Hal Austin
Hal Austin

Introduction:
Not so long ago, the veteran Grenada-born UK broadcaster Alex Pascall invited me to give a short address to a group of Caribbean elders reflecting on the last 60 years of our presence in the UK. This was followed shortly after by a St Vincent-born retired teacher, who was asked by the senior Methodist minister at her church whey there was a noticeable absence of African Caribbean intellectuals in British life, unlike the 1960s and 70s. It was something that concerned me privately for sometime. Although in a superficial way this has no direct connection with Barbados, in a real way it does, since the lack of dynamism in the African Caribbean community in Britain has similar echoes in the Caribbean.

British Publish Space:
The observation that the Caribbean dimension to British public discussions is missing is very astute and the minister should be complimented for his profound perception. This absence, or more properly marginalisation, is particularly observant in the press, in local and national policymaking, in the work place, and most disappointing of all, in the universities and think-tanks. Even on matters of direct interest to the Caribbean community, the debate is usually between opposing white views and, on very rare occasions with a black input by default – a David Lammy or Trevor Phillips.

The other default position is using an Asian voice to speak on behalf of black people – Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of the Independent, for example. This is also seen in book reviews, profiles of black entertainers, sportspersons, etc; black people may be the performers, but they are never invited to articulate their art or skills, on the presumption that they are not intelligent enough to theorise their performances or skills.

Currently, there is a nationwide debate on immigration, which purports to be about the European Union and the right of Bulgarians and Romanians to enter the British labour market. While this is the case with organised politics, ignoring for the time being the recent Queen’s Speech, given the rise of Ukip and its setting of the electoral agenda, forcing the other political parties to drift rightward, the Bulgarian/Romanian nexus is not the agenda for the popular phone-in radio programmes. On those programmes (led by the London radio station LBC) the talk from callers is about the growing segregation of London, white flight, the growing ratio of non-white Londoners and other stereotypes that one thought had gone out of fashion in the 1960s, such as blacks smell, etc. Afro Caribbeans are blamed for knife and gun crime – in fact, most of the victims and perpetrators are African – and an overall rise in criminality.

For those of us who live in London, where 25 per cent of residents are foreign-born, and read the Russian-owned Evening Standard, which purports to be the Greater London regional newspaper, the absence of black people from its news pages, except in negative terms (crime, illiteracy, unemployment, poor housing, etc) is astounding.

The black community, mainly the Caribbeans, are over-policed, not just by people in uniforms, but by the creeping army of privatised police, so-called security guards who assume that they too have a mandate from the wider society to police those more likely to cause trouble. Legislation now going through parliament gives this right to landlords, employers, national health service staff, and family doctors.

Even in the low-paid basic jobs such as fast-food restaurants, cleaners on the underground, working in the kitchens of City firms, Caribbean people are squeezed out to noticeably make room for Eastern Europeans, EU student-types, Australians, New Zealanders, South Africans, Latin Americans, Africans, Bangladeshis and others.

Even at the height of the ten-year economic boom which ended with the banking crisis and the housing bubble, black unemployment was more than double the average, and for the 16-24 year olds, always in double figures. It now stands at about 50 per cent.

Even those young people who want to better themselves by going to college or getting more conventional skills training, often find themselves accepted on to courses to make the numbers, but comprising a higher ration of the failed students. Nursing degrees at some of our second-rate former polytechnics are good examples.

We have seen numerous examples of young men being suspected of crime being executed or badly beaten by various arms of the state – by shooting or beating to death while in police custody, or being ignored and left to die or receiving poor treatment in hospitals. Being black in modern Britain is now a capital offence. Those professionals who escape the stereotyping and professional ghettoising are constantly challenged by ethnic juniors who question their competence, if they respond, they are accused of being aggressive, forceful, anti-social, angry, even violent.

Black people, and in particular Caribbean people, are always the ‘other’, the ‘primitive’ artist, the ‘self-taught’ singer, the ‘natural’ performer, not properly trained or taught in the modern European way. Ironically, during the Thatcher years the black voice was at its most vocal, being central to the Labour Party Leftwing project, led by Ken Livingstone, at the GLC, the numerous Labour-led London councils, and in some of the regions such as Sheffield, Liverpool and Birmingham, all of which opposed Thatcherism.

The systematic marginalisation of the Caribbean voice began under the rise of New Labour as it was seen as part of the anti-Tony Blair Leftwing. At the same time, groups such as the Conservative Black Councillors, were slowly allowed to wither and die on the political vine as a new generation of black Conservatives were taken inside the inner circle of the Tory party. We are now witnessing a political environment in which Compassionate Conservatives, LibDems and One Nation Labour routinely attack black people as an easy way to re-gain popularity – just read the Queen’s Speech. So, the marginalisation of Caribbean intellectuals from the popular debate is not surprising; it is part of the broader marginalisation of Caribbean social and cultural life – and, predictably, it is the Caribbean community itself which is often blamed.

Entrepreneurialism:
Of course, we as Caribbean people are not perfect and one of the most glaring faults in our social organisation is the lack of a black or Afro-Caribbean economy. By this I do not mean there are no enterprising individuals from the community, but rather the lack of coherent business organisations and individuals providing the goods and services that the community badly needs.

Where are the teachers providing the Saturday schools, private tutorials and one-to-one teaching that so many of our young people so badly need? Where are the garages that provide the top quality vehicle maintenance, the builders providing first-rate service, the electricians, plumbers, and so on. Too often there are complaints about people wanting to do work in the ‘black’ – avoiding the tax man – ignoring the legal consequences if the work goes badly wrong. How about the electricians and plumbers who walk out to go to bigger better paying jobs, leaving the individual homeowner with dangerous bare wires hanging or toilets not flushing? How about our doctors, lawyers, architects, financial advisers, the people who should be providing leadership to the community? What about the surly and often bad mannered service we get in the little take-away restaurants, forcing many people to spend their money with businesses owned by other ethnic groups when they would rather not? In many cases we have internalised the very contempt that the host community, and the so-called New Britons, have for us by treating each other in much the same way.

Analysis and Conclusion:
We have now reached a stage when the marginalisation is almost complete; we are collectively forced, if lucky, in to low wage jobs with few if any prospects, poorer housing, our children’s education is neglected and ignored, and every white member of society, including the newly arrived Eastern Europeans, think they have a natural right to lecture us on good manners and social behaviour. We are routinely denied justice, even though we are more likely to be victims of crime rather than the perpetrators – whatever the tabloid newspapers may say. Our Christian religious beliefs are ignored if not treated as the obsessions of a primitive people, while those of other ethnic and religious groups are treated as the beliefs of a more culturally sophisticated people.

We have seen the national hypocrisy of elevating the Stephen Lawrence murder in to some kind of national grieving while the almost daily maltreatment of young men – and a few women – by the criminal justice system has become normalised. Then there are those who claim that we as a people should be grateful that we are given opportunities in Great Britain which, in many cases, we would not have been given at home. This claim to relative gratefulness is disingenuous and, in many ways, is a very part of the racism we face as part of our everyday lives.

In fact, like in Nazi Germany, some black people themselves become perpetrators of the oppressors’ racism in the silly belief that if the young muggers, and single mothers, and illiterates were to go away everything would improve for us as a community. Of course, they conveniently forget that the ideal model of this form of assimilation, the Jewish community, has faced neo-Nazi violence in every European nation, almost every day since the ending of the Second World War. Here they are, the best educated, the most sophisticated, the perceived most law-abiding, and in many ways the most silent of all ethnic and religious communities in Britain, yet they are not spared any of the contempt of large sections of the white community, working class and professional class.

Then there is the intellectual cover, the assault on multi-culturalism, the casual dismissal of the doctrine of equality, the very battles that have led to the global fight over militant Islamism. Even in matters of our health we are ignored, even when we suffer disproportionately, such as prostate cancer (three times as high as white men), there is no attempt to appeal direct to them, not even on good public health grounds.

The marginalisation of the African Caribbean community in Britain is almost complete.

57 responses to “Notes From a Native Son: Is There a Future for African Caribbean Enterprise in the UK”


  1. I have been waiting for a graduate from Waterford High school to step forward and denounce Hal’s analysis of Stanton Gittens but alas non has been forthcoming so I must reluctantly conclude that “the ayes have it”.

    Disclaimer: I did not know the gentleman other than hearing his name as HM of the aforementioned School but was frequently entertained by stories of his forays into the announcing booth when cricket was being broadcast by Rediffusion.


  2. Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is excellent, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about Notes From a Native Son: Is There a Future for African Caribbean Enterprise in the UK | Barbados Underground .


  3. Wow, awesome blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is magnificent, as well as the content!. Thanks For Your article about Notes From a Native Son: Is There a Future for African Caribbean Enterprise in the UK | Barbados Underground .


  4. @ David,

    This is an excellent contribution from Hal Austin and a host of others. I always found him to be pompous and aloof. However he does have an excellent, analytical mind.

    Here are two interesting stories:

    In the land of opportunity, African immigrants veer closer to the poverty trap

    http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/ndemo/-/2274486/2939340/-/8oxm6/-/index.html

    and

    EU leaders offer Africa a grand bargain over migration with no bearing on the real world

    Analysis: The EU will ask Africa to take back your huddled masses – and send us instead your students, researchers and entrepreneurs

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11981655/EU-leaders-offer-Africa-a-grand-bargain-over-migration-with-no-bearing-on-the-real-world.html


  5. @Exclaimer

    He ducked on us but we soldier on.

    On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Barbados Underground wrote:

    >


  6. Here is a copy of a speech by a prominent Barbadian in Canada. It is worth a serious analysis.

    IMMIGRATION, MULTICULTURALISM & DIVERSITY IN CANADA
    Keith A. P. Sandiford
    I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
    Mr Justin Trudeau, the present Prime Minister of Canada, is making a great deal of his determination to promote a programme of multiculturalism and diversity in such a way as to make our country the one most likely to attract hard-working and useful immigrants to a place long famous for its enormous size and incredible underdevelopment. Canada is almost 3,856,000 square miles in extent but caters only to a population of less than 38 million souls. It is larger, that is to say, than the United States of America with its 328 million people occupying approximately less than 3,538,000 square miles. Canada is also just marginally smaller than the whole of Europe, whose present population is estimated at almost 743 million as of January 2019 in an area measuring 3,930,000 square miles. There is no question that Canada has been severely underdeveloped ever since its indigenous population lost control of the land. One of the major reasons for this situation, quite ironically, is that, until very recently, the Canadian government persisted in retaining some of the harshest Immigration Laws imaginable. It was not until the 1950s that Blacks and Browns were offered any opportunity to settle in this country. While white alumni from the prestigious Caribbean secondary schools had always been encouraged to immigrate here and make useful contributions to the country’s development, others were discouraged. Such white Barbadians, for example, as Professor Charles Bourne, Dr Wesley Bourne, Dr James Bovell, Colonel Richard Clement Moody, Lt Commander Wesley Alleyne Seale, Henry Peter Simmons, John Taylor and Professor Emeritus Frederick Winter all left indelible marks on Canadian life and culture. In stark contrast, thousands of black alumni of Combermere School, Harrison College and The Lodge had joined the Canadian military services during World War I and World War II and hundreds of them had sacrificed their lives on behalf of the British Empire. Very few of them received promotions or were offered Canadian citizenship. And it took several decades of determined action on the part of Owen Rowe (1922-2005), a native of St George, Barbados, to have
    1
    governmental approval to establish a plaque in Ottawa in memory of those Caribbean-Canadian soldiers who had made enormous sacrifices during World War II. Finally, on 11 November 2000, he managed to persuade the federal government to lay a wreath at the Cenotaph in Ottawa “in honour of West Indian WWII Veterans”. Owen Rowe’s experience is simply one indication of the extent of Canadian racism throughout the 20th century. All kinds of opportunities were cruelly denied the Blacks and the Browns from the Caribbean and elsewhere. Coloured alumni from the prestigious secondary schools could enter this country, on Student Visas, to further their education at places like McGill University and the University of Toronto. Others were allowed to enter as “Landed Immigrants” to work temporarily on farms or as porters on the trains. The only loophole left to the Non-Whites was the Naturalisation Clause which automatically offered full Canadian citizenship to any person (of whatever origin) who was born in this country. One particular Barbadian family of no little renown was destined to make considerable use of this “birthing” clause. It was the Searles Family from St James that eventually played a major role in persuading the Government to liberalize Canada’s Immigration Policy. II. INITIAL CRACKS IN THE CONSERVATIVE WALL The situation gradually changed during the 1950s. Canada found itself in dire need of domestics, nannies and nurses. It therefore decided to import hundreds of Caribbean young women, as landed immigrants, to fill these needs. They had to come without their husbands, parents and their children. They came literally in droves, settling particularly in Ontario and Quebec; but full citizenship remained beyond their grasp and the vast majority of them were left at the mercy of wealthy and white landlords and landladies, who could always hold the threat of deportation over their heads. It took a vigorous and prolonged protest from Caribbean leaders in Montreal and Toronto to bring about some liberal reforms during the time of John Diefenbaker’s tenure. These changes had nothing whatever to do with Pierre Elliot Trudeau or his son, Justin, as several Canadian journalists have recently been claiming. The major advocates of liberal Immigration Reform were actually black community leaders with Caribbean roots, such as the Barbadians Donald Willard Moore (1913-94), Edsworth Searles (1921-2009), (Dr Gerald Searles (1925-2006), and Dr Kenneth Searles (1923-2001) and Jamaicans
    2
    like Bromley Armstrong (1926-2018), Harry Gairey (1898-1993) and Stanley Grizzle (1918-2016). They founded the Negro Citizenship Association (NCA) in 1951 and campaigned earnestly for some measures to release the domestics (especially) from their peculiar form of slavery in its modern guise. Led by Donald Moore, they organized a delegation to Ottawa in 1954 to seek reasonable amendments to the existing Immigration Laws. They were royally and repeatedly snubbed by Louis St Laurent, the Liberal prime minister. It was not therefore before 1958, thanks mainly to the support of the Conservative “Dief the Chief”, that legislation was finally passed to permit post-colonial Blacks and Browns to apply for permanent residence. This law, however, soon needed to be buttressed by several other legislative measures to make life liveable for the Caribbean-Canadians in big urban centres like Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. The first was the “Fair Accommodation Practices Act” of 1961. This was eventually followed by a new “Bill of Rights” which announced the principle of “racial equally before the law”. Later on, a more comprehensive “Charter of Rights and Freedoms” had to be passed. As the gulf between white and coloured jobs and salaries continued to widen, the Government tried its best to legislate some form of equity. But such efforts have never really succeeded. Racist Whites, in spite of the new legislation, continued to discriminate against the Blacks and Browns so furiously that the Non-whites gradually found themselves confined to urban ghettos from which the Whites had angrily departed. From the very best jobs and the very best areas the Blacks, Browns and Yellows found themselves steadily excluded – as had so long been the case in the UK and the US. III. THE SITUATION BECOMES MORE COMPLICATED Considering that post-colonial Blacks and Browns had come mainly to Canada, the UK and the US with similar European cultural habits and religious beliefs, it was mainly racism which often militated against the establishment of so-called “melting pots” and mosaics”. The problem has become considerably more complex in recent years when millions of Arabs, Asians, Buddhists, Hindus, Indians, Jains, Muslims and Sikhs began to seek refuge in the West. Their religions, ideologies and behaviours are too vastly different to be squeezed comfortably into any kind of “melting pot” or “mosaic”. All too often, Eastern religions and traditions are woven into the laws and morals of the various countries. There is therefore a strong temptation to worship and behave
    3
    in oriental ways, sometimes at variance with the host traditions. Some Muslims and Sikhs, for example, have become so committed to the notion that religion always trumps politics and laws, that they have been trying to subordinate local regulations to the demands of Salarian law. Many of them have actually managed to compel the British Government to legalize the religions of their own native countries. The Muslims are always the most aggressive immigrants and as they are also the most reproductive among the host peoples, their numbers have grown the most rapidly over the past few decades. They have thus become a real danger to the Anglo-Saxon elements of the society. The Canadians have thus seen some of the most negative results that can follow from a tendency to deal too liberally with hostile and aggressive invaders. Our government must be very firm in insisting that citizenship can only be offered to those who swear to obey the laws of Canada. All immigrant felonies should lead to immediate deportation. Moreover, all applicants should be thoroughly screened to prevent the infiltration of criminals, drug dealers and potential terrorists. Schools and colleges should be open to all newcomers to allow them to adjust as soon as possible to the Canadian conditions and to make positive contributions to our economy and culture. There are many Canadians who believe that the Liberals, in their anxiety to save thousands of oriental victims from torture and death, have been too lax in their screening methods. Already there is evidence of young Muslims declaring war on Christian institutions and of angry Christians going so far as to destroy Islamic mosques in some major urban centres.
    IV. SOME UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES
    Within the past few decades, too, Canadian immigration has produced some difficulties that could not easily have been foreseen. Many wealthy Chinese families, for example, have been welcomed into the country, especially in British Columbia, where they completely destroyed the real estate market by lifting the price of housing beyond the ability of the locals to compete. Hundreds of workers have been forced to abandon the major urban centres like Vancouver and Victoria and seek refuge in the suburbs and rural areas. They simply cannot afford to purchase houses in the cities. They therefore have to use public and other forms of transportation to get to their previous places of employment. The municipal governments have welcomed the foreign millionaires who
    4
    can afford the exorbitant property taxes. Provincial and municipal politicians are also vying among themselves to secure Chinese votes since the Chinese contingent has become so huge. There is also an Indian population that can be manipulated. In these ways, the newcomers are generally able to wield an enormous and unfair influence over Canadian politics and defeat the whole purpose of multiculturalism. V. SOME CONCLUSIONS
    History has shown that the major obstacle to multiculturalism and diversity in every part of this earth, be it Canada or elsewhere, is blatant racism. So long as the majority of Whites continue to believe that they are (and always have been intended by God to be) the cream of humanity and civilization, any effort to promote diversity and multiculturalism is doomed to failure. Many Whites have been known to favour Indian and oriental cuisine and sometimes music. But most of them still regard Blacks, Browns and Yellows as inferior beings. Note how, even the 21st century, American Whites have embraced Donald J Trump, despite his obvious and incredible bigotry, stupidity, ignorance, mendacity, vulgarity and narcissism. Please note, too, how shabbily the British have recently been treating the same Blacks and Browns, whose ancestors had fought so nobly and unselfishly for “The Mother Country” during two World Wars. Nor is there any secret that US police have traditionally been killing and brutalizing innocent Blacks and Browns with total impunity despite the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960s. Too many important Caribbean Blacks have been known to suffer too often from Canadian forms of stereotyping. Such well-known writers as Austin Clarke and Cecil Foster have attested to this. And only the other day, such a popular and very well-known television personality as Marci Ien was stopped by cops in her own driveway in Toronto because she seemed to be driving a car that a black young lady could not have been expected to afford. For any attempt at multiculturalism to succeed, the host country must educate and train its police forces to fully understand the concept of racial equality. It must promote the idea that nonwhite professionals are generally of equal value and intelligence in comparison with their white counterparts. In the same way, it should encourage Canadian Heads of Departments and Ministries to make a careful study of foreign colleges and universities, their syllabi, staffs and standards. Only
    5
    in this way will they be able to properly evaluate the merits and abilities of Eastern and Oriental professionals seeking employment in this country. Multiculturalism and Diversity can only be accomplished if the host country is prepared to make all immigrants as comfortable as possible. Canada must treat them as equals to native citizens and make them feel even more “at home” than they had previously felt. On the other hand, Canada must insist on total obedience to its laws, customs and traditions. It is very indecent and unconscionable, after all, for a friendly neighbour to seek refuge in your home and then attempt to control your family’s behaviour.

Leave a Reply to Hal AustinCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading