Submitted by Beresford
Click to review Draft Estimates 2104-2015

Click to review Draft Estimates 2104-2015

This Friday will be a watershed for Barbados.

The vote on the Estimates will determine whether hypocrisy will continue to subvert conscience and the DLP Government renews its hijacking of the economy and lives of Barbadians, or there will be a summoning of integrity, national and social responsibility in support of the proof of what the BLP has said about the economy – that the DLP is unfit to rectify the massacre of the country’s fundamentals – supported by no less than senior Cabinet Minister David Estwick.

It is clear from the Estimates that, regardless of the last ditch statement from the usually rambunctious Ronald Jones which merely served to reinforce the efficacy of Estwick’s stance, that the DLP has steadfastly ignored Estwick’s prosecution of its economic policies as complete failures.

The only dignified path left for Estwick, who up to the time of writing, has not spoken in the Estimates, is to have the courage of his convictions and stand for his principles in the full knowledge that truth is his amour and, when called to do his duty, he rightly put country before party or self.

It is also evident from the vicious personal attacks and nasty slurs on one hand, and the excursions into everything from self-taught historic diatribes and creepy sermonising, in a surreal performance that reinforces a dogged detachment from the realities of Barbados and is mind-boggling in its tenacity, the DLP Government is exultant to be adrift and has absolutely no intention of changing course.

Sinckler often contradicts himself; he has also managed the art of eating his own words. The DLP, he being one of the quad poster images of prominent incompetence, persists, in Sinckler’s words, in drinking their own muddy coffee.

Instead of the Sinckler bringing to the country a set of Estimates grown out of a strategy to turn the raging tide of mushrooming debt – 60 cents out of every dollar – that is suffocating Barbados; instead of deliberate constructs to demonstrate an understanding that the productive sectors must be stimulated; instead of retooling of programmes indicated by money allocations to incentivise momentum for future growth, Sinckler delivered the usual slash and burn, mish-mash shrouded in incoherent meanderings for two hours with no connection to what is needed in the dire circumstances now.

Trotting out this and that project that will not impact for any time to come does not change the harsh daily grind of Barbadians. People being sent home, taxi-men fighting over a trip, a hospital in shambles, empty towns, banks without customers – no amount of spin can change the unraveling of Barbados.

Again, in his own, words, the facts do not lie. The stats do not lie – not that he would be any wiser given his history at the UWI, reputation for scrupulous misstatements and non-performance as Minister of Finance.

The facts of the economy are known – no need to repeat. So where is the money coming from .. to do anything? Build the new police stations of Adriel’s Brathwaite’s imagination? Where is the logic in persisting with a programme in Brazil which in the course of a whole year only delivered 134 people to Barbados? What kind of self-indulgent Minister of Tourism would allocate the same $2 million to the UK market, our biggest, as to Brazil? The appalling lack of appreciation of the realities of Barbados by the DLP knows no bounds.

Sinckler’s attempt to be contrite could not withstand the flood of his natural venom. Faced with a clinical and comprehensive rebuttal by BLP leader Mia Mottley, displaying all the knowledge and experience of 20 years odd in Parliament and Government and exposing Sinckler’s shortcomings, the 2014 Estimates degenerated as expected into a full-scale personal attack and rehashing of history.

Isn’t it amazing how those who like to accuse are themselves guilty as they protest innocence?

His disposition and ego, and that of those who invariably follow him like the Pied Piper of Hamelin, would have been even more wounded by the series of speeches from the BLP, which cut to the heart of Government’s destructiveness and irrelevance.

The dissection of tourism by Santia Bradshaw and tour de force by Ronald Toppin; the calling out of the DLP on its victimisation in its hacking of public servants by Dwight Sutherland; Dale Marshall’s barb on how a serious Government could ignore the Scotland District, one-sixth of the land mass of Barbados; Bostic’s steadied reasoning; Edmund Hinkson’s conviction of the DLP in forsaking education as the base when other countries are ramping up; Owen Arthur’s class-by-itself lesson on what is required and that the Estimates will not help – all of these and the rest obliterated the facade of normalcy in the face of economic terrorism that Sinckler, the likes of Michael Lashley, who did not seem to remember the consultants like Jepter Ince and even the now Minister, Dennis Lowe, at Transport Board, and Sealy would wish to conjure.

Poor Freundel is totally out of it. In the face of a mountain of irrefutable evidence in every form of media that he was the cheerleader that not a fellow would be cut loose from the public service, Freundel in his confused and comatose state still maintains he never said so.

Lowe, whose newfound religious fervor reminds one of the saying close to God and far from heaven, matched Sinckler’s vitriol. His new-found Christianity did not extend to charitable discourse but extended to indignant protestations like Peter in the final hours of Christ’s life on earth. He should do himself and his party a favour and turn his self-promoted diagnostic powers  to the particular form of political schizophrenia that is a permanent affliction of the DLP.

A year after elections, the Estimates debate turned into a blood sport by Sinckler and co. proved that the DLP in still in a bog weighted down by historic baggage; obsessed with the past, not an eye on the present and blind to the future.  When not trying to invoke times of Barrow nostalgia – long past and irrelevant – in an attempt at legitimacy by association, from leader down or, as most of them would say, up, indulge in a mindless blame game, conveniently ignoring their own recidivism in six years.

The public does not care, DLP. The demagoguery and inflammatory rants do not appeal or recommend either that you are serious or worthy.

What Barbadians care about are their livelihoods and lives. They worry about the chronic liabilities of Freundel, Sinckler and Sealy, in particular, in the womb of the reincarnation of Rudolf Havenstein in Barbados at the Central Bank.

Cursing Mia Mottley and the rest of team BLP does not cure the bronchitis of Barbados. Sinckler’s indulgence in poisonous irrelevance does not change the fact that he is not fit to run a bread shop and will not change his place in history as the man who charted the course of catastrophe for Barbados.

The DLP should be inspired by the cleaned up Constitution River to remove the mud from their surroundings, come out of the discoloured party water clouding their vision, leave out the razzmatazz they cannot help indulging in and clean up their literal act.

Today will signal whether there will be sober reflection, introspection driven by something other than remaining in power, and someone, somewhere in the DLP will stand for Barbados rather than keep on railing against their leader and the Government’s performance in cloak and dagger fashion in the dark while grandstanding on the floor of the House that all is well. When they all know it is not.

———————————————————————————

lionel_craigThe Barbados Labour Party is saddened at the passing of Hon. Lionel Seymour Craig CHB., J.P, who was a loyal longstanding member of the BLP.  He served as a Member of Parliament 1966-1986 representing St. James and was a member of Cabinet from 1976-1986.

His funeral will take place on Saturday March 22, 2014, 10.00 a.m at the St. Patrick’s Roman Catholic Cathedral, Jemmotts Lane, St. Michael.  Relatives and friends may pay their last respects at the Barbados Labour Party Headquarters on Friday March 21, 2014 from 4.00 p.m – 6.00 p.m.

The Leader of the Opposition Hon. Mia Amor Mottley conveys deepest sympathies on behalf of the Parliamentary Group, the National Council, members, supporters and friends of the BLP to his wife Tracy, daughter , son and other members of the family.

May He Rest in Peace

HAPPENING THIS WEEKEND

v The Christ Church West Central branch invites you to a meeting this Sunday March 23, 2014, 4.30 p.m at Foundation School, Christ Church.  Speakers will be the Rt. Hon Owen S Arthur; Indar Weir; and Wilfred Abrahams.  The meeting will be chaired by Akil Daley.

UPCOMING EVENTS

<

p align=”justify”>v The 76th Anniversary Service of the BLP will be held on Sunday March 30, 2014, 9.00 a.m at Power In The Blood Assembly, Kew Road, Tudor Bridge, St. Michael.

68 responses to “DLP as Clear as Mud”


  1. That is true David but the bigger story is that it didn’t suit OSA and his plans to vote against the Estimates. This is a sure sign and MAM would be well advised not to ignore.


  2. @Clone | March 22, 2014 at 3:09 PM

    I am not disappointed in Estwick. If you go back to the thread on Estwick a few weeks ago, you will see that I said that he will tow the party line and that the DLP is paramount for these Dems.

    Yes I am disappointed that OSA did not show up for the vote. I do not know what’s in his head since February 2013. However, I am of the view that past PM’s will always find it difficult after losing power and being head honcho for so long will always find it hard to submit to another leader and I think that is where he has his challenges. Are we not saying these days that men do not like to let go?

    He did not vote, so what? In the end, it did not matter! For the good of the country, the estimates had to be passed!


  3. “Let Estwick tow the party line. He will go down in history as the man who could have saved Barbados but refused to take a stand when it really mattered.”

    Prodigal Estwick will go down in history as the biggest eunuch in Barbadian history. He was a man before he got into politics and a deballed human being when he leaves. His was the castration of the century.


  4. @David
    Who thinks MAM attracts unrelenting criticism because she is a woman?
    ++++++++++
    Nothing new
    See Julia Gillard then Aussie PM confronting Tony Abbot the now PM

  5. millertheanunnaki Avatar
    millertheanunnaki

    @ Vacant | March 22, 2014 at 6:14 PM

    Which Opposition party in its right frame of mind would want to take over from the current administration given the comatose state of the country’s fiscal position and dire prognoses for the economy as perceived by the IMF and credit rating agencies?

    The Opposition should see themselves as knights in shining armour after the full slate of layoffs, the implementation of the upcoming programme of privatization and the much needed currency peg adjustment to bring your fellow countrymen back from a dream state into the real world of producing for your daily bread.

    No one owes modern “well-educated” Barbadians a living (not even the British for reparations) and the quicker you guys get to appreciate that, as the Jamaicans have, the better it would be for your survival.

    The state of your former productive agricultural fields once likened by the National Geographic to the English countryside is ample testimony to the productive degeneration (pardon the oxymoron) which is so much on the skids that its importance was not even able to attract the slightest discussion in the recently concluded Estimates debates.

    The current administration must pay for its sins of lies, deceit and mismanagement of the public finances before it is democratically removed from office by the wishes of the people which it has so violently wronged.
    The Young Democrats will soon have to change their name to the “Aging Democrats” as they wait in vain to take over from the present crop of idiots. Maybe Prince Charlie instead of Prince Edward can tell them a bit or two about being the King in waiting.


  6. “It must not be forgotten: when PM Barrow regained power in 1986, he made it one of his top priorities to rid the government of those top of the line Mercedes,”

    I wouldn’t venture to call your erroneous statement a lie because I really believe you are just mistaken.


  7. “dompey | March 22, 2014 at 6:21 AM |
    It is excruciatingly laughable how from time time David and his troop of advisors, invented these new and ingenious ways of casting blame on the DLP establishment”.
    It is stupidly laughable how DLPites refuse to accept the fact that it is one of their own Ministers of Government who publicly blamed his administration for the economic mess created in the country.


  8. Oh come on now balance, I know that you’re now not cerebral – insufficient because I quite certain you were around when Dr Don Blackman did the same thing to the BLP in the middle 80’s?


  9. balance | March 22, 2014 at 7:56 PM |

    It is stupidly laughable how DLPites refuse to accept the fact that it is one of their own Ministers of Government who publicly blamed his administration for the economic mess created in the country.

    ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… balance the truth is that we dlpites do “accept::: also the the truth of the matter we know WHY,,,,,


  10. Balance, have I triggered that elusive memory as of yet? Lol
    I have a lot of dirty on the BLP, so it would be within your best interest to thread easily my friend.


  11. David | March 22, 2014 at 6:05 PM

    Estwick has become the laughing stock of all an sundry. Those who will give him an obligatory smile to respect his official status they will snigger as soon as he turns his back. This will be his legacy – YESWICK!

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… his legacy cannot and will not be written or dictated by those waiting to see him fall,,.


  12. And it will NOT be rewritten by the yardfowls.

  13. are-we-there-yet? Avatar
    are-we-there-yet?

    Re. the question about the reasons why Estwick and Arthur voted as they did at the end of the estimates debate, Estwick sticking with his Government and OSA with his feet, seems fairly clear.

