Good that the DLP hierarchy sees the need to distance itself from this stupid ad. Hopefully many of the DLPites on the blog will do the same.

@Sargeant

“Stupid Ad” David? Clearly beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Correct!

If the AD reflecttive actions of the BLP, them there is nothing wrong with it. I think it is responsible politics to remind the voters of the action of any PARTY.

I suspect that the people behind the ads and the DLP knew that there would have been an outcry against them.

They were trying to get the graphic designer to front for them, the person said no, I am only doing a job. They then went to an advertising agency under one bogus name and then changed to another name when the ad agency told them that the Nation said that if a lawsuit is brought against the paper, the ad agency would have to pay the damages. So I guess that is why they had to put a name at the top of the ad.

You think these Dems sweet?? And George Pilgrim does not know who is behind the ad? I maintain you have to be of a special breed to be a Dem!

George Pilgrim should be the last to comment on the distasteful ad.. He is part of the whole smear campaign. He, along with others is trying to “wring” the principal and the Secretary Treasurer’s hand to get into a shady deal to re-start the Queen’s College pavilion. He don’t want the project to go out to tender, talking about that it would be a special tender. He and big head ugly Ronald Jones are are part of the conspiracy. Hold your grounds Mr. Principal and Secretary Treasurer.

I saw an ad featuring Mia and Owen which accurately quoted a statement made by the former PM about his former deputy. The only thing I found offensive would have been the acronym PARO at the end.

Politicians are truly strange people, they now disassociate themselves from the truth because some people find it to be inconvenient. Can we really trust politicians from either party?

@Red Money Burning Red | January 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM |

And a wise one would be quick to ask Ms Mottley who it is that is paying for and running these ads, and while at it that person should also ask her why has she allowed Noot Rudder and his gay band to destabalise Ronald Toppin and why is it that the PA to Forde has been canvassing in St James North against the sex pervert Hinkson?……………………………………….

You know I always say that it takes a special breed of person to be a Dem.

You really got talk for Mr Hinkson. Why dont you talk about your candidate, Harry Husbands who screws around on his poor wife. Remember the lady Esther Byer Suckoo fired unceremoniously, speak to her. Tell BU how the poor wife had to call the police and report their vehicle stolen after it flew pass her and was not driven by Harry Husbands who then had to confess that he gave the lady the vehicle to drive. Look get off of BU this bright Saturday afternoon with your crap!

Mottley has no interest in a BLP win at this election with Arthur still stumbling around the party, she will hang him out to dry this time around and send him away and run her own campaign 5 years hence forth.

There is no one that is within the Inner circle of the Mottley dynasty that will tell you anything other than she has a plan to unseat Arthur and Payne, Marshall and Toppin all of whom set out to destroy her well being.

There is no dispute that she has been having that destabalising program undertaken in the constituencies of Toppin and Hinkson, I know for a fact of life from the mouth of Rudder himself in a place in Black Rock and I know for a fact of three days of canvassing in St James North with Forde’s PA in Sion Hill to persuade BLP voters to vote for the DEMS, not a moment of hearsay my friend but a fact of life, you may not want it said as it dispels the rumour of peace in your party but life is what it is and Mottley has been doing whatsoever she needs to do to keep herself in the frame for the next election when Arthur will be a thing of the past.

Also have you noticed the backward and junior position she has been assigned to speak in these platform speeches a very very junior position an also ran position.

Ps can you see Arthur having to step down as Prime Minister and leaving the country in the hands of Dale Marshall were he to win his seat ?

What an uninspiring list of leadership candidates. But Pupatello should be at the bottom of the list, not the top. What an arrogant person! She is not even an elected official but wants to prorogue parliament until her by-election date. Probably because she does not want all the McGuinty scandals to taint her chances of being elected. She has never mentioned anything about cleaning up all the Liberal mis-management and scandals. So I can only thing that she wants to continuing governing, if elected, as in the past. And she arrogantly thinks she is going to win her seat in any by-election? Chances are she will not. And after she loses the election of her seat, what then? Is parliament going to be indefinitely prorogued? And yes, we as taxpayers can cover the costs of her by-election.

A BLP candidate and former cabinet Minister compares a former Prime Minister to being worse than the Devil – the so called “9000” crowd roars.
The BLP does not have a problem with that.

The BLP in the St. John by Election uses a photo of a sad widow Mara Thompson, puts a mock crown on it and runs a whole Page ad criticising her as a “Mock Queen.” Paid Campaign ad by the BLP. The BLP had no problem with that tone.

A BLP operative runs a facebook page holding the image of a cow on a corned beef can and inviting young Barbadians to call it the Prime Minister. She is seen receiving awards at BLP functions and is in nearly all the photo ops of the different BLP candidates.
The BLP does not have a problem with that.

The BLP launches a cartoon page to ridicule a Prime Minister and condones the use the most vile language to describe and talk about their political opponents.
The BLP does not have a problem with that.

An ad is run by a group and simply uses Owen Arthur’s own words and the BLP apologist “Prodigal” is running around the blog like a headless chicken. Can any one spell HYPOCRISY = BLP.

Excuse me but did a BLP supporter on this blog make a candidate’s marriage and alleged infidelity an issue while complaining about the tone of a campaign ad that uses a man’s own words?
The higher the monkey climb…..Please Prodigal – a word of advice – If you are supporting Owen Arthur with Kerry Symmonds as a BLP candidate- please do not make infidelity and treatment of wives an issue. Your spit shall surely land in your face. Just some friendly advice.

……..”The Deloitte report was stolen”.. Who could forget such absurdity and nonsense coming from the highest Office in the land..Poorrakey that’s what it is.. Question: stolen by whom and when, where?…..Did heshe come thru “The White House” window in the mid of the night?……Even if the document was misplaced…. did Deloitte not have copies ?….Is such the best that can be offered up to people you now carry down to the wire like luppy ‘living dogs’ by obviously soon Dead Lions?…Why the hold up for us to exercising our constitutional right anyway? Don’t you Lions think the outcome will be the same whether you do so now, or April 30th? Is this how we treat those who put you Kings of Beasts there in the first place to ravish us and make a mockery?

Oh come now Mr.Leo… bullshit us not anymore….WE READY TO VOTE….. pray, grant us that..

To clarify: when the Prime Minister referred to the CLICO Report being stolen it was in the context that it was published by the Nation before it was made official.

“We have not commissioned nor authorised any such ads; and, therefore, for anyone to associate the DLP with these newspaper postings is not only totally untrue but very misleading, and designed to put the ruling party in a bad light. As a mature, political party, we do not resort to or condone such tactics that have been the hallmark of the Opposition BLP in recent months,”

This statement, poor grammar and all, does not deny KNOWLEDGE of the person(s) responsible for the ad. George Pilgrim would have done better by keeping his mouth shut.

David breaking news.

History has been made in Canada.

The new Leader of Liberal party of Ontario is a lesbian.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1320429–ontario-liberal-leadership-convention-kathleen-wynne-puts-gay-question-to-rest

As a form of Protest , the BLP should call a Mock Elections for a particular date. Have people go throught the process of marking a ballot paper that could be used as a flyer with slogans from the BLP’s campaign

Enuff;
Actually, George is suggesting quite clearly that the BLP put that AD out there. No one in the DLP hierarchy is responsible for the ads. The BLP has a history of running such ads. Ergo its the BLP that put out that false flag ad. We will soon hear that Mia is the one that put them out herself.

Now that would be very interesting.

George, connect the dots please.

Jamaicans have a saying “duppy know who to frighten”

Never mind the BLP protestations, pretty soon they will show their true colours with some very nasty ads about the DLP and the PM and as usual the BLP yardfowl choir will sing their legitimacy.
Fair is Fair and Owen Arthur will be exposed for the pretender that he is.Clyde Mascoll said that he was a monumental failure as an economist and I heard Mascoll say recently that throughout the years he (Mascoll) has always been consistent in his arguments.

‘Let me see whether Owen will tell Ms. Wynne to her face that she is not “a leader who enjoys wide acceptance and acceptability in the wider society”
why trod a dead horse? the cadres polls have consistently given a resounding passing grade to ms mottley as to her wider acceptance and acceptability by the public of barbados. the folly of the argument is that ms mottley has continued to overwhelmingly retain her seat which obviously she could not have done with the support of the sexually deviant in her constituency alone. if as we surmise that mr arthur was indeed referring to ms mottley’s sexual behaviour- rather than his foot in the mouth illadvised comments of stupidity for which he is well known- then the public has reudiated his perception in no uncertain terms and has endorsed ms mottley as a future leader of barbados.so why trod a dead horse.

I think the real difference is that the Canadian does not have a track record of abuse of her female sex partners, she maybe is free from the history of vicious beating and furious biting as handed and bite out by Mottley.

Nor is she one who determined if some should stay or leave the country by if that person was willing to submit her body to Mottley for it to suffer its abuse and STRAP Lashes, as one Guyanese was forced to take to have her Work Permit granted, those are immoral and sick reactions by a sick an immoral Mottley person.

DAVID BU should apologise for connecting the ad ,to the DLP.furthermore should remove the underline caption which says DLP AD from the picture

@!
“Excuse me but did a BLP supporter on this blog make a candidate’s marriage and alleged infidelity an issue while complaining about the tone of a campaign ad that uses a man’s own words”?

Excuse you……………in response to a DLP operative attacking OSA, I had to bring up that to show the hypocrisy of DLP yardfowls. You all seem want to expose OSA’s business and project the DLP as paragons of virtue which of course we know is so wrong.

Keep on attacking OSA, it will backfire on you!

Interesting to note that a flavour of the much debated PARO ad appears in today’s press minus the bullet holes…hmmm.