Justice Chris Blackman (l) Chief Justice Designate Marston Gibson (r)

Many believed the opening of the Judiciary Centre would have provided the perfect opportunity for Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart to announce the overdue appointment of Marston Gibson as Chief Justice of Barbados. Barbadians must conclude by the non-announcement that the roadblock which Gibson confronts in his current job which prevents him from resigning is taking longer to overcome than all would prefer. The Marston Gibson vigil  therefore continues.

Prime Minister Fruendel Stuart at the opening complimented the palatial edifice at Whitepark which now houses the Courts, Court Registry and Community Legal Services however he hinted we needed to improve how justice is being delivered.  A snippet from Prime Minister Stuart’s address provided an insight to his unease when he referenced the length of time individuals are held on remand. One could speculate that by complimenting retired Chief Justice among others for making the Judicial Centre a reality, his criticism of the justice system in the same breath was a chiding of Simmons’ stewardship.

Our justice system limps along despite the recent public plaudit from Sir Dennis Byron the President of the Caribbean Court of Justice, Barbadians should sit up and show concern on what is a grave matter concerning our inefficient court system. The administration of justice is critical to maintaining a stable Barbados. No effort or money should be spared to protect the judicature. A breach in confidence by the populace of our Courts will deteriorate to anarchy. If such were to occur it would remove one of the more visible and desirable characteristics which Barbados has earned through the years.

To add to the woes of the legal fraternity, we read about Justice Chris Blackman who sits on the Bahamas Court of Appeal  “named as the first respondent in the action filed in the name of the trustees of the Bahamas Communications and Public Officers Union (BCPOU) and The Bahamas Communications and Public Managers Union (BCPMU). The Registrar of The Court of Appeal is listed as the second respondent in the writ filed this week.” Justice Chris Blackman, a Barbadian  “is being accused of bias and conflict of interest in a writ filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of two unions that sought to block the sale of BTC to Cable and Wireless Communications (CWC).” – see report.

The old people have a saying, when it rains it pours.

68 responses to “The Marston Gibson Vigil Continues, Barbadian Justice Chris Blackman Named In An Action In Bahamas”


  1. @anthony

    What % of the 40 thousand policyholders do not have cash surrender value?

  2. Caswell Franklyn Avatar
    Caswell Franklyn

    I am not surprised by the news that CLICO did not file a defence in the Parris’ case. As a matter of fact I predicted it. Parris will get his default judgement, probably from the money that Government lent to Public Workers Credit Union to buy Clico Mortgage Finance Company. You must look to see if there are other unreported law suits filed by other Clico executives. They will get full payments, and the policy holders will be lucky if they get cents on the dollar.

  3. Truthman Burton Avatar
    Truthman Burton

    Caswell, there is a man (I assume) called HAMILTON HILL, who has poured scorn on me, and has characterized me and my strictures against the CLICO debacle as: “LAUGHABLE”

    He has suggested I give up, because I am getting no traction, and maybe I should try BICO.

    I hope he reads your comment above ….. it should tickle him and he will get yet another opportunity to LAUGH!

  4. Truthman Burton Avatar
    Truthman Burton

    I am no legal eagle, but I was expecting a defense from CLICO’s Judicial Managers, who now manage, and are supposedly functioning in the interest of the company, also having declared that part of their mission would be to rebuild the company, if that were possible.

    Are they just going to let the man who helped mismanage and plunder the company get away with obtaining what seems to be, an entirely undeserved bonus of TEN MILLION DOLLARS?

    Don’t they at least believe that a forensic audit would render PARRIS’s claims null and void.

    In view of the placement of the Judicial Managers, should Garth Patterson, retain his place as attorney for CLICO? Should not the JM’s appoint their own attorney?

    I understand that Patterson parted ways with the THOMPSON LAW FIRM sometime ago, but if he has retained the CLICO business, it would seem that that pervasive protective THOMPSON SPIRIT as it relates to CLICO, has remained with Garth Patterson’s law firm.

    Whoever then is in charge of the legal representation, isn’t that entity required to explain to the policy holders the failure to file a defense?


  5. @david. What good are the cash surrender values if you can’t get cash fpr them when you they are either surrendered or matured.


  6. @anthony

    The point being made is there is a number of policyholders of the 40 thousand whose policies have not accrued surrender value i.e. less than 2-3 years therefore financial claim would be negligible.


  7. Truthman; Good points in your 2:34 pm post.
    Perhaps Amused or Jack Spratt or anyone of our legal posters could comment on the practicality, legality or otherwise of the Judicial manager taking the action you have proposed or were they appointed too late to be in a position to take such action. If they were indeed appointed too late it suggests either a voluntary or involuntary dropping of the ball by the Ministry of Finance.

    So many missteps!


  8. Just a quick opinion, David, since I am not fully briefed. Is the company sued the identical one under judicial management?


  9. @Spratt

    Need to research it but suspect he is suing the holding company.

  10. jujst only asking Avatar
    jujst only asking

    @Caswell

    Am i missing something in you argument. If the mortgage com
    pany was sold before he filed his his claim, would there be a future relationship between the company and clico? If not how can his claim be settled from the money govt loaned to the credit union to purchase the mortgage company?


  11. jujst only asking;

    Following on from your question above I would like to know also:- When the Credit Union took over the Mortgage Company did it only take over the assets and not the debts? Would the debts only become real debts when a legal claim is made or would such a big loan necessarily have to be on the books? Would the money loaned by NIS, as facilitated by Government, be expected to be used to cover both assets and debts as carefully assessed for the sale? Would the timing of the sale of the mortgage company be of any significant relevance to when Mr. Parris filed his claim? Was Mr. Parris’ claim made of the mortgage company or another CLICO company?


  12. It seems the Nation created unnecessary discussion because it filed an incomplete story.

    Safe in law’s arms

    2011-06-27

    no legal action against CLICO while under judicial management

    Its placement under judicial management has given troubled insurance company CLICO International Life Insurance Limited a temporary reprieve from legal action.

    This means that a $10 million claim by Leroy Parris, former Executive Chairman of the company’s parent CLICO Holdings (Barbados) Limited, will not proceed unless the court says so.

    This was disclosed this evening by judicial managers Deloitte Consulting Ltd, represented by Oliver Jordan and Patrick Toppin, following a front-page newspaper article yesterday on the issue.

    Deloitte explained said that “in accordance with the Insurance Act and pursuant to the Court Order of April 29, 2011, all legal actions against CIL are stayed and can only proceed with the approval of the court”.

    “This would therefore include the previous claim by Parris against CIL,” it noted.

    “Since our firm’s appointment on April 13, 2011 as Judicial Manager of CIL we have had no notice of any new legal actions being commenced by Parris or any other person(s),” Jordan and Toppin added.

    The managers said there were “several errors contained in the front page article” regarding the legal claim by Parris, including that CLICO Holdings was the company under judicial management.

    “The facts are … CLICO Holdings (Barbados) is not under Judicial Management. Its subsidiary, CLICO International Life Insurance Ltd. was placed under Judicial Management effective April 13, 2011. Based on a further application by the Judicial Manager, the High Court approved an amended order on April 29, 2011 to clarify and issue clear directions,” the Deloitte representatives said.

    “In January 2011, an attorney-at-law on behalf of Leroy Parris initiated action against CLICO Holdings for unpaid bonuses and other contractual obligations.

    “In January 2011, Parris’ attorney-at-law also initiated action against CIL for repayment of amounts claimed for matured and surrendered policies held by Parris and his immediate family,” they added.

    They said the newspaper report was therefore “erroneous and gives the wrong impression as it relates to the insurance company which is currently under judicial management”. (SC)


  13. Oops! I meant “big debt” not “big loan” in my post above (line 5)


  14. David; re. your post above about the Barbados Today story. My reading of that news item suggests that Mr. Parris is probably home free re. his 10 million dollar claim on CLICO HOLDINGS. The company under judicial management is CIL and that company is the one that cannot be sued, not CLICO holdings. Therefore the claim that will not go ahead at this time is for the insurance policies held by Parris and his family members only. Not the big 10 million dollar claim on CLICO holdings.

    It is quite possible that I am wrong, but the Barbados Today article seems to be saying what I am interpreting above. Grateful for Amused or Jack Spratt’s input.


  15. If my interpretation of the BT story is correct it might suggest that the monies paid through the Credit Union for CIL might indeed end up in the CLICO holdings coffers. As that company is not in Judicial management could the scenario painted by Franklin be within the realms of possibility, i.e. that the money that will pay off Parris’ claims on CLICO holdings could almost directly have come from NIS, as facilitated by Government?

    There is a possibility that this is not so. But if it is, what is the message being sent to the concerned policy holders? especially since it seems unlikely that they will be able to recoup their investments.


  16. Could someone refresh my memory on Why was’nt the various CLICO Holding company in Barbados put under judicial management?


  17. Oops again!! Delete “various” in my last post above


  18. Thanks, has left to read.

Leave a Reply to anthonyCancel reply

Trending

Discover more from Barbados Underground

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading