Many people believe that the Arthur administration has floundered in the fourth term. Although some agree that on the subject of the economy Arthur is eligible for a passing grade. On the subject of Arthur’s social agenda we have struggled to assign a F (Fail) or an A (Absent). A thought which has flashed through the BU household may appear to be controversial by some.
But, is there merit in harboring the thought?
When Beverly Arthur, the former wife of Prime Minister Arthur was installed at Illaro Court, she was very visible in social activities. In fact, we remember being pinned with a cancer ribbon on Broad Street as she worked with the Barbados Cancer Society to highlight the scourge of cancer on our society. In her place has come the stoic Julie Arthur whose agenda after several months of marriage is still to be revealed to Barbadians. In her defense she has recently recovered from a personal tragedy but the publicity which she meekly endured at that time causes us to dismiss that she is handicapped from performing social duties. Whether we look at previous “First Ladies” of Barbados or abroad, one thing is certain; good ones help to reinforce the social agenda of their partners. Maybe we are being too harsh on Julie Arthur — we do not see the wives of our Ministers and Members of Parliament being visible either. Could it be that they are embarrassed by skeletons in the closets of their husbands? Or maybe they want to avoid the unflattering reputation which the most visible wife attracted in the person of Lady Stella.
The question to be asked must be whether Julie Arthur is capable of performing such a role, or is she acting on instructions from her husband.
Leave a Reply to 100 per bajanCancel reply