Submitted by David Comissiong, President, Clement Payne Movement
David Comissiong - President of Clement Payne Movement
David Comissiong – President of Clement Payne Movement

As we approach Barbados’ 50th year of Independence, I am calling on all patriotic Barbadians to join together and make a determined effort to uproot and eradicate the destructive remnants […] of the “Old Colonial System” that still exist in our supposedly independent nation.

And one particularly odious remnant is that aspect of the “Old Colonial System” that traditionally permitted the social and business elite of Barbados to have compliant members of the political directorate grant them outrageously preferential business and commercial arrangements that allowed them to feed on the substance of the Barbadian State and on the mass of predominantly black labourers, consumers, and – in more recent times- taxpayers!

Just take a cursory look at Barbados’ history and you will see exactly what I mean. From the earliest colonial days, the planter/merchant elite utilized a compliant House of Assembly to, inter alia:- supply themselves with cheap labour by legislating the enslavement of Blacks; grant themselves legal title to the lands they had occupied; give themselves a commercial advantage by prohibiting free Blacks and Coloureds from being able to give evidence in Court against them; control Black labour by enacting a Post- Emancipation “Masters and Servants Act“; prohibit the migration of Black labourers from Barbados; transfer the burden of falling international sugar prices unto the backs of the large black labouring class; use legislation and the Court system to ensure that the lands of bankrupt plantations did not fall into the hands of Blacks; use grant money from the British Government exclusively for the elite sugar planter class; and the list goes on and on.

In more recent “Independence times”, this old colonial phenomenon has been manifesting itself in the practice of predominantly black Parliamentarians and Ministers of Government granting amazingly preferential taxpayer- funded or guaranteed contracts to elite white Barbadian and foreign business-people – contracts that they would never dream of conferring upon black Barbadian business-people!

One such contract is the so-called “Take or Pay Contract” that the current Democratic Labour Party (DLP) administration granted to Mr Bizzy Williams’ Sustainable (Barbados) Recycling Centre Inc (SBRC) in June 2009. Under that contract, we, the taxpayers of Barbados, are obliged to underwrite a guaranteed minimum payment of $22.6 Million per year over a 20 year period to SBRC for the processing or managing of so-called municipal solid waste, whether or not the company is actually called upon to carry out work of the requisite minimum quantity! Thus, under this contract alone, we taxpayers are saddled with a minimum payment of $45 Million over the 20 year period.

Another such contract is the April 2013 so-called storage tank lease contract entered into by our Government with the Mark Maloney and Bjorn Bjerkham owned and/or managed company known as Storage Solutions Limited – company number 36264 in the register of companies at the Corporate Affairs and Intellectual Property Office situate at Baobab Tower, Warrens, St Michael!

Under this contract, our Government-owned (and taxpayer-funded) Barbados Agricultural Management Co. Ltd (BAMC) is obligated to pay Storage Solutions Limited the sum of $2,150,000.00 plus VAT every year for 20 years for the privilege of using three molasses storage tanks at the Bridgetown Port. Thus, under this contract, our Government ( and ultimately the taxpayers of Barbados) are saddled with a payment of some $50 Million over the 20 year period!

Yet another such contract is the so-called housing construction contract entered into between this current DLP administration and the corporate entity known as Housing Concepts SRL – also owned and/or managed by the said Mark Maloney and Bjorn Bjerkham.

Under this contract, Housing Concepts SRL was leased a massive parcel of Government land at Coverley, Christ Church at a pepper-corn rent for the purpose of constructing houses for sale to the Barbadian people at prices ranging between $289,000.00 and $ 396,000.00!

But what makes this contract truly remarkable is that our taxpayer-funded Government has entered into a legally binding contractual obligation to purchase from Housing Concepts SRL any house that the company is unable to sell to members of the public! Thus, once again, we taxpayers are left holding the bag!