    Estwick was trying to ensure that his colleagues qualified for their pensions and OSA was making sure that the occasion would not propel the BLP to taking over the Government at this time.

    Both actions were somewhat unpatriotic since the DLP’s actions clearly merit their being kicked out of office and that it is also clear that they cannot lead us successfully out of this economic morass. Estwick knows this and chose to hold his nose and vote for party and friends. OSA also knows that if there is a very slender chance for this Island to come out of the morass the DLP has led us into it is by a turnaround under the BLP, but he chose to also put party first since if they came to power now or soon they would only last for one term or less because of the harshness of the medicine they would have to ensure is taken by the country.

    Woe is us.

  14. DLP (formerly CBC) TV Avatar
    DLP (formerly CBC) TV

    WOW… WOW… WOW….is all I have to say. When you think the DEMS have sunk to an all time low they find some way to burrow their way further down the credibility abyss. I personally did not expect Estwick to do anything major politically right now.. i expected him at most to abstain from voting and the gov’t would still have the majority. For him to actually vote yes in light of him detailing an “alternative economic plan” it is just baffling. No one will ever take Estwick seriously again. the DEMS carrying this country for a ride down a black hole and the populace just further disillusioned with this circus we calling gov’t. The country suffering and the DEMS playing games. Well keep it up. If you think about it, Estwick is a just a personification of the DEMs as a whole; he does say one thing but does something completely different.
    I expect the DEMS to make a mountain of Owen not voting but the reality is that unless two gov’t MPs don’t vote at all or one votes no…. two very unlikely scenarios… then the BLP cannot deny the motion. Owen realises this and knows his vote would not change anything. The onus is on gov’t to make sure all their MPs vote or be caught out by the BLP. This is added to the downright sham this Gov’t is. I mean you have an Estimates that basically states that the MOF has failed horribly to right the economy based on last year’s budget targets , for the same MOF, who now has a proven track record of failure, to lay down more “austerity” for Parliament to pass. I, like Owen, would not want to be part of that farce.


  15. The truth of the matter is the people of Barbados chose the better of two evil as the saying goes. The BLP message failed to take root with the majority of Barbadians simply put. So the BLP have but itself to blame for articulating a message so poorly conceived. You can’t turn around and then accused the electorate of being ignorant and ill- informed, when you yourself have inconspicuous and inarticulately advanced your ill- conceived agenda.


  16. Now dompey, you know better but like a true Dem, you ignore the truth. The Dems only won because they had money coming through their ears and they bought votes…………plain and simple witnessed by the worst PM and the worst AG this country has ever had the misfortune to have. It had nothing to do with message. Had that been the case, there is no way that the DLP could be re-elected….they had NO message!

    If you call cussing MAM and OSA a message!

  17. PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad Avatar
    PLANTATION DEEDS FROM 1926 TO 2014 , MASSIVE FRAUD ,LAND TAX BILLS AND NO DEEDS OF BARBADOS, BLPand DLP=Massive Fruad

    DLP and BLP are dogs and rats , if you chop them up small and fine ,, you can fry them in rice , make them taste good , But you still eating dog and rat. Under a different name on the menu ,

  18. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    David

    I was not following this thread and only decided to do a little light reading when I saw your question to me at 11:32 a.m. You asked:

    Some time ago you brought to public attention inaccuracies in the election filings of the MP for NW and others. Where do we go from here? How do we coral this bullshit?

    Sadly, we can’t do anything with that information. The statute of limitation is one year. That is why they took the laid off workers from the Drainage Division to Sherbourne and gave them false hopes of being re- employed. So that none of them would come forward with evidence of vote buying before the anniversary of the elections.

    Prodigal

    Similarly, I did not see your comment before but the answer to your question is:

    I have been approached by senior members of NUPW with the prospect of returning to that union. You know what they say about never saying never but as it stands now I would not sell my soul to become General Secretary of NUPW or anything else for that matter. That union needs serious reforms: firstly, I will not be led by one of those who only passed water at school. Also, there is too much stealing and general corruption for me. I would not be able to work comfortably among them.

    Rest assured you will not see me anywhere near NUPW in its present form. I pride myself in not being a thief.

Leave a Reply to CloneCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading