “Advanced Evolution”.
Obviously Europeans are conflicted and delusional about their skin color. On the one hand, they know intuitively that their color can’t be healthy and natural, their predisposition to skin cancer proves that. But on the other hand, they can’t stand to admit the obvious truth either.
from realhistorywww.
@zimbab September 21, 2015 at 10:31 PM “Though the anecdotal data is overwhelming that they are Albinos, Europeans have never been able to accept that simple fact. Instead European scientists have engaged in pseudo science to prove that rather that being an unfortunate medical condition, their coloration is due to “Natural Selection”. In other words, Albinism (White skin) is a sign of “Advanced Evolution”.
Oh dear.
Natural selection does NOT mean”Advanced Evolution” All human populations are the same age and all human populations came out of Africa at about the same time. All organisms adapt to the circumstances in which they find themselves. White skin is nothing more and nothing less than an adaption to living in places with little sunshine. White skin permits those who live in the far north to get enough Vitimin D from sunshine. Insufficient Vitimin D means weak bones, rickets, great difficulty in bearing living children, short life expectancy, death of a population. So for the people who moved far north natural selection favoured white or light skin.
People who have always lived near the equator have not selected white skin because white skin is in fact a disadvantage to those who have always lived near to the Equator. If you live near to the Equator black skin is better. Black skin protects from the sun’s ultraviolet rays, yet in the plentiful sunshine near to the equator enough Vitimin D is gained to permit healthy populations to survive and thrive. If you live in the far north white skin is biological better.
So there is nothing wrong with black skin.
And there is nothing wrong with white skin.
Please note that the Australian indigenous people who moved out of African at about the same time as other African people moved to Europe did not naturally select for white skin. Because in fact white skin is a distinct disadvantage in a country as sunny as Australia.
It is about Vitimin D and survival that’s all. Without an adequate supply of Vitimin D any human population will die out.
Why do you think that populations and individuals deprived of Vitimin D have high rates of both rickets and multiple sclerosis.
Young women who have untreated rickets or who have multiple sclerosis even now have difficulty bearing and rearing children. Imagine the difficulty 50,000 years ago.
Black skin is good.
White skin is good.
We are all literally children of the sun.
Without the sun we cannot survive.
Simple Simeon you are reading obsolete material.
speaking of skin color and skin cancer makes me dig deeper into the jjews of the bible who are said to have lived in a deserted land for hundreds of years, yet the more i think of that length and the elements involved the more it seems doubtful that the jews that are spoken of today with their pigmentation would have been able to survive for such a long period under such harsh environmental elements
i know the bible fanatics would say different but the logic of reality proves them wrong.
Pale-skin is no more adapted to cold, dark climates than it is to anywhere else.
Contrary to popular claims, pale skin is not an adaptation to lack of sunlight. If that were so, then the darkest places in West Asia (“Europe”), which have the world’s palest people, wouldn’t have the highest rates of skin cancer.
AC this is a response to your question.
Study of young Israelis emphasizes need for avoidance of sun exposure for the very young
A new study conducted using extensive medical records of over one million Israeli adolescents before military service shows clearly how exposure to the Israeli sun of young, light-skinned children increases substantially the risk of cutaneous melanoma (a serious form of skin cancer)….
In their study, the researchers found – not surprisingly – a quadrupled higher risk of skin cancer among native-born Israelis of European origin (including the Americas, Australia and South Africa) and those immigrating from those countries over those of North African or Asian origin.
Israel’s subtropical latitude means residents are exposed to more solar radiation than in much of Europe, and therefore the findings implicate childhood sun exposure as a clear, preventable risk factor for melanoma. But even for those who spent their childhood in Europe, the data showed that those who came to Israel before age 10 had almost double the risk of cutaneous melanoma compared to those who arrived from Europe later in childhood….
Levine, H. et al. Country of origin, age at migration and risk of cutaneous melanoma: A migrant cohort study of 1,100,000 Israeli men, International Journal of Cancer, 2013.
Provided by: Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Vitamin D Deficiency Might Be Overdiagnosed in Blacks, Study Suggests
Nov 20, 2013
By Amy Norton
HealthDay Reporter
WEDNESDAY, Nov. 20, 2013 (HealthDay News) — Black adults typically have low levels of vitamin D in their blood, but they are on par with whites when it comes to the “active” form of vitamin D used by the body’s cells, a new study finds.
Experts said the findings go a long way toward explaining a paradox: Blacks usually have fairly low vitamin D levels, but have greater bone mass than whites. Vitamin D is needed to maintain strong bones.
What’s more, the results suggest that doctors may be overdiagnosing vitamin D deficiency in black patients, said lead researcher Dr. Ravi Thadhani, chief of nephrology at Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston.
“We’re suggesting that the definition of vitamin D deficiency needs to be rethought,” said Thadhani, whose report appears in the Nov. 21 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
I wasn’t writing about a Vitimin D lab result. I was writing about the significantly higher rate of MS in black people who live in the cold white north as compared to black people who live in sunny Barbados.
Of course there is a higher rate of skin cancer in pale skinned European Jews who live in sunny Israel. For Eastern Jews the rate is of course lower.
Of course the European Jews who have lived in Europe for almost 2,000 years have long intermarried with the native Europeans and are themselves in appearance indistinguishable from native Europeans.
European Jews do not look any different from Europeans. If they looked so different Hitler would not have had to use a yellow star to identify Jews. In other words the European Jews are/were an INVISIBLE minority. They practice a different religion, that’s all.
@zimbab September 25, 2015 at 12:03 AM “Contrary to popular claims, pale skin is not an adaptation to lack of sunlight. If that were so, then the darkest places in West Asia (“Europe”), which have the world’s palest people, wouldn’t have the highest rates of skin cancer.”
Not true.
The highest rates of skin cancer occur in white people who live in sunny climes, such as Australia, South Africa, the far Southern United States and places like sunny Barbados.
@zibongo September 13, 2015 at 5:43 PM “Why did Europeans enslaved Africans ?”
Greed
Vitamin D production after UVB exposure depends on baseline vitamin D and total cholesterol but not on skin pigmentation.
Bogh MK, Schmedes AV, Philipsen PA, Thieden E, Wulf HC
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Feb.
According to this study, low total cholesterol seems to be associated with impaired ability to produce vitamin D from UVB radiation. And skin pigmentation appears to have little effect on the amount of vitamin D produced.
Simple Simon your views appear to be obsolete.
Date:
April 28, 2014
Skin cancer cases soar to over 10,000 in Ireland for the first time
Skin cancer cases in Ireland have now reached over 10,000 annually for the first time, according to the Irish Cancer Society who today launched their annual SunSmart campaign.
Simple Simon produce the evidence to support your claims.
Skin Cancer – The Problem.
Rates of skin cancer are increasing faster than any other cancer in the UK, with figures doubling every 10-20 years. More than 12,000 cases of Melanoma, the deadliest form of the disease are diagnosed every year in the UK and over 2,000 will die from the disease this year alone!
Skin Cancer – The Facts:
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the UK.
More people die from skin cancer in the UK than in Australia.
Melanoma, the most deadly skin cancer, is now one of the most common cancers in young adults aged 15-34 in the UK.
Over the last twenty-five years, rates of Melanoma in Britain have risen faster than any other common cancer.
Over 80% of all skin cancers are caused by over-exposure to the sun and/or sun beds
7 people currently die each day as a result of skin cancer in the UK!
Approximately 12,800 (35 people per day) were diagnosed with malignant melanoma in
2010 in the UK.
Sweden’s doctors concerned over high skin cancer rate in Sweden
Sun-worshipping Swedes top skin cancer league
Published fredag 25 maj 2012 .
Sun worshipping Sweden has the highest skin cancer rates in Europe.
Scandinavian countries have the highest number of skin cancer cases in all of Europe, despite having the most sun-deprived climates. Sweden leads the Nordic countries, with 45,000 people diagnosed with skin cancer each year. 500 die from the disease annually, in particular from melanoma, which is more than the yearly total of fatalities from road traffic accidents.
Simple Simon I await your response.
@zimbab September 25, 2015 at 10:11 AM “Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the UK. More people die from skin cancer in the UK than in Australia.”
Maybe because there are 64.5 million in the U.K and only 24 million, so of course there are more cases of skin cancer in the U.K because the U.K has almost 3 times as many people as does Australia. But the question is what is the rate of skin cancer? That is how many incidences and how many deaths per 100,000 people?
@zimbab September 25, 2015 at 10:03 AM “Simple Simon produce the evidence to support your claims. Simple Simon I await your response.”
World Health Organization
http://www.who.int/uv/faq/skincancer/en/index2.html
Who is most at risk of getting skin cancer?
Due to their relative lack of skin pigmentation Caucasian populations generally have a much higher risk of getting non-melanoma or melanoma skin cancers than dark-skinned populations. Naturally brown and black people (skin types V, VI – see table) can usually safely tolerate relatively high levels of sun exposure without getting sunburnt or greatly increasing their skin cancer risk. In contrast, people with pale or freckled skin, fair or red hair and blue eyes belong to the highest risk group (skin types I, II); people with dark hair and eyes who do not normally get sunburnt are at medium risk of developing skin cancer (skin types III, IV). Nevertheless excessive exposure to intense sunlight can damage all skin types – the risk of eye damage and heat stroke is the same for everyone!
http://www.cancer.org/cancer/skincancer-melanoma/detailedguide/melanoma-skin-cancer-key-statistics
American Cancer Society
“Melanoma is more than 20 times more common in whites than in African Americans. Overall, the lifetime risk of getting melanoma is about 2.4% (1 in 40) for whites, 0.1% (1 in 1,000) for blacks, and 0.5% (1 in 200) for Hispanics. The risk for each person can be affected by a number of different factors, which are described in the section.”
White skin has no advantage .
Except since 1492 people erroneously believed that white skin was better. And acted on this belief to create advantages for those who have/had white skin and disadvantages for those who did not have/do not have white skin.
So after 500 years of this we have white privilege.
The risk of high UV exposure is real on any part of the globe & during any season of the year.Therefore white skin has no advantage on the planet.
Epidemiological studies have shown skiers to be at increased risk for the development of squamous cell carcinoma and indirectly at possible increased risk of melanoma.
Alpine Skiers Risk Skin Cancer
WebMD Health News
Jan. 29, 2003 — Skiers hitting the slopes may soak up as many dangerous ultraviolet (UV) rays as sun worshippers hitting the beach. A new study shows spending a winter’s day at a Colorado ski resort may be just as damaging to your skin as a summer’s day spent lounging poolside in Florida.
With up to 90% of all skin cancers caused by overexposure to UV radiation winter sports enthusiasts are at an increased risk of sun induced skin damage and potentially skin cancer.
snow can reflect the sun’s UV rays by up to 80%, this combined with a higher altitude can make winter sun every bit as damaging on the slopes as it is on the beach!
Exposure to UV radiation increases 4 to 5 per cent with every 1000 feet above sea level, so the higher the altitude – the stronger the UV penetration.
Even on cloudy days, winter sports enthusiasts are at greater risk of skin damage – this is because up to 80 per cent of the sun’s harmful UV rays can penetrate cloud cover…
This compelling fact combined with the increased level of UV that is reflected off the snow (up to 80 per cent) seriously increases a persons exposure to UV and potential skin damage.
Caucasians= Albinos from Central Asia.
By their own science the Albinos (Caucasians) knew that all Modern Humans were of African origin, and thus “Black Skinned”, so they attempted to explain away their “White Skin” by saying that they “Gradually” turned White in Europe, in order to better absorb the weak Sunlight in Europe, and thus aid their bodies production of Vitamin D. The problem with this lie, is that all through Human time in Europe, there are artifacts of Black Africans who retained ALL of their African features and color throughout history. Not only that, their own studies have confirmed that Blacks absorb UV rays better, and produce and store Vitamin D more effectively than Albinos: WITHOUT DAMAGE TO THE SKIN, (gullible Negroes beware of the nonsense that these people tell you). One of the many functions of Vitamin D, is to control the Calcium content of our bones: Blacks EVERYWHERE in the world, have “Bone Density” of 20% greater than Albinos – thus their lies are debunked by common knowledge. Plus our instinctive understanding of how Humans evolve, tells us that nature does not create deficiencies: Many European Albinos can barely tolerated a hour in the Sun before Sunburn sets in: Nature did not create that, the disease of Albinism did.
Realhistorywww.
@ Simple Simon September 21, 2015 at 11:32 PM #
“We are all literally children of the sun.
Without the sun we cannot survive.”
My “God”, never thought you were that deep!
Without the SUN there is no Earth.
The Sun is mankind’s God. His source of Light and Life. That is why all cultures, all religions revolve around the worship of the Sun. Next time you see a depiction of your sweet white Jesus look behind him and you will see the Light (halo). Christians are just “refined” Sun worshippers.
Sol Invictus anthropomorphically modified for a Roman world.
Zoe and Bushie, where ‘art’ thou?
Seems like Caricom’s Overtures for Reparations last year was ignored by UK and has gone quiet on the next move to file a case
African Freedom, Corn Picker Dub
https://youtu.be/xKAkpD-3ZjI
The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.