And -truth be told- I could go on and on detailing similarly outrageously preferential contracts that our compliant political directorate has conferred on a small group of elite white Barbadian business-people. It is no wonder therefore that our country now possesses a national debt that is virtually as large as our entire Gross National Product!

I wish to conclude, however, with one example of a similarly outrageously privileged government contract that has been conferred upon a foreign company incorporated in one of the Channel Islands off the coast of England – the so-called “Waste To Energy” contract that has been granted to Cahill Energy Limited and its subsidiary Cahill Energy Barbados Limited.

We Barbadians should really thank Opposition Leader Mia Mottley for exposing the alarming details of this old colonial-type contractual arrangement. Subsequent to Ms Mottley’s revelations I was able to read the 37 page document put out by Cahill Energy and Jacob Securities Inc about the project, and discovered that our Government has committed itself to do the following:-

(1) purchase 15 acres of land at Vaucluse and “donate” it to Cahill free of cost;

(2) purchase any additional land that Cahill will require for drilling wells and creating a lagoon, and “donate” said land to Cahill free of cost;

(3) supply the pipelines and other water infrastructure to the Cahill plant free of cost to Cahill;

(4) pay for the cost of integrating Cahill’s plant into the electricity grid and into the public water supply system;

(5) waive all taxes and tariffs on Cahill’s imports, exports, income, profits, dividends and transfers of shares;

(6) provide guaranteed taxpayer- funded payments to Cahill for the processing of waste over a 30 year period;

(7) provide guaranteed taxpayer -funded payments to Cahill for the purchase of electricity over a 30 year period; and

(8) provide Cahill with guaranteed taxpayer funded payments totaling close to $2.5 Billion over a 30 year period.

Fellow Barbadians, this is not right! The “Old Colonial System” continues to choke us and to subvert the positive advances we have made as a nation over the past 49 years!

The purpose of this article is to expose the continued existence of these aspects of the “Old Colonial System” and to urge all well meaning and patriotic Barbadians – of all races, classes and creeds – to demand their total abolition. Let us all operate on a level playing field, and let the public purse not be treated as anybody’s cash-cow!

68 responses to “Outrageous Government Contracts Are Choking Barbados!”


  1. @Bushie—

    You think that anyone is impressed because you happened to play with your black neighbours when you were young? …shiite man! … the very fact that you think this is significant speaks volumes. end

    So there is absolutely no difference between a White kid who spent most of his first 18 yrs interacting with black kids and the white child who virtually never interacted as such???

    Bushie you obviously have not studied Psychology, Sociology or an abundance of other Social Sciences! For a gent that sometimes makes sense this is now a new low in comprehension! Obviously it makes a VAST DIFFERENCE!

    You appreciate that ALL humans go through God’s Body Shop and none a we are asked to choose what colour skin we want!!!

    Bushie you mussseee know very well that is TOTAL IGNORANCE to keep blaming Whitey like they ALL cut from the same cloth.

    Suggesting one second that Whites all greedy for money but Blacks are not and then crying that there are not enough rich blacks. This attitude is either hypocricy or self contradiction, you choose. I have reminded you countless times that $$$$$$ dont have no race, most people want to be rich.(my grandfather had no interest in $$$$ only God)


  2. Domps—

    Have not seen RR or Baffy pun here for a long while.

  3. De Ingrunt Word Avatar
    De Ingrunt Word

    MB, realistically no black person on BU or Bdos believes that white people have any greater inherent desire for money than blacks do. As you state such a concept would have to be either hypocricy or self contradiction”. It is all about the narrative that makes the best headline.

    Bushie is very astute, he noted explicitly: “you would know that these ‘businessmen’ …Who the hell you think came up with the DESAL proposal? … with 3S? …conceived of the concrete molasses tank?”

    What was clearly implicit in that statement is that the black politician want nuff money too so they agree to ALL the money making schemes from the white business men as long as their % is assured.

    Bushie also said, “You play you ain’t know that every weekend your people does retire to Cattlewash … to plot …and to concoct their scams…”.

    What he didn’t say but what is known is that the black fellas also got their villas and beach houses now too. That they use proceeds from those gov’t project big $700K fees to pay for the $25K+ memberships at the top golf clubs where they relax away from the maddening crowd on weekends too.

    He didn’t say explicitly but we all know that those black fellows don’t give a shiiiite about Dompey’s mum or my peoples and many like them because now they are drinking and cavorting with your people and feel good!

    But he knows and he implied all that with all that he didn’t say.

    So we come back to the fundamental: blatant corruption and malfeasance. The desire for money is colour blind.

    The skin colour narrative makes for a vibrant debate for those who need that straw to stir their drink but if we are serious about the matter of change and integrity legislation then we only see crooks!

    Let’s me be clear, race will always be relevant and real in our lives. But on this issue it is ABSOLUTELY, COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY IRRELEVANT.


  4. @De Ingrunt–

    Excellent, realistic assessment.

    Honestly, I dont claim to know the details of these “Projects”.


  5. @ Money Brain @ Dompey,

    Off message

    Take a look at the link below.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/29/black-people-south-african-novelist


  6. @Exclaimer—

    This woman is a typical bigot who does not appreciate that she has never had Black friends and so she has accepted negative perceptions, which in Sth Africa due to Apartheid and its resulting “anti” activities is surely common. If one does not give people of other races a chance to prove their positive attributes, treat them as prospective friends, judge them as humans, without seeing just skin pigmentation this is what results. Having said that in Bim and SA, maids and nannies were in some cases regarded as part of the family.( My sister and brother had the same maids for over 40 yrs, and they are like family members in that there children and grands are afforded food, clothes, school books and career/ job recommendations—one youngster is now a Chtd Acct.)

    She could be in for a major shock in Britian when she is out walking and some white Yob lashes her and steals her handbag. When I left Bim to study in the UK obviously most street crime etc was associated with dark skin in Bim, however I quickly realised that in the UK it was different. My Aussie friend was attacked by White Chelsea hooligans one Sat night and beaten senseless, nose totally broken—-he had no clue why, hadnt said a word.


  7. @ Bush Tea July 8, 2015 at 3:37 PM
    You forgot to mention that these folk also meet at Consett Bay on Sunday evenings. If you doubt me, ask David Estwick.


  8. MoneyBrain July 8, 2015 at 7:49 AM #
    And there are instances where some of us , initiate the prejudice in our minds. Take for instance I was sent to a place along with some 100 others who were all white. The locals, white as well , cuss these men stink calling them all kinds of names. When I arrived the cussing crowd was there, and as the only black person, I was expecting a double dose of cussing and insulting, It never came, perhaps next day.
    Next day,and for the entire time I was there , I was given royal treatment by the same locals.


  9. @Col Buggy

    All too often we delude ourselves, see conspiracies against us where there are’nt any etc etc. We owe it to ourselves to relax, look for the good in others, expect to be treated well but be prepared to deal with negative situations if/when those arrive.


  10. @ Money B
    We owe it to ourselves to relax, look for the good in others, expect to be treated well but be prepared to deal with negative situations if/when those arrive.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    A logical position to be taken by a white Bajan….perhaps by an Indian… lately by a Trickidadian….
    …but for Black Bajans to take that position is to guaranteed a continuation of the last 400 years of history.

    But of course you have no problem with the last 400 years …do you?


  11. @Bushie–

    Firstly, I did know that Bajans are long lived as my former classmate’s Grandfather lived to 113 and my granny to 103 BUT to my knowledge no on has been extant for 400yrs.

    Interesting that most successful Black Bajans follow the general principles outlined and strive to better themselves.

    The fact is that the vast majority of Whites (and other progressive peeps) left Jamaica and Guyana long time now and WHAT GOOD did that do to the average or poor from those 2 Nations???????????? Forbes and Mikey tried the useless strategy of impoverishing everyone to induce a Sociaistl reset to ZERO!

    Even the well educated who are still there live in fear and some have complained that they can not even go to a good restaurant without some Druglord with possee in tow messing with the anticipated serenity.

    I have major problems with today, the last 400 yrs and much of history eg the dominance of the Church of Rome and its retardation of science, encouraging people to be poor as in God will provide, its contributing to Slavery etc. There could be an endless list if I put my mind to that task BUT I prefer to solve my concerns of today.

    Over emphasising and dwelling on history will not help. Mt mother was a poor orphan and had a rich aunt who supposedly left $$$ for her care which she never benefitted from so what should I do wait for that money that is 85 years overdue?????


  12. @Moneybrain, Bushie, Dompey, and even David,
    Buy and read my book “The Royal Palms are Dying”. No sense bashing each other over irrelevancies because the era of MoneyBags is gone forever. Commissiong made a number of errors; and should answer some questions,
    Under whose administration was he head of the PanAfrican Commission?When he was in that position what was his approach to solve the behaviour that he saw as infelicities? Did he expose any of it? If Williams got the contract in 2009, When was the bid put out to Tender? What were the terms and conditions of the Tender? Who comprises the Tender Committee? How does the process work? Why doesn’t he educate those who do not know the process, instead of innuendo and leaving people to guess the details and come to the wrong conclusions?
    You see folks, there are often simple answers to these questions, but when things are left hanging ignorance then results in the wrong conclusions being drawn. Has Commissiong shown how many BLACK BUSINESSES ACTUALLY SUBMIT TENDERS FOR PROJECTS? WHY IS THERE A TENDERS COMMITTEE?
    (Sorry David, pressed the Caps lock by mistake).

    Money Brain, have you ever heard of the Ladies’ Lyceum Club? Ask your mother or one of her older friends and come back and enlighten me. I know the answer, but I want YOU to find out and let me (us) know and I will tell you a little story.


  13. @Alvin C–
    I had never heard of this club before. The club was apparently for the Advancement of females and education. My mother was a member of the Self Help and Mother’s Union and was very good at making Hot Sauce, Jams, Stewed Guava etc. Indeed, we paid our Dr with a giant bottle of Hot Sauce, you would remember those Treblor Sweets bottles.


  14. @Money Brain,
    The Ladies Lyceum Club, was an elite club formed by the wives of plantation owners. It was a place; in Bolton Lane,the exit from woolworth faces the building (upstairs Madamozelves), opposite C.B.Rice, tailoring establishment, where they could come and relax while their husbands conducted business and relaxed at the Bridgetown Club. My mother worked there as a maid, so I got to know all the plantation owners: Josh Haynes, Edghill, Pile, etc. Even though I was very young, I got to understand the thinking of these plantation owners. Some were not so nice, and the sugar industry was designed in a way that profited them and the owners(some in England) and managers. The ordinary workers had to remain ordinary, barefooted and penniless. That was the Barbados pre-independence. It was the time of the Segregated Royal Barbados Yacht Club, and the Marine House, and the Rocks, where the Police Band played inside the wooden fence that kept the Blacks on the outside. That was segregation and discrimination.

    These fences are still there to some extent, but other fences were constructed in other ways. Concessions; such as those referred to in some of these blogs, have been allowed under special legislation created to encourage investment. One such example is the legislation that referred to Special Development Areas; The Special Development Areas Act, that allowed concessions for investors, developers, and persons wishing to live in these areas. Does Cahill fall within one of these special development areas? Needs checking, before complaints are made, and discrimination argued.


  15. @Alvin C—-

    Sounds like the old Barbados to me, racial and segregated. However, what many forget is that poorer whites were not treated much better–they were not welcome at the Yacht Club, Aquatic Club etc. My father left Combemere at 13 to go to work to help feed his younger siblings and my mother was an orphan (she did have a very rich Aunt who was supposed to leave her $$$$ but those $$$ went “missing”——you know the thinking these young children will misuse the $$$$, I know what to do with it. Those old bastards did not care about white family in need, far less anyone else.

    When my father eventually made his $$$ he refused to join any of those Clubs, he never liked most of the members. Besides those Club types dislike people who actually made the $$$$$ themselves they prefer $$ by inheritance and marriage. Self made people make them look bad! I know the children of some of these “elite” types and they are not too clever. Indeed, some such families had to hire top flight help in order to prevent bankruptcy.


  16. @ Alvin Cummins

    You have to forgive me, Mr. Cummins, although I was still attending secondary school in 1982 and cannot be considered a “young person,” I don’t know anything about the “Ladies Lyceum Club” or the discrimination experienced by Black Barbadians at the Yacht Club.

    But, could you please explain to me what does discrimination, the Yacht Club, Ladies Lyceum Club and the Special Development Areas Act have to do with CAHILL?

    I asked you this question against the background that many of us would agree, although “concessions have been allowed under special legislation created to encourage investment,” does it mean Barbadians should accept any and everyone who proposes to investment in Barbados and grant them concessions, without due diligence, “contractual transparency” and asking them and government to address our concerns?

    You must be cognizant of the fact that Barbadians elect politicians, after soliciting our votes, to SERVE our best interests and that of Barbados.

    So, are you suggesting, because a politician from a party you love and support, suggests the country should embark upon undertaking a project in which there is seemingly a lack of transparency, we should accept it, without asking for clarifications?

    You are also aware that many of us took advantage of the educational opportunities available to us, to gain tertiary level and professional qualifications. Although I may not possess a superior intellectual capacity similar to yours, I think I have the ability to “reason” for myself.

    Judging from your arguments about this CAHILL issue, you are basically suggesting, the WTE plant is good for the country (which many of us agree with), but we should not be overly concerned about the reputation of the investors and facilitators, since laws and concessions are in place to attract investors.
    Also, since, in YOUR opinion, people did not have a problem with issues of full disclosure and transparency as it relates to projects undertaken by the former BLP administration, they should REMAIN SILENT on CAHILL, because anything they say or do, will be interpreted as being “anti-DLP.”

    When I take your statements re: “The ordinary workers had to remain ordinary, barefooted and penniless…” and “That was segregation and discrimination…”, into consideration and juxtapose them with what is presently unfolding with this CAHILL issue, I don’t really see any difference. Just as you mentioned the “white peel” had the “Black peel” in that era under subjection, the Black politicians of this era seem to be doing even worse to us.

    I also found your comment “the sugar industry was designed in a way that profited them” rather interesting and amusing, because the political system has also been designed in a way that (will profit the politician).

    They can benefit from pension after 2 terms; similar to how the whites in that era appointed friends as managers and bookkeepers, politicians appoint friends, supporters and financiers as chairmen and CEO of statutory/quasi government entities and appoint losing candidates as parliamentary secretaries and senators.

    Similar to how whites were allowed to work until when “duh feel like dunning” and send home labourers “willy nilly” saying it is in the interest of business, politicians can contests seats past 60 years of age, extend contracts to their friends who are over 60 and forcibly retired workers at 60 or retrench them, while citing “interest of the country.”

    Yet you, Mr. Cummins, seem quite satisfied with, and willing to accept these activities, which have been perpetrated by BOTH BLP and DLP. And because you love the DLP more, makes what ever that party does CORRECT and UNQUESTIONABLE.

    Now, that my friend, is what HARROWS ME WITH FEAR AND WONDER.


  17. @Artra…,

    Dear Artra…,

    “Let not your heart be troubled”. What I say (or write) should not bother you or “fill you with fear and wonder’ just as I am not filled with fear and worry by Your utterances. You have your likes (BLP) and I have My likes (DLP) and we should both reach the point where we can agree to disagree. Now to the substantive discussion; your reply to my blog.

    I never intended that Cahill be mixed with Anything. My comments on the Ladies Lyceum Club, were really in response to the direction the discussion with Money Brain’s contribution, and those of Dompey was going; that is the era of discrimination and segregation in. If you were still at secondary school in 1982 you would haVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA OF THE TYPE OF SOCIETY WE HAD PRE 1966. MY INTENTION WAS TO DESCRIBE THESE CONDITIONS FOR THE EDIFICATION OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU. When I spoke about people being barefoot, and penniless, that is what it was like. Many,many children went to school without shoes etc. The plantocracy kept us so. Little or no money as wages. I left Combermere in 1951 and worked as an apprentice electrician, Wages sixty cents per week; after three weeks for nothing. When I left there after a year; to work in the civil service, my wages were eleven shillings a week (i shilling was 24 cents). My salary as a clerk on probation (two years) was thirty dollars a month with a cost of living bonus of nine dollars and sixty cents. We were only entitled to a raise every four years when the commissioner came down from England and determined the amount of the raise.Those were the conditions at that time.

    The Special Development areas act specified that persons who wanted to invest etc. in these areas were exempt from tax concession;, customs and excise taxes on certain items, property transfer taxes, income tax concessions etc. I had copies of the act, but I don’t have it with me at the moment, or I could be more specific. The facts are that this legislation was brought into, and took effect by the BLP during its first period of governing after the defeat of the Erskine Sandiford government. The BLP, at any time during their fifteen years could have amended, repealed or changed the act or any part of it if they so desired. It is an act of Parliament and the only ones who can change it is parliament itself.

    I DO NOT KNOW WHETHER SBRC QUALIFIED FOR ANY OF THESE CONCESSIONS. IF IT DOES, BECAUSE IT FALLS WITHIN THE UMBRELLA OF THE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS ACT, THEN IT SHOULD FOLLOW THAT A WASTE TO ENERGY PLANT IN THE SAME AREA WOULD ALSO QUALIFY. ALL MY ARGUMENTS WERE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WASTE TO ENERGY PLANT; PREFERABLY A PLASMA-GAS PLANT. I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT CAHILL APART FROM WHAT I HAVE READ. I, however have no evidence, about any malfeasance on the part of Cahill. You may be in a better position than me to know. If you do direct me to the relevant court cases and conclusions.Failing which, by law they are entitled to the same as SBRC or any other entity in the same ares.

    Your comment regarding the decision to “send home” people when they reach 60 again misses the point. The legislation pertaining to this was also brought in by the BLP government. The Board of Directors of the BIDC, facing financial problems, applied the regulation that they felt would ease their situation. The courts will decide whether they had the authority to do it. So we have to wait on that decision before we pass final judgement.

    The political system as you say was designed to give politicians a pension after two terms. That may be true, but if the employer (the people) decide to terminate the employment of the employee (the politician) after one term (five years) he can’t go to court and demand his job back, on the grounds of wrongful dismissal. He/she was weighed in the balance and found wanting. No Pension!! No gratuity. Nothing.

    Now, people can protest and march. In the old days when the plantation owner, or the CEO of BS&T, or Goddard’s or any of the white owned businesses said that Mr. X should get this trucking contract or build that house, that was it. There was no recourse to anything. Things are different now, although THE PERCE{TION, still persists that this is what the BLACK politicians do or can do. It is not so in reality; although some cases may drop out of the safety net. But in the main it does not happen so, and this has nothing to do with party.

    One thing people, like you, seem to forget, or ignore, is that NO ONE is guaranteed a seat in a free and fair election. It depends on his persuasive powers, what he has done for his constituents, how he has performed in parliament, and the voters’ perception of whether or not he deserves to be re-elected. Otherwise he may be elected only once, so his job may only last four or five years; after which he has to look to pay off his election expenses, without the benefit of a job. A very daunting proposition, don’t you think?


  18. @Artra,
    By the way;
    The king’s beach fiasco was private wasn’t it? And the perpetrator was white wasn’t he? Have they ever found him?

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading