Submitted by Pachamama
John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) was assassinated in Dallas, USA on November 22nd 1963
John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) was assassinated in Dallas, USA on November 22nd 1963

For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children’s future. And we are all mortal.” – JFK

Everybody seems to remember a gloomy day on November 22nd 1963 when a volley of bullets rang out in Dallas killing John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK), POTUS, and injuring Texas governor Connolly. Despite 50 years of propaganda by the conspirators to cover up the murder of the most powerful man in the world, the truth has emerged. In the last 50 years 2000 books have been written about these events, dozens of movies, many more documentaries, hundreds of unofficial investigations and several official investigations. Some of these official investigations were indeed conducted or controlled by the very people who were part of the criminal conspiracy, to as they said, ‘rid the world of Communism’.

As part of the basic conspiracy related persons and possible witnesses were killed, including one JFK’s lovers. More importantly, there was a larger conspiracy by government agencies to kill Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK), Robert F. Kennedy (RFK), the US Attorney General in 1963 and brother of the slain JFK and the FBI supported program called “Cointelpro’’ to prevent the rise of a Black messianic figure in the USA. Of course, there were other security operations like ‘zipper’ and so on. We will argue that there are many critical links between, among and within the forces that committed the murder of JFK.  It is now clear that a coalition of forces within the FBI, the CIA, Naval Intelligence and the Pentagon not only killed JFK, but more importantly, had the means, opportunity and motives to kill and cover up this assassination. These events have changed the very nature of the US Presidency and government from a democracy to the variant of oligarchy and fascism which we have today.

By 1963 JFK, who came to office nearly three years earlier as a hawkish Democrat, had been guided into The Bay of Pigs debacle in Cuba, the Vietnam War, the Cuban Missile Crisis and more hostile diplomatic relations with USSR’s President Sergeyevich Khrushchev at the height of the Cold War. Also by 1963, JFK had come to see the futility of the Cold War and had opened back-channels with Khrushchev to end it, rid the earth of ALL nuclear weapons and engage in normal relations with the USSR. The belligerent hawks, like General Curtis Lemay, within the military-industrial-security apparatus, the FBI, the CIA, naval intelligence etc accused JFK of being a Commie and recruited a gangster, Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ), Vice-President at the time, to be part of this criminal conspiracy to subvert an elected government and assassinate JFK. Our revered Malcolm X, at the time, deemed it as ‘chickens coming home to roost’.

What do we know about LBJ? Let’s get what people say are the good things out of the way first. It is said that he shepherd the Civil Rights legislation through Congress. That he showed a higher level of commitment than JFK to civil rights issues. That he was more amenable to working with Black people, etc. The first mistake JFK made was to, in a perfunctory manner, offered the vice-presidency slot to LBJ. This is oftentimes done in the American political system, as a mere gesture to powerful contenders, but it generally expected that these offers are to be declined as players have a ‘keen’ sense of who the real VP nominee is to be, all this as part of the political shenanigans – not LBJ! He had worked hard to put himself into contention at the DNC conference and felt he was more deserving of the presidency that the son of a former bootlegger, Irish Mafia figure and supporter of the Third Reich.

LBJ was also known to be an uncouth fellow who would fart hard in public, was long associated with a known killer Malcolm or Max Wallace who did his wet work, he was known to have a deep resentment for JFK. Wallace was thought to have killed more than eight people for LBJ. LBJ and RFK as attorney general never got along well. One of his mistresses, from whom he fathered a child, Madeline Brown, said he was a drunkard, an animal, admitted that LBJ told her about the planning of the JFK assassination, that it was a two year plan, that he impregnated another intern and made one of his aides, Jack Vallini marry her. LBJ was from Texas and would have known political environment and being a power former legislator and vice president had the ability to influence the facts on the ground that dreadful day in 1963. Most importantly, all the major initiatives embarked upon by JFK were immediately reversed by LBJ. For example, involvement in Indo-China, the Vietnam War was escalated in contrast to the de-escalation JFK was talking about thereby swelling the coffers of the arms manufacturers for whom JKF’s new found peaceful intent represented a strategic threat. Volume could be written indicting LBJ for being the front man in the murder of JFK.

What of the other conspirators? Let’s talk about FBI director Edgar Hoover. We know he keep files on all US officials as a lever to get them to comply with his wishes. By this time he had amassed vast powers within the bureaucracy. Hoover, a gay man, had a longtime live-in relationship with his chief deputy within the FBI. Some reports say that Hoover had videos of JFK engaging in sexual relations with women other than his wife. It is said he once showed these pictures to RFK to influence a decision. Both LBJ and Hoover were known to have ‘acquaintances’ with mafia figures. It is also reported that the major Mafia don, Trafficante had pictures of Hoover having homosexual relations. It was the same Hoover who, up to 1963, was still denying that any knowledge about the existence of the Mafia. These are the informal and formal relationships that existed amongst leading figure at the time. Relationships that were necessary conditions to get away with the murder and cover-up of the most powerful man in the world.

What about the nonsense of the lone gunman theory, that the patsy Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. The lone gunman theory is essential to deflecting blame from the real killers. It reappears time and time again in the assassinations of RFK, King and other civil rights leaders during this time period. This theory could only make sense when the death of JFK is opportunistically removed from the larger national, international, geo-political context. It could only make sense if one does now know that the trigger men, and there were three, included LBJ’s wet work man Malcolm (Max) Wallace and an American Indian by the name of Loy Factor. This theory, and it is all it has been and still is, only makes sense if we ignore that Jack Ruby, the killer of Oswald, was a Mafioso figure with strong connections to the mob and was at high levels planning meeting. Meetings attended by high government officials prior to Kennedy’s death. This only makes sense when you ignore the charges of five people who claim that LBJ admitted to his involvement in the assassination of JFK. This could only make sense when we ignore the mountain of forensic evidence pointing at a massive government conspiracy before, during and after JFK’ death  that modern investigative tools are presenting.

Whenever there is a crime the police try to determine three critical ingredient – motive, opportunity and means. In our brief overview of the most notorious murder of the 20th Century we have, on the personal level located LBJ as the one man having a motive, the opportunity and the means to kill JFK. More fundamentally we have indicted the organs of the federal and state governments of the USA as having planned, executed and most importantly covering up the murder of JFK. We have connected the murder of JFK to that of RFK to that of MLK and indeed Malcolm X. We have painted a tapestry of criminality at the center of the American government that ended in a series of high profile murders. Murders which have fundamentally changed the character of American democracy, if one has determined that it what it was. Fifty years since these killings it must not be a time for the sanctification of victimhood but a time to indict the people and governmental apparatus which have irretrievably changed the world.

65 responses to “Did Johnson Kill Kennedy?”


  1. @Mark Fenty In case you haven’t noticed, I did not mention anywhere that the Warren Commission implicated Johnson as a suspect. Of course it would not! He appointed the people to the commission. And who did he appoint to as the head of the Warren Commission? That would be none other than former CIA director Allen Dulles. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that this is the very same Allen Dulles who was responsible for intentionally misleading the newly elected president Kennedy about the Bay of Pigs Operation in 1961 — in effect trying to force him into war with Revolutionary Cuba. He was subsequently relieved of his post as head of the CIA for this act of insubordination after serving as director for almost nine years. Dulles had an axe to grind when it came to the Kennedy brothers. This is very well-documented. So why is it that he was the first person that Johnson ran to when it came to discovering who was responsible for the death of a president Dulles begrudged?

    Furthermore, Lyndon Johnson was very two-faced when it came to Civil Rights issues. He believed in and worked to get some monumental Civil Rights legislation passed in his term, but he also signed off on and refused to rein in FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s malicious war against Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, and other human rights activists. And he signed off on Hoover’s wire-tapping.

    http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/98apr/lbj.htm :
    “Though Johnson in principle disliked taping and wiretaps, he secretly taped more than 7,500 of his own telephone conversations as President. Moreover, during the 1964 campaign, after a visit to the White House, Richard Russell wrote, “Hoover has apparently been turned loose and is tapping everything…. [Johnson] stated it took him hours each night to read them all (but he loves this).” ”

    So much for “civil liberties”. (lip service) (-:
    And what was done in Vietnam, although Kennedy certainly does share a certain portion of the blame for U.S. involvement over there as do Truman and Eisenhower, cannot be eradicated from Johnson’s record no matter how much you may wish to overlook it. Following the inauguration of President Lyndon B. Johnson to his own elected term in 1964, the nation’s war efforts in Vietnam increased dramatically. At the time of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination in late 1963, about 12,000 military personnel were stationed in Vietnam. By early 1968, after four years of the Johnson Administration, that number had increased to more than 500,000 combat troops fighting on the ground in one of the most horrific and violent wars the world has ever known. This horrible travesty would eventually take the lives of nearly 60,000 Americans and an astounding 1,000,000 Vietnamese.
    http://ushypocrisy.com/2013/01/09/the-king-that-was-and-the-king-that-wasnt-martin-luther-king-jr-vs-capitalism-militarism-and-racism-then-and-now-part-1-of-3/


  2. .”Your eyes are still closed to the idealogies/and the philosphy of aVISIONARY LEADER like JFK who was far advance in his yearsand was not limited and held back to pursue his dreams and aspirations for a better world. ”

    My eyes might be closed but I am not blind like you to the reality that truth counts and not fiction. If you want to hold Mr Kennedy on a pedestal of nothingness, that is your prerogative.


  3. To define Mr Kennedy as ” a pedestal of nothingness is : complete balderdash, here is a President who had a vision of putting men on the moon .yet you define john f kennedy as a pedestal of ,nothingness. do you not realise that most of the advances we have in technology was a result of such boldness vision and foresight , you can;t be possibly be so out of touch not to understand the importance of such an undertaking at a time when technology was in its formative years. or would you prefer out of ignorance to be contrite and adversarial in your comments towards a president who in his short term did achieved what others might have seen as sheer madness , Maybe you should take a look right in our back yard and reflect upon those who have brought this little island almost to a ‘State of nothingness:” while putting those in charge on a pedestal . there is where YOU would find the true meaning ..


  4. Balance
    SUrely notan admirer of the Democrats which is the acknowledged party of slavery and under whose administrations the worst atrocities against black people in America were committed
    *******
    If you are laying atrocities against Black people in America at the feet of the Democrats surely you must feel the same for the actions of the Brits, French, Spanish, Dutch, and Belgians et al who enslaved and colonialized our people (and others) all over the world. If Democrats were the party of Slavery today’s Republicans are the party of States rights.

    The Slaves were freed circa 1861 fast forward to 1948 (which presumably is in your lifetime), the Democrats introduced a Civil Rights agenda at their Presidential convention which immediately caused white Southern delegates (led by Strom Thurmond who later became a staunch Republican)) to flee the party. Thurmond contested the Presidential Election as a third Party candidate with the support of these “Dixiecrats” campaigning for States Rights i.e. keeping Jim Crow laws and segregation in place.

    In the 1960’s Nixon adopted what has been called “Southern Strategy” which was to capture the votes of the “whites” in the formerly Confederate States by supporting “States Rights” i.e. flying of the Confederate Flag at Statehouses and lack enforcement of Civil rights and Voting laws which in turn caused Black people to leave the Republican Party. Nixon argued that the Black votes he lost would be more than made up by the white votes he gained in the South. Since then the Republicans have had hegemony on the votes in the Southern states

    Today’s Republican Party is not as overt but the same attitudes prevail why did Reagan and Bush Jr. seek the endorsement of Bob Jones and visit the University as one of their first acts on the campaign trail?. Recently the US Supreme Court voted to invalidate sections of the Voting Rights act which effectively meant that nine Southern States can change Election laws without Federal approval and the Republican Governor of Texas moved immediately to change the law which will effectively constrain Black people from voting, other Republican led States are sure to follow.

    You can continue to admire the nonexistent party of Lincoln, but a black person voting for the Republicans would be like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.


  5. ‘If you are laying atrocities against Black people in America at the feet of the Democrats surely you must feel the same for the actions of the Brits, French, Spanish, Dutch, and Belgians et al who enslaved and colonialized our people (and others) all over the world. If Democrats were the party of Slavery today’s Republicans are the party of States rights”

    I thought that our line of thought was directed to President Kennedy and as a consequence the USA. The shameful role of the Europeans in conquering lands and enslaving people for their own benefit is well documented in history but there are some like the Kennedy’s of America whose fairy tale Camelot like roles are inflated beyond imagination for consumption by a gullible public. When their contributions are genuinely weighed in the balance, they are usually found wanting. unlike the contributions of unsung like Mahatma Gandhi, Mother Theresa, Rosa Parks, Winston Churchill, Wendel Mcclean, Steve Biko, Clement Payne, Uriah Butler, Marcus Garvey, for example.


  6. “In the 1960’s Nixon adopted what has been called “Southern Strategy” which was to capture the votes of the “whites” in the formerly Confederate States by supporting “States Rights” i.e. flying of the Confederate Flag at Statehouses and lack enforcement of Civil rights and Voting laws which in turn caused Black people to leave the Republican Party. Nixon argued that the Black votes he lost would be more than made up by the white votes he gained in the South. Since then the Republicans have had hegemony on the votes in the Southern states”

    ALL OF THE ABOVE IS RECORDED AS TRUE BUT THAT DOES NOT NEGATE THE TRUTH EITHER THAT THE DEMOCRATS WERE THE PARTY OF SLAVERY AND SOME OF THE WORST ATROCITIES COMMITTED AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE WERE DURING THEIR TIME IN OFFICE ANDTHAT THEY HAVE HELD THE REINS OF POWER LONGER THAN ANY OTHER PARTY IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN GOVERNANCE AND HAVE BEEN THE BENEFICIARY OF THE MAJORITY BLACK VOTE SINCE THE POLITICAL EXPEDIENT POLICY OF NIXON TO CAPTURE THE WHITE DEMOCRATIC VOTE OF THE REPRESSIVE SOUTHERN STATES IN HIS BID FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN 1960 ANS THAT ONE OF THEIR HIGHEST RANKING AND LONGSERVING MEMBERS WAS THE NOW DECEASED ROBERT BYRD WHO HELD THE INFAMOUS TITLE OF GRAND WIZARD IN THE OPPRESSIVE KU KLUX KLAN ORGANIZATION FOR MANY YEARS AND THAT THE MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS VOTED UP TO 1960 AGAINST THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL AND VOTING RIGHTS BILL WHICH WAS PASSED BECAUSE OF REPUBLICAN MAJORITY SUPPORT AND THAT UP TO JANUARY 2008 , EVIDENCE INDICATES THAT PRESIDENT CLINTON’S FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE ROBERT REICH HAD REASON TO COMMENT ON CLINTON’S RACIALLY TINGED REMARKS AGAINST OBAMA AND I QUOTE ” BILL CLINTON’S ILL-TEMPERED AND ILL-FOUNDED ATTACKS ON BARACK OBAMA ARE DOING NO CREDIT TO THE FORMER PRESIDENT , HIS LEGACY, OR HIS WIFE’S CAMPAIGN. NOR ARE THEY HELPING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ( MY EMPHASIS WHAT IS THE CONCERN- THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY- READ MY LIPS) ..NOW, SADLY, WE’RE WITNESSING A SMEAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST OBAMA THAT EMPLOYS SOME OF THE WORST ASPECTS OF THE OLD POLITICS.”
    ALL THAT HAPPENED IS THAT OBAMA TUMPED AND OVERWHELMED THE PARTY MACHINE WITH THE KIND OF CAMPAIGN THEY HAD NEVER SEEN BEFORE AND SEEING THE WRITING ON THE WALL COMMONSENSE DICTATED THAT THEY DUMP THE ACKNOWLEGED AND PREFERRED PARTY CANDIDATE FOR A BRIGHT MIXED RACE GOODLOOKING FELLOW WITH THE PUBLIC BEHIND THEM WHO ‘WILL DO’


  7. Today’s Republican Party is not as overt but the same attitudes prevail why did Reagan and Bush Jr. seek the endorsement of Bob Jones and visit the University as one of their first acts on the campaign trail?. Recently the US Supreme Court voted to invalidate sections of the ‘
    The difference between the two white parties is that the republicans do heir business overtly and I prefer it that way so I can know how I stand but the democrats praise blacks outwardly but despise them covertly and you know us blacks- only tell us things we want to hear and you could do we anything else. the DLP party has proven to be a maser of that tactic over the years.


  8. Balance you attacking your party –mamomey -cutloose the middleclass Maloney will get ride of you from your employment and he got Denis in his pocket becareful


  9. @balance
    Good points!

    The bottomline on politics and Politicians in the US and Bim is THEY WILL DO and SAY ANYTHING for VOTES!

    The last aspect that interests most Pols is what is the correct long term course of actions that leads to a much stronger Nation.

    Telling the populace the truth is not popular, so string them along for 4-8 years and tough if we ruin the country in the process. After all the Pols have good pension plans and thief plenty $$$$$ to feather their nests.


  10. Balance
    Your responses are becoming seemingly “unbalanced” a man clutching at straws dragging the DLP, Winston Churchill and other figures into a conversation about American politics and racial divisiveness in the USA. You also mentioned the “white” Parties in the USA isn’t the majority of the population “white” at present? What should be the majority composition of the Parties?

    You have not refuted any of the facts presented about the actions of the Parties in the Post War period when the Democrats became more inclusive and amenable to Civil and Voting Rights the Republicans more exclusive. I also said that Kennedy was receptive to Civil Rights and met MLK and others when they couldn’t get an audience with his predecessor “Ike”.

    As for Obama at least he had a chance to succeed in the Democratic Party where is his equivalent in the Republican Party? Oh yes they had Michael Steele as Chair of the Party soon after Obama was elected and couldn’t wait to kick him out of Office and blame him for every misfortune that they encountered. I hope you had the opportunity to look up JC Watts once a rising “black” figure in the Republican Party and lastly this is 2013 soon to be 2014 don’t get stuck in 1913 the Universe is continuing to unfold.


  11. like Ac you can continue to fool yourself that the Democratic party machine genuinely in the last 50 years have made such a dramatic volte-face to their repressive policies policies against blacks for over 150 years that hatred and oppression of blacks is now erased from their evil psyche. imght be all over the place but you can’t dispute what i havewritten..on another note, i should add that the DLP did do some progressive things up to 1976


  12. Let me stress this point because we ough to understand this before we start to spewing our nonesense. Anyone who have had any knowledge of President Kennedy, knows quite well that he wasn’t a perfect man by any stretched of the human imagination. He have had his faults and failings as well as you and I. So we ought to start from that premise first friends.


  13. […] Did Johnson Kill Kennedy? (bajan.wordpress.com) […]


  14. The Americans do not have Royalty like Europeans and Africans. Therefore they tried to create the Kennedy Myth to compensate for lack of their own Royalty.

    JP Kennedy was a rascal and when Roosevelt appointed him to oversee the Stock Exchange he said, “you have to put a crook to catch crooks”.
    JPK asked the Chicago mafia to break legs in order to have his son elected.
    To this day it is likely that Nixon actually won that election! Death threats are a high level motivator!


  15. […] Did Johnson Kill Kennedy? (bajan.wordpress.com) […]

The blogmaster invites you to join the discussion.

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